[UPDATED] The Color Run Sues College Photographer After He Asks for Compensation for Image

[UPDATED] The Color Run Sues College Photographer After He Asks for Compensation for Image

[The Color Run and Maxwell Jackson have come to a joint resolution since this article was published. For more info scroll to the bottom of this post for links to their site which has up to date posts on the entire situation.]

"The Best, the Biggest...The Happiest 5k on the Planet" is how the Color Run likes to describe itself to its 2.6 million Facebook fans. But don't let that fool you. The company is suing 21 year old photographer, Maxwell Jackson, because he claims they used his photo illegally. Say what?

Jackson went to one of The Color Run events in Miami in 2012 with some friends from his photography club at Florida Atlantic University, where he is still a student. He photographed the event and posted the images online. He was then approached by Scott Winn, who identified himself as the Photo Director of The Color Run. Winn asked Jackson for permission to use his photos on their Facebook page and said that they would even give him "photo credit wherever (his) photos are used." As a new photographer, Jackson felt this would be a great way to get some exposure. "I was a new photographer and this amazing new company was offering to feature MY photos on THEIR page!" Who would have thought that would take a tun for the worse.

color-run-message

July of 2013 comes around and Jackson is walking around a Sports Authority in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (no where near Miami) when he was actually handed a flyer featuring HIS photos. On top of the flyer having his images on them without his consent or knowledge, The Color Run did not even give him credit for taking the pictures. Jackson even stated that they are still using his photos on their main websites, such as TheColorRun.co.uk, and even more international sites. Not cool (or legal?).

1008764_1392330910.7578_multi

The photos have also been featured in the U.S. News, Baltimore Sun Times, and by companies such as Coca-Cola. "There are thousands of individual websites all over the WORLD wrongfully using my photos as provided by The Color Run."

Jackson contacted The Color Run to try and receive compensation for the misuse of HIS photos. He instead received a response from Travis Lyman Snyder, owner and founder of The Color Run, which said he "would rather spend $500,000 on lawyers than be extorted by (Jackson)."

On top of that, according to Jackson, Travis Lyman Snyder filed a frivolous trademark infringement lawsuit against Jackson in Utah Federal Court, where The Color Run is centrally located, to sue him into submission. Jackson and his father worked "pro-se" (without a lawyer) on the case at first but then requested counsel from the state of Utah. On December 23, 2013, they received a letter that said their request for counsel was approved so now the clerk of the court would be finding Jackson a lawyer.  You can view the full filling here

"I now have pro bono counsel, which means I don't have to pay lawyers hourly for their time, however, I still have to come up with between $50,000-$100,00 in fees connected to standing up for my rights. These fees are expenses tied to the case, such as expert witnesses, copies, postage, stenographers, depositions, travel expenses, etc... Without this additional funding, The Color Run and their deep pockets will get away with infringing on the copyright and stealing my artwork."

As a college student, Jackson says he is already in debt with loans and there is no way he could come up with the money to fight this case along. He is asking for donations on his GoFundMe campaign to help raise the funds for this case.

UPDATE: Jackson reached out to me and gave me the reason for him being sued by The Color Run.  Here is what he said.  "About 5 months after I shot the race I was contacted by someone I knew that worked with a company that sets up, breaks down and staffs Color Runs. They asked if I wanted to work color runs and it sounded like fun and good money so I said yes. While working for Silverback (company I worked with) I made my fb employment status that I worked at Silverback and The Color Run. That is their filing on the case but they have also argued that because their trademark "Color Run" is in my photos they are entitled to them."

What are your thoughts on Jackson's situation, and how The Color Run handled the use of his images?

We have reached out to The Color Run for an official response and will update if and when one is received.

UPDATE: It appears many upset readers started commenting on their Facebook wall. Rather than attempt to delete them all (which was their initial move), The Color Run has just removed the ability to comment on their Page.

