Five Times Bigger Than Full Frame at a Fraction of the Cost: The Mamiya RB67

Five Times Bigger Than Full Frame at a Fraction of the Cost: The Mamiya RB67

Have you ever wanted to shoot medium format but don’t know where to start? Have you been wanting to try shooting film but 35mm doesn’t seem like it’ll be enough? The RB is here to help. 


The Mamiya RB67 sets the standard for an affordable 6x7 medium format film camera. If you’ve never shot 120, it’s an incredible experience. Think of it like an all manual 35mm film camera that has so much more perceived resolution when viewing two photos at the same size, you’ll never want to go back. Coming in at nearly 5 times the frame size as full frame/35mm film, a proper 6x7 camera with a good lens can make anyone a fan. 

My experience with this camera has admittedly been somewhat limited by its size and weight. Until I got a smaller medium format camera, the RB67 was my go-to body but has been relegated to photos around the house or not far from a car. Nevertheless, it’s one of my favorite cameras and I won’t ever sell it. Lately, it’s been my camera for studio work and I couldn’t be happier with the results. 

The “RB” of the RB67 stands for “Rotating Back.” There are 3 versions of the RB: RB67 Pro, RB67 Pro-S, RB67 Pro-SD. The original model made its debut in 1970 and is probably the least common model as I’ve never seen one before. The Pro-S model came out in 1974 and saw a few improvements to the camera. Namely, they added an indication to the focusing screen that indicates whether the back is rotated into portrait mode or if it is still in landscape. While this may seem like a frivolous or unnecessary addition, it’s quite nice to have. The final model, the Pro-SD, was released in 1990; more than 15 years of the Pro-S started its production. 

Build Quality

If you’ve ever picked up or held an RB67, you know the camera is basically a fancy looking anchor. It is built to withstand the worst abuse you could imagine putting a camera through. And given that it’s 100% manual, it’ll work in even the most extreme conditions. The fact of the matter is that build quality is so good, it’s honestly the only thing worth complaining about for the entire camera. Ironic, no? Though I’ve thus far been lucky enough to not have to not have any issues with my camera, I’ve read on online forums that some people can have issues with the bellows. It does seem like the Achilles heel of the camera but I’ve never met anyone who has ever owned this camera and had this issue.

Accessories

Mamiya made so many accessories for the RB, the list is far too long to mention. There were a number of focusing screens (6 to be exact), waist level finders, prisms, magnifying hoods, grips to hold the camera, etc… Given that the camera itself is pretty inexpensive, you can set it up with just about any accessories you can find and still keep the price under that of what most other 6x7 cameras would cost. Though I’ve not done it before, you can shoot Polaroid film on this camera. It’s my understanding that this was how studios would have quickly checked the lighting setup prior to shooting but I’m not certain how true that is.  

Lens Offerings

Mamiya glass is fantastic. The standard lens that the majority of RBs come with is the 90mm f/3.8 C. This is the same the same lens that I have and I think it’s fantastic. The full frame equivalent would be 45mm f/1.9. This is not a focal length that I am used to on 35mm but have grown to appreciate on the RB. My second lens, purchased for using in the studio, is the 180mm f/4.5 K/L lens. This particular lens is the same optical formula as that of the RZ67 lens. Given the extremely shallow depth of field on this lens, nailing the focus can be a bit more difficult but it’s been wonderful to use.

Aside from the 2 lenses that I own, there are a great deal of them available. The more unusual ones include a fisheye lens, a shift lens, a zoom lens, a soft-focus lens, a few macro lenses, and a few APO options. While this is not true for all focal lengths, many of them came in 3 different models: C, K/L, or neither. Lens not distinguished as C or K/L are the oldest and tend to be the least sought after. The C lenses tended to have improvements to the optical formula as well as coatings. The jump from the C to K/L lenses I’ve read can be a big improvement or no improvement at all – depending on the lens. The lens that I’ve looked for the most is a 75mm f/3.5 K/L which is only available in the K/L series glass. 

What I Liked

  • Price (At the time of writing it can be had for roughly $300 in good condition)
  • Built like a tank
  • Lens offerings is great and the quality is superb
  • 6x7 format; it’s tough to beat
  • Easy to make multiple exposures
  • All mechanical

What I Didn’t Like

  • Built like a tank = weight of a tank
  • Almost too easy to make multiple exposures
  • All manual operation (If you’re comfortable with an off camera meter, this may well not bother you at all)

Conclusion

I cannot recommend the Mamiya RB67 Pro-S enough. For a first medium format camera, it’s tough to beat the value. You’d be hard pressed to find another camera of similar quality that produces 6x7 negatives and can be found for the same price as the RB. While I don’t use as mine as much anymore except as a studio camera because of the weight of the camera (and having lightweight alternatives,) I still use this camera a great deal and the photos I’ve taken with it over the years have been some of my favorite pictures I’ve ever taken. Even though I have two 6x4.5 cameras, the 6x4.5 back for the RB produces spectacularly beautiful photographs. 

