Why I'll Never Give Up Landscapes for Portrait Work

Why I'll Never Give Up Landscapes for Portrait Work

In the words of the great John McEnroe: "you cannot be serious". This is how I respond when people ask me if I'd like to swap landscapes for portrait work. Here's why.

Now before I start, I want to make it explicitly clear that I’m writing this with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek. It’s lighthearted and just a bit of fun, with quite a few elements of absolute truth sprinkled throughout. So, with that out the way, let’s get into why I will never leave shooting landscapes for portrait work.

Dealing With People

Have you met people? Trying to deal with different types of people in portrait work and get the best out of them is enough to make me want to grab my surfboard, drive down to the beach as fast as my car will take me, and paddle kilometers out to sea. For weeks. Let’s walk through some different types of people you have to deal with in portrait work:

Babies

Little babies are so cute aren’t they? Until you try to get good photos of them. They scream, their heads nearly explode, and there’s some uncomfortable laughs between you and the parents as you both try valiantly to console and cajole the poor little tot into giving you something that resembles even a half-hearted smile. Then you find yourself making all sorts of ridiculous sounds and faces in the faint hope of getting just a fraction of a cheeky little grin. When you finally get some joyful, animated movement to work with and hit that shutter button remotely, you then run back to the camera and pray that you’ve got something that will allow this all to end, only to find that mummy has her eyes half-closed. Good Lord, we have to start again! Coochi, coochi, coooooo.

My five-month-old daughter paying tribute to Popeye.

Two-Year-Olds

Even though research suggests that two-year-old kids should know at least 200 words by that stage of their young, budding lives, it seems that when they come to do portrait work, they only bring one. It’s a two-letter word that begins with "N" and finishes with "O." Smile Johnny. “No.” Look at the camera Johnny. "No". Playfully pat little baby’s head Johnny. "No". Stop screaming Johnny. "Noooooooo." It’s even better when you combine shoots with two-year-olds and tiny toddlers. Happy days, indeed.

This is my 2.5-year-old daughter's idea of cooperating.

Teenagers

They walk in with a surly look, shirts unkempt, and earphones in. You say hello, they ignore you and shuffle past, eyes glued to their phones. They leave pee on the toilet, zits splattered on the mirror, and have a general demeanor which makes you think the weight of the world is on their poor, encumbered shoulders. More than likely, it’s just that their latest Instagram post didn’t get as many likes as they wanted, but alas, trying to take photos of them where you can turn that frown upside-down isn’t the most enjoyable of tasks.

Parents

Especially the ones who are actually paying. Between negotiating the price, the number of prints they can get, how long the turnaround will be, and any other add-ons included, it’s like a question and answer session by a CSI forensics team.

Now compare all that with landscape photography. On more than 90 percent of my shoots, I see no one and I interact with no one. It’s just me and nature, often without a person in the vicinity. To take a quote from the iconic Australian movie "The Castle": “how’s the serenity?” I can move at my own leisurely pace, soak in the sights, sounds, and smells of solitude, and rejoice in the expanses and beauty of this world. For me, it really is an exercise in meditation, relaxation, and escape, and I wouldn’t change it for all the tea in China (or coffee in Brazil).

I sat on these rocks for about three hours and only saw two fisherman in the distance the whole time. I could see the clouds forming, so I just waited. And waited. And waited. And listened to my favorite tunes. Try doing that with screaming toddlers and panicked parents!

Time Restrictions

I’m not the best timekeeper, nor do I like to be controlled by time. Perhaps it’s because both my parents were in the Royal Navy, but I really like to do things at my own speed (which, as you could probably guess, isn’t particularly fast most of the time). Australians like to say it’s a laid back nature, whereas other, more high-tempo people might like to use another four-letter word that starts with “l” and ends in “y.”

Regardless, when you’re working with people and doing portrait work, you have appointments to make, appointments to keep, and demands placed on your time. Then, you get late arrivals, or even better, late cancellations, which means not only have you prepared everything for nothing, but you’ve also lost half the day you could have been out in the wild. There are also the phone calls, emails, and constant pings of text messages to deal with too. Technology can be your friend, but I really don’t like to be enslaved by a device in my pocket.

If you miss sunrise or can't make sunset here in the summer months, it's fine, because every afternoon, these giant rainclouds inevitably descend before explosion. You don't get so much flexibility doing portrait work.

In contrast, nature is far more forgiving with time. In fact, you can do whatever you want, whenever you want. You missed sunrise because you were watching Netflix til 2 am? No worries, the sun will rise again in 24 hours. Or just go out mid-morning and shoot something else. The light’s not ideal in today’s golden hour? No drama, shoot black and white. A lot of recent rain putting a dampener on the early morning ocean colors? All good, head off to some forests or waterfalls and shoot long exposures. The point is: unless you’re doing a paid shoot for a client with strict working conditions, you can pretty much go anywhere at any time doing landscape photography. And if one place isn’t good at one particular time during the day, just go back again later, or even next week when conditions are more ideal. That’s not really an option when you’re dealing with people and appointments.

Creative Freedom Limitations

When you’re dealing with people and portrait work, there’s not a lot of wiggle room for creativity, both during the shoot and in post-production. If you’re working in a studio setting, then there ain’t a lot you can do except change those dreamy background drapes or those starry night skies. And if you’re working outside on beaches or in forests or some other interesting location, you’re usually shooting pretty wide open (a low f/stop number) anyway to blur the background out so the setting becomes secondary, regardless. Sometimes, you can get carried away with location shoots and let the setting take the focus completely away from your human subjects, but that isn’t really ideal in portrait work.