UPDATE: The Color Run’s owner and founder, Travis Snyder, has reached out to the Fstoppers team and sent us a response to his side of the story.

LAST UPDATE : "I want to sincerely thank everyone for their voices and support as we’ve worked through this issue. We have been able to reach a joint agreement, which meets the needs of maxxsphotography.com and The Color Run. We are happy to have avoided the drain of the legal system and look forward to the continued success of both companies.

As referenced in yesterday’s statement (written below), my hope was always that we would be able to reach a fair and mutually acceptable resolution. I am grateful that through this weekend we were able to resume discussions with Max and come to a solution.

I want to be clear that the recently resolved issues were never about The Color Run lifting and stealing images. From the beginning, we had a contractual “use” agreement with Max. We received high resolution, un-watermarked images for use online or in print.  The problems arose from a poorly worded, semi-verbal contract. We both had a genuine misunderstanding about the terms of our agreement when it came to photo credit on printed images. The recent negotiations revolved around finding a fair resolution to that misunderstanding.

Lessons Learned:

  • If you are a business, be explicitly clear about the use, compensation, and parameters of the agreement with the photographer when sourcing images.  Make sure it is all in writing in order to protect each other.
  • If you are a photographer, understand the level of access you are providing and also protect yourself with clear, written, release agreements.
  • Lastly, if a misunderstanding arises, enter into a respectful and ethical discussion about how to resolve the issue. In our new social/visual/online world, businesses and photographers need a great relationship more than ever. Assume the best in each other and make it work.

 

There is no doubt that the social media voices on both sides of the issue provided meaningful insight during this process. I sincerely appreciate those that presented thoughtful perspectives on the situation and how to resolve it.

-Travis"

[Images used with permission from Max's Photography || Original Story Via Max's GoFundMe Campaign]

John White's picture

John White is a photographer from Northwest Indiana. He specializes in individual portraiture. Outside of photography, John enjoys building websites for fun, doing graphic design, and creating videos. Also, he really loves Iron Man. Follow him on his social media profiles to keep up to date with what he has going on!

Log in or register to post comments
460 Comments
Previous comments

I posted this to their FB page and they took it down in 2 minutes. They should be ashamed on all counts. Cowards. Boycott

I wonder if they are gonna hire someone to work all weekend taking down comments.

Max doesn't seem to look like a victim a year later when he was still getting paid by the company. Seem like he forgot to mention all the details.

The color run is nothing more than a money making venture. It is not real competition. If you want to support a worthwhile cause, run local 5K's. You will be helping people in your community instead of lining the pockets of greedy bullies like the Color Run, Color Me Rad, Warrior Dash and other mega races. Yes they are fun, but at what cost?

They are furiously deleting posts to their Facebook wall so probably best to post on Twitter. @TheColorRun

i just posted on their dumb sock giveaway. we'll see how long my post stays :)

I hope he sues them into non-existence. I posted on their FB page of my disgust of them but I know it won't be up long.

This is just plain sad. If you take yourself and your company seriously even the tiniest bit you would know better that to slide down into childish behaviour like this. The worst PR ever! Time to boycot the color run :p

Gross.

Max, I hope the law rules on your side and you're able to hang these people out to dry legally. Trademarks should not be allowed to trump copyright.

Also, I had a thought: wouldn't something like a micro-loan fund be more appropriate than a donation box? If you do fight and win damages and expenses, shouldn't the donators/lenders be able to recoup their funds as well? Not to use your predicament as a soap-box, but if you win, you probably won't "need" a free 50k from the community. Right?

This is not about the situation, but there is a typo in the article. its the last word of the first paragraph.

Fourth last word

Because they logo is in the photo they are "entitled to them?" That's ridiculous. If that were the case the American government should be suing every film, photo, painting with an American flag in it. I know I might be off base, however, this nonsense with the Color Run is just getting my blood boiling. Alright, headed over the the FundMe page now.

absolutely sickening.

ok f*ck color run

I'm not one to usually get too involved in these cases, but dammit I'm so sick and tired of photographers getting sued!! brides, models, corporations etc. and they are 99% of the time complete BS!. Maybe Fstoppers should contact the young lady in the photo and let her in on what is going on and see if maybe she could contact "The Color Run"? Maybe a long shot but man this really angers me..

