• Originals
    • Categories
      • Gear
        • Forum
          • Picture of the Day
            • Contests
              • More
                • FS Gear Guide
                • Fstoppers T-shirts
              • Home
              • Advertise
              • Meet the Writers
              • Submit Content
              • Contact
              Foap app
              Foap app
              July 20, 2012
              Jaron Schneider

              iPhoneographers Rejoice: Easily License and Sell Your Photos

              Have you been wondering how to make money with the thousands of photos sitting on your iPhone? Well, if you don’t want to print them out, you can always sell the license and try and make a few bucks. That’s the goal behind the iPhone app Foap, an online marketplace in iStock/Getty style.

              The idea is pretty simple. You take a photo, you think it’s pretty rad, and you upload it to Foap. If it fits within their criteria, it gets accepted and can be purchased by anyone for $10. The return is unusually generous: those who upload photos get a 50% kickback of $5 per purchased photo. It doesn’t seem like the criteria they use to select photos is too strict either, as New York Times journalist Roy Furchgott discovered. He uploaded 25 photos, 21 of which were accepted.


              1hlFyh8qRtV7dCsE23Ly80 temp upload.apluqoxw.320x480 75 iPhoneographers Rejoice: Easily License and Sell Your Photos 1hlFyh8qRtV7dCsE23Ly80 temp upload.jloauxss.320x480 75 iPhoneographers Rejoice: Easily License and Sell Your Photos

              1hlFyh8qRtV7dCsE23Ly80 temp upload.yryaqinm.320x480 75 iPhoneographers Rejoice: Easily License and Sell Your Photos 1hlFyh8qRtV7dCsE23Ly80 temp upload.zmrijmjz.320x480 75 iPhoneographers Rejoice: Easily License and Sell Your Photos


              Good news to those who hate Instagram, Foap doesn’t accept altered images. They have to be unprocessed.

              Be careful though, as any image you upload you forsake the rights to. As Furchgott says. “A potential hitch is that all rights are sold when the photos are sent in. If you send in a picture of your grandmother and it shows up on a poster saying, “Help Elderly Drug Addicts,” tough luck. You have no recourse.”

              As “iPhoneography” gets more and more popular, don’t be surprised to see increasing numbers of services and apps like Foap.

              What do you think? Would you use this service? Who is buying these images do you think? Foap supposedly paid out $15,000 in its first week, so someone must be grabbing them for something.

              Foap is free to download at the iTunes app store.

              [Via the New York Times]

              News
              Photojournalistic
              Pictures
              « Through The Lens With White House Photographer Pete Souza
              How You DO Shoot Olympic Athletes: The Best Yet »
              • MxmDmchnk

                Who would want to buy iPhone photos?

              • BDWT

                Clearly someone is buying them. Small websites maybe? 

                Either way, if it’s a way to earn a few bucks, why the heck not??

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1538831151 John-Paul Zajackowski

                How do they handle model and property releases?

              • digitaloxygen

                According to the information on their site and in the app they just take your word for it and assume you have permission…
                http://foap.com/pages/terms 

              • digitaloxygen

                Cautionary note for those who are concerned about licensing…

                B.4. GRANT OF LICENSE TO THE CONTENT
                “…the Seller grants to the Buyer a non-exclusive, perpetual, world-wide and fully-paid right of use to the Content for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, including the right to modify, reproduce, publish, display and sub-license the Content, and create derivative works thereof, in any manner (the “Content License”) ”

                C.5. NO RIGHT FOR SELLER TO BE IDENTIFIED AS PHOTOGRAPHER
                “…The Seller is aware and agrees that by granting a Content License under this User Agreement, the Seller waives all its rights to be identified or mentioned as photographer or copyright holder of the Content. Thus, the Buyer shall be free to use the Content in accordance with the Content License without mentioning the Seller. However, the Buyer shall not be entitled to state or otherwise indicate that the Buyer is the copyright holder of the Content, but may merely state that the Buyer uses the Content under license.”

                source: http://foap.com/pages/terms

              • http://twitter.com/IAM_THE_KGB KGB

                The TOS are brutal, you hand the buyer your pictures to do whatever they want with them, including re-selling them.

                You guys at Fstoppers actually think this is OK?

                What are you guys smoking’………?

              • http://www.facebook.com/carl.michaels.1840 Carl Michaels

                Ridiculous

              • digitaloxygen

                Don’t forget this service is primarily focused on smart phone photos. Are we worried about losing revenue on iPhone photos? Have you / will you ever sell or liscense your iPhone photos elsewhere? Snap a quick shot or two with your smartphone during a real shoot, sell them through foap and the real photos via the regular channels. The payout via foap sounds decent compared to most micro stock.

              • digitaloxygen

                From an article about foap…
                “So, who’s buying these photos? Any company looking for stock photo art, say co-founders Alexandra Bylund and David Los. Bylund worked for a travel agency that was constantly running up against a variety of problems finding interesting, usable photos. ”It was kind of boring to see the same faces all thetime in the big stock image sites,” Bylund said in a phone call Tuesday. “And one problem was that if we found a good photo, a nice, face, the other travel agencies found the same one.”
                The photos often didn’t strike the right tone — not localized enough for style or place — and she also found them boring: “It’s almost like they’re the same very well-styled photos, without a spontaneous feeling, without the natural look.”
                “

              • Nismode

                Considering that the iPhone takes 8MP stills (idk if they would be uploaded full res), the quality could be deemed decent enough to be worried.

              • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jens-Hamada/100003300254445 Jens Hamada

                sorry but why mobile phone photos only?

                i mean is there a market especially for crap photos?

                i don´t say a mobile phone photo has to be bad…. but lets be honest and face the facts. 90% ARE bad snapshots with medicore image quality.

                so why not snapshots…. but at least with DSLR image quality?

              • digitaloxygen

                It can really all be summed up with these…
                http://fstoppers.com/iphone
                http://fstoppers.com/a-new-iphone-fashion-shoot-to-silence-the-haters

                but for continued discussion…

                “why mobile phone photos only”
                I would guess focusing on smartphone photos allows them to separate themselves from an already saturation micro stock market.  It makes them unique and gives some authenticity to their content.

                — quote —
                “And one problem was that if we found a good photo, a nice, face, the other travel agencies found the same one.”

                The photos often didn’t strike the right tone — not localized enough for style or place — and she also found them boring: “It’s almost like they’re the same very well-styled photos, without a spontaneous feeling, without the natural look.”
                — quote —

                While they do apparently allow non-smartphone content, too much of it will make them just like other stock sites.  It will be interesting to see how much of that bleeds in.  A lot of the top rated stuff (not necessarily top selling) is clearly not from a smartphone.

                “90% are bad snapshots with mediocre quality”
                buyers are buyers.  obviously those who are buying are fine with the quality and “mediocre image quality”.  in fact maybe this will push smartphone shoots to push for better quality in their own images knowing they have the potential to easily sell them.

                “so why not snapshots…. but at least with DSLR image quality?”
                as above technically they will accept non-smartphone images but being that more users carry smartphones than dslrs on a regular basis it makes sense to tap that market and they can ramp up much faster and have access to a much larger constant stream of content.  Sure the keeper ratio is a lot lower but they are reviewing/approving and have lower standards than traditional micro stock so they are still reaping benefits.

                What it really comes down to is that the camera doesn’t matter and the perceived quality is all in the eye of the buyer.  Those concerned about quality or hi-resolution uses will likely stick to traditional stock for the most part as opposed to sourcing from a smartphone based site.  Sometimes it just doesn’t matter what you shoot with.

              • JeffT241

                Should be named Doap….for people who give up all their rights for $10

              • Connect with Fstoppers
                Follow @Fstoppers
              • Fstoppers Originals
              • Popular Articles
                • Adobe Photoshop CC Has Already Been Pirated In Just One Day
                • 24 Animated Gifs of Celebrities Before and After Retouching
                • What A Week Of Groceries Looks Like Around The World
                • Fstoppers Reviews the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens
                • THIS is Why You Need Insurance - Don't Risk Your Livelihood
                • Professional Retoucher Natalia Taffarel Shows Us Her Techniques And Workflow
                • Vivian Maier Films Coming Soon
                • Flash Vs. HDR For Interiors And Real Estate Photography, Part II: Mood And Color Case Study
                • Why You Should Be Offended By The Pirating of Photoshop
                • Joe McNally on Creating Lighting That Matches the Character of Your Location
                • Fashion Photographer Sue Bryce Offering an Entire Day of Photo Critiques
                • So You Want To Make A Professional Looking Print Photography Portfolio
                • 'World's Best Father' Captures Creative Portraits of His Daughter's Childhood
                • 10 Photographers to Look to for Inspiration
              • Recent Comments
                • Osiris said I Like cheeseburgers with hot sauce ! that is my choice and you can't stop me »
                • Manuela Unterbuchner said I'd be happy if it was really 20$ but no, they charge almost double that price in Germany! I refuse to su »
                • Zach Sutton Photography said "Her style of contemporary fashion-inspired portraiture gives her clients the experience of looking like »
                • Dave Williams said Think about that when they tell you that your OS will need to be upgraded for the next release and we jus »
                • Dave Williams said Maybe someone like yourself should go through a SERIOUS recession and see how that works for you and your »
                • RE Casper said Spot on and great comparison. »
                • Dave Williams said And STILL managed to make ONE BILLION DOLLARS in profit - not gross - last year. I'd say that Adobe didn' »
                • Dave Williams said So you're saying that BEFORE CC people did not know what they would have to budget to upgrade to the next »
              • Support Fstoppers
                current nikon rebates deals
              • FS Originals
              • Why You Should Be Offended By The Pirating of Photoshop
              • Adobe Talks About the Method and Challenges of Creating Photo Software
              • Flash Vs. HDR For Interiors And Real Estate Photography, Part II: Mood And Color Case Study
              • Here I Am: The Story of Tim Hetherington, War Photographer
              • 10 Photographers to Look to for Inspiration
              • Categories
              • Commercial
              • Video
              • Gear
              • Location
              • Strobe Light
              • Contests
              • Win a 30x40 Print
              • Alien Skin Retouch Contest
              • Win the Art Behind the Headshot
              • Black Rapid Contest
              • Win a Lowepro Bag
              • Random Posts
              • Leica Announces the Leica X Vario Digital Camera
              • Hipsters Rejoice! A Build-It-Yourself Plastic Camera
              • What if All Sports Were Shot Like Beach Volleyball
              • [BTS Video] So This Is What Happens To Your Luggage During Your Delta Flight
              • Sinar’s New Medium Format Back
              • Picture of the Day
              • Winter’s Beauty
              • Angkor Thom
              • Inner Child
              • Chase Tower
              • Christine
              • Home
              • Advertise
              • Meet the Writers
              • Submit Content
              • Contact
              • Sitemap
              © Fstoppers
              Made by Novum