In post-production, you’re also somewhat limited. As much as I’d like to put some devil horns on little Johnny and change his face from ruddy pink to devil red, I’m not sure how much mummy would appreciate that. Aside from touch-up work, removing blemishes, and some gentle dodging and burning, there isn’t a lot you can do artistically with portrait work (unless of course you’ve been explicitly instructed to do so or insist on using your latest VSCO preset pack despite the hesitations of the clients).

A composite shot where I dropped this sun in to give it a little extra something.

With landscape photography, on the other hand, you can do whatever your heart desires (within the realms of subtlety, or course). The sky wasn’t cooperative this morning? No problem, just drop some dramatic clouds in. Didn’t get that pop from your colors you wanted? All good, just tweak those vibrance sliders and curves adjustment layers. Think this scene would look better with a subject in it? Bingo, let’s do some composite work. With the software available these days, whether it’s Photoshop or something else you prefer, there are literally thousands of ways to interpret or edit your raw landscape files. You can make them warm, cool, sepia, or black and white, and that’s just for starters. It’s not so easy when you’re trying to take a photo of a happy family.

Conclusion

In closing, portrait work can be very rewarding. Seeing the joy in a person’s face when you present your results or conveying the depths of emotions of a person to the viewer can bring a lot of satisfaction to photographers. However, for me, there are far too many things that make me quiver in my boots with portraiture work to ever even countenance the idea of trading it for shooting lansdcapes. The creative freedom and relaxation it provides me is something I won't be letting go of any time soon.

What are your thoughts? Can portrait work ever be as enjoyable as landscape work? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments

19 Comments

Jeff Walsh's picture

While I agree with every point, otherwise summarized as "people suck," in terms of business and monetary opportunities, landscape struggles badly compared to portrait/family/children photography

Iain Stanley's picture

Yes, despite my patience, I’m still waiting for that mountain in the distance to pay up!

Jeff Walsh's picture

Exactly, mountains never pay their bill. Theyre almost as bad as waterfalls.

The best thing about taking photos that don't have people in them is being places that have few people there. At least that is my take.

Iain Stanley's picture

I could have saved myself 1,500 words! Spot on :)

Adam Palmer's picture

Man-- it would be nice if it were easier to make a living selling art. If you count the amount of money people spend on landscapes for their walls vs the amount the spend on wedding and family pic photos I think the portrait pile of money is like 10x bigger. Good thing I like people :)

Iain Stanley's picture

Yep, totally agree there. Oceans tend not to carry wallets on them, or have credit card facilities. I don’t think anyone would argue where the money is in photography. But that opens up another issue of passion vs. work, which I intend to explore further soon.

Jeff Walsh's picture

I'm extremely interested in that, and look forward to the article. If I could figure it out, I would shoot nature all day everyday, but it just (in my experience, and I'm not good at business) doesn't pay the bills or have anywhere near the client base. Hell, you barely have to try for weddings. Someone you know relatively well is bound to get married or know someone who is, and then its just a matter of doing a great job and leveraging that for more work. Not to mention, the 3k per wedding as opposed to say a $100 print.

I actually do children photography. Also teenagers and adult. It’s not always it turns out good, but most of the time it does. Normally I do have pictures I am happy with., and clients to.
All that negative above is not reality but perception.
On the other hand making landscapes that is sugar coated and a fake representation of the truth makes me desire to work in black and white:) Actually I more and more think photography is fake, and that black and white is a great way to express my self, within truth but still artistic

Iain Stanley's picture

As you can see at the top of the article, it’s written tongue in cheek. Ironic that you mention black and white though, as it could be argued that’s the most fake of all. Maybe I’ll discuss that soon :)

Well funny or not there of cause is a point to it, but I do not find it so hard.
In respect of landscape I am not such a big fan, I think there is so much work that are photoshopped.
I think black and white would be similar to water color art, it is evident that it is a media that present is limited by technic.

Robby MacGillivray's picture

Read and enjoyed in the spirit in which it was written - I am a resident of South Australia so a short distance from home can result in fishing, golf and photography all in a 24 hour period and all without pressure - one great advantage of retirement!
Only the football code differs ;)

Iain Stanley's picture

Yes, when/if you have the means to enjoy photography and nature just for the enjoyment, it really is a wonderful escape. Many people need to pay bills though, and that’s understandable.

NRL, AFL......nothing beats a beer and the footy

Daniel Medley's picture

I'm an outdoors person. I hike, I explore. I love being out in the great wide open alone.

But I much prefer to photograph people. It has more meaning to me to capture that particular moment. I love collaborating, too.

That being said, I don't photograph babies or teenagers.

So there's that.

Iain Stanley's picture

Yes I can certainly relate. In recent times, I’ve used people a lot more in my shots (usually me) to add some context. I do it via silhouettes though

My one guiding principle: I never photograph anything with an opinion.

Iain Stanley's picture

Haha I like it. Damn opinionated river I’ll never shoot you again!!

A landscape is a portrait of nature...
A portrait is a landscape of humanity...
And beauty is in the eye of the beholder...share it...shoot both...