If I find any of my photos from last year being used in this manner, I will come after the Color Run owners in force.

Your photos arent good enough to be used. Dont kid yourself.

National Geographic disagrees with you.

they seem to be deleting every comment that is posted on their facebook page

I think many of these companies underestimate the strength and depth of the photography industry - not to mention this makes creative artists of all kinds upset. To use the image for commercial gain is wrong - but then to not own up to the mistake is infuriating.

That *is* an amazing picture, Jackson.

Don't just complain, donate to the fund. This could be you in one, five or ten years.

Shame on you Color Run! I used to support and promote it every year, no more!

This kid is just a greedy joke. He demanded $100,000 then upped his demands to $300,000 plus being named as the sole photography sponsor. Shame on Max for being greedy.

Their phone number is (855) 662-6567 and a real, life, human being picks up the phone. She sounds scared to death so I'm guessing I'm not the first one to call?

Kinda flubbed my donation quote, but I am with the photographer on this. Having been on both sides of stock images and licensing, this looks like a pretty clear case of improper use.

When publications ask for free photos, use a condom. Happy Valentines Day

You can't post on their Facebook timeline but you can still comment on their posts and photos. I'd recommend everyone copy and paste the link to this article in every post/photo on their page

That's what happens when "education" ends at the F-Stop!

When you make your photos available without a contract, a VERY specific contract/license, this is the result.

http://asmp.org/tutorials/licensing-guide.html#.Uv59lUJdUeM

I HOPE this kid wins, and learns a VERY valuable lesson. Our photos are our product, we're not charities. We didn't get our cameras, cards, tripods, cars, gas etc. for free. There is a place for charity, this isn't it. "Photo credit" is not accepted at any retailer.

The faster the masses realize this, the faster our industry can return to normal, and we can stop being abused by these awful people who feel entitled to our work, because "some of us" are handing it over without thinking about the consequences.

as a photographer and a runner I'm sad to say I have paid to run some of their races. I won't be running The Color Run anymore that's for sure. This is sick. New photographers are already extorted enough. Way to go Color Run for picking on a college kid (which sadly makes up about half of your volunteers). Very proud of this kid and his family for speaking out.

"Volunteers" is the new word for "slaves"! Who works unpaid? This is not a legitimate, DESERVING charity.

As a UT resident I am kind of disgusted with this kind of thing.

I have tweeted and emailed local News Organizations to pick up this story.

I also emailed Color Run directly to express my opinion as a local.

""To whom it may concern,

I am a Salt Lake City based photographer, a news story recently came to my attention in a case where The Color Run in Miami did contact an event goer via Facebook and did offer him photo credit in exchange for using images from that individual "on our facebook page".

It seems that your company then decided to use these images for various national commercial promotions without this being agreed upon by the photographer, nor the photographer being compensated.

This is very unsettling both as a Utah resident and a local professional.

I am reaching out to The Color Run, as a locally based business for some sort of explanation. And to suggest that The Color Run hold itself accountable for this situation, drop whatever frivolous lawsuit that may be in process against the photographer and appropriately financially compensate that same photographer for his time and efforts.

If the Color Run does not act responsibly, I will be recommending that local professionals not photograph any future Color Run events nor residents participate in any races. And that they use their time and money on another organization more worthy of it.

I would appreciate a speedily response.""

Logan

LmSorenson.net

Maybe you should ask Maxwell for the entire story before assuming the company did anything wrong... he has nothing to lose by creating a huge PR issue for them. He seems happy to be associated with the run a year later in this picture from his facebook page

Maxwell has posted his side. I reached out to the company for theirs.

Worded intentionally "it seems that your company" ...