Have you ever shot with a Mamiya RB67 in any of its 3 versions? What was your experience?

If you're passionate about taking your photography to the next level but aren't sure where to dive in, check out the Well-Rounded Photographer tutorial where you can learn eight different genres of photography in one place. If you purchase it now, or any of our other tutorials, you can save a 15% by using "ARTICLE" at checkout. 

James Madison's picture

Madison is a mathematician turned statistician based out of Columbus, OH. He fell back in love with film years ago while living in Charleston, SC and hasn't looked back since. In early 2019 he started a website about film photography.

Log in or register to post comments
157 Comments
Previous comments

Aye, it's possible, but there are more portable options out there that might suit me better. I owned a Bronica ETR years ago and that was very manageable so I'm looking at their 6X6 cameras as well because I was happy with my Bronica. 6x7 is tempting, obviously, and especially for the bargain prices of the RB. I'll decide in the coming months, there's no rush.

As much as I love a nice 6x6 camera, the 6x7 aspect ratio is nicer for making printing. With the 6x6, cropping enough to make an 8x10 or 11x14 print ends up with something roughly equivalent to a 645 negative.

Very nice. Love this camera. I still use Fuji GX680 and Hassy 500CM. Incredible shots when one know how to use them and expose properly. Would love to have the RB, but if my wife finds out I bought another camera.....it's all over but the funeral. Thanks for the temptation.

With those two cameras, I'm not sure where the RB would fit in your lineup. Seems like you've got the main MF bases covered!

What did the Mamiya RB67 say to the Hasselblad 500c. Answer I want to be a real camera like you someday.:) Why are people playing with this old junk. Let the past be in the past. What the heck is so wonderful about 120 roll film. It was a pain to load in to a camera and it still is. It was even worse to load it into a film tank to develop it. I love digital and just can fathom why anyone would want to use film..

"I love digital and just can (you probably meant "can't") fathom why anyone would want to use film"

Neat. No one cares.

Your comment doesn't make sense... Why are you referring to a hasselblad 500c, released in 1956 and compared it to a rb issued after 1970..? And then say to leave the past in the past?? 😂 😂 How do you know where you're going if you don't know where you're coming from?...
You might want to see a tutorial or 2 on loading 120 film as well. What's so nice about 120 a format created in 1901 that is 4.5 bigger than actual dslr ?hmmm...Maybe you also need to watch a couple of tutorials to learn about it as well..

I own a rb67 pro sd with a 90 K/L Lens and the rendering is just amazing. Yes, it takes 8 steps before taking a picture but viewing the result is so pleasing.
Getting back to basics in term of knowing your exposure, taking the time to focus and shoot is another idea of photography.
Even my wife and kids are viewing the pictures with another eye.
I just got tired of shooting 100 frames on burst mode to pick one good one.
With the RB, out of a roll of 10, 8 are perfect!
Its the best price ratio for sure. Comments on its expensive to shoot MF! Seriously? How many rolls will I shoot before spending the money of a phase one back?
Anyway, this idea of comparing digital and film is like comparing Paris with a town in the middle of Texas... Just not comparable....2 different worlds...

Well said! I'm glad to hear you like your RB. I've looked at replacing my 90mm with the K/L (I have the C version now) but hoping for a 75mm f/3.5 K/L.

Thanks James. The K/L is really sharp... When you don't forget to adjust the soft focus ring. I'm also looking at more lenses...but the 75 is pretty close to the 90 so more a 65 KL but hard to find at a good price... The 50 is probably the next one.

When you say the 'soft focus ring' are you referring to the floating lens element? My 90mm does not have one but I think the K/L version does.

All of the K/L glass is so nice... I keep an eye for them at every shop I go to but they're few and far between.

Yes I was referring to the floating element... I just keep forgetting to adjust it... Too concentrated on my framing!

I loved my RB67. Took some great pics with that camera. And with it mounted to my big Bogan tripod it came in handy in a street fight. Thing was built like a tank.

I very rarely ever have mine mounted to a tripod. I used to when I first started using it but the shutter release cable I had for it eventually broke and I haven't gone through the trouble of replacing it. Until such time as I do, any long exposure work is out the window.