As in I (don't) know. And I would like a response.

He posted part of his side. He shows the request that was made, but he didn't post his response to the request, or anything about the agreement that was made. Seems like that would be a smoking gun for him.

All he has done is drag their name in the mud on several websites. Then a bunch of other photographers did the same. It is sad that people are having that negative impact without having details.

First thing I did was look him up on facebook. Within minutes I see him in color run shirts like 10 times, including this one where he is wearing a staff badge.

I've taken pictures for this event in the past. I hate to see it get beat up by one person telling a partial story.

They did get back pretty quickly and linked the now available response from the company.

Stated

"Thanks for reaching out. This is a really important issue to us. Our founder has written a response, if you'd like to read it you can find it here:http://thecolorrun.com/689-2/"

Doesn't answer all the questions, but offers more than was available.

I actually did something I HATE after reading this article. I started trolling all over the Color Me Rad facebook page. I linked to this article on a bunch of their photos and asked if they had stolen those too.

Gah- I did the same thing, and I never do that! Passion with a touch of perhaps?

I tweeted about this and used #TheColorRun. It's appalling that they are doing this!

You don't think is appalling that this kid gave them permission to use his images in print and on the web (which he did) and that the only thing he's pissed about is that they didnt include his name on them? You also dont think its appalling that he demanded $100,000 and then tripled his demand to $300,000 after they had agreed on a rate of $30,000 but he had a change of heart at the last minute?

How much did Maxwell look for for the use of his images would be my first question - if he has gone to them looking for a ridiculous figure, then I can understand them hitting back in this manner. However, if his request was for proper and reasonable payment then they need to back off and compensate him.
They arent a charity, people dont get to run for free, and they wouldnt like if is we all started using their branding and logos and set up our own colour run events, So why feel its ok to take someone elses image for their use?

I thought about this too, but even if he asked for a million dollars, they'd still have to settle on something. It wouldn't be without precedent for this to result in a six-figure settlement.

Especially with copyright infringement being a minimum of
$750 PER instance (up to $30,000!). In other words, each and every flier, poster, website hit/download, not once for the particular work itself. If they printed up 1000 fliers with his picture, that is a minimum of $750,000, but could go as high as $30,000,000, and you can easily see them having made 10,000 or more fliers for just a single event, and how many events have they had that used it, dozens? It doesn't take a mathematician to see that as being a very high value, and we have not even gotten into the possibility of treble damages for willful infringement.

This is why they are suing him in an attempt to force a low settlement, as the risk of damages to them is astronomically high. Oh and you can thank the RIAA/MPAA for those damage values. I don't agree that it should be anywhere near the $750 minimum.

He asked for $100,000 as well as being named as the official photography sponsor for the rest of time, and to have his logo place on the corporate sponsors page of their websites next to Chevy. After talking with their lawyer they settled on $30,000 plus some shoutouts on social media, then at the last minute he changed his mind and decided that he now wanted $300,000 instead. He got greedy and they got tired of dealing with such an immature idiot. It really puts the comment about how they would rather spend $500,000 in lawyer fees than be extorted into context a little more.

That is disgusting.

lol for twitter @thecolorcrooks

What makes my blood boil is not (just) the behavior of Color Run, but the fact it will take tens of thousands of dollars to defend himself even if the lawsuit is frivolous. Defense is just too damn expensive.

If he got paid by Color Run to take the pictures, they are not his, they are theirs. And if he was working for another company, they are still not his, but they are also not the Color Run's. If Max was getting a paycheck by someone to take these photos they belong to the company. However, if Max was there on his own taking pictures to get practice or just because he wanted to make some photo art, they do, in fact belong to him. Just based on the statement Max gave, it sounds like he was getting paid by the Color Run or another company, in which case he has no right to the photos, even though he was the one to physically snap them.

He was being paid by a third party vendor to do set-up and tear-down, the photos had nothing to do with his compensation.

More comments