Sitting next to me is my Mamiya Super 23 Press camera with three lenses, glass focusing back, two roll film backs and a couple of accessories. This camera takes the most amazing sharp images. Have the negatives scanned at high resolution and you can blow that up to the biggest pans with detail. The RB67 is a later version that competes with the Hasselblad. Both are sturdy workhorses. Not light but the tradeoff is in quality.

I've never used a Super 23 but another reader in a previous comment was speaking to the quality of it. Sounds like a great camera!

I purchased my RB67 pro S back around 2005. I have two lens the 65mm and 180mm. Have a polaroid back along with a 120. I didn’t like the waist level view so I picked up a prism view which also makes the image not upside down when looking through it. Have used the camera a number of times over the years. The local film lab I used closed up shop years ago so I haven’t used the camera much since then. I have looked for digital backs that are compatible with this camera but not much luck. It would be nice to see someone come up with some sort of DIY to attach a digital sensor to this camera.

I've been wanting to try out a 65mm on my RB for a while. How do you like it? I've also been wanting to shoot some polaroid film with the camera but even if I picked up the back, the film seems exorbitantly expensive. It would be awesome if someone ever did manufacture a reasonably priced digital back for it but I have serious doubts that will ever happen.

Yep. I got the RZ one with 140mm Macro lens. Just Phase matches to it.

I've been curious about the Macro lenses for the RB/RZ. The lenses are already so sharp, I cannot imagine how much more detailed the photographs would be with a Macro lens. How do you like yours?

Are we now supposed to start referring to medium format as "fuller frame"?

Ha! If that was the case, how would we refer to large format?

Mega Frame. Ultra Frame. Super-Duper Frame.
It's all silly. Any uncropped image, regardless of the film or sensor size is "full frame".

i had rz pro II i like it much more then my haselblad 503cxi , focusing is much much better and bigger frame make images pop up even more ... but but but ... cost of running medium format photo shooting is much higher then digital and not everyone is willing to pay extra ... film developing a professional scanning is extra additional cost a lot i mean a lot

I've not used that Hasselblad I'm not surprised to hear you liked the RZ more. It's a wonderful camera. As for the cost - it's why I primarily shoot B&W with it (home developing) and scan at home!

RB/RZ is a fantastic system - you can even use it as an SLR XPan :D https://www.instagram.com/stories/highlights/17930991103261014/

I had a friend make the parts I needed to shoot 35mm in the RB but I've only used it once and didn't love it. I went through what you posted but didn't see any of your results. You should share them.

There is a bit of them on the IG account, both with and without sprockets ;) I usually give tech data in tags.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bu4uoDgApQe/
https://www.instagram.com/p/BtD-sg8AqAb/

I must admit, it is a bit troublesome to change the film, as you need darkbag, but on the other side you have full 20 frames ;)

So you do. They look great! I should really give it another go - perhaps I will.

Good piece James as I follow your film travels. I love my Mamiya's

Thank you so much! What Mamiya camera(s) do you have?

I have the 645 with the 50mm & 80mm lenses, the 7II with a 80mm, the RZ67 with a 180mm lens. The 645 & the 7II goes out the most while the RZ67 does studio shoots

My greatest camera acquisition is the RZ67 + 110mm and 180mm SB lenses. I got the kit for an absolute steal and managed to acquire the viewfinder, grip, flash trigger and spare backs. I also got the polaroid back and 10 packs of the fp100c. I spent around £1200 for it all and today its worth around £2500. These things are great investment items

Sounds like you got a great deal! I'd agree - the price of these cameras is just going up and up. I'm jealous of your 10 packs of the instant film! It's become prohibitively expensive the last couple years.

I absolutely love my RZ Pro II. That mirror triggering is just musical to me. I just shot a roll of CineStill 800. What fun!

Let me know how your like the Cinestill. I just finished off my 3rd roll of it this weekend. Interested to know your thoughts.

Just the shutter sound of this camera is worth two Sony A7 Rxyz lol

Ha! That's a lot of value on the sound of a shutter!

I recently got an RB and exposed a test film. The film is unusable ... overexposed. Now I wonder what went wrong. The light seals all look clean. The back seems to be okay too. The bellows has no visible damage ... I'm a bit baffled. greetings from Switzerland, Adrian

Are you sure about your exposition? Did you use a light meter? I have overexposed film when I r forgot that the roll was 400 Iso and I exposed it as a 100 Iso ! I always put the type of film. On the back windows now!
The shutter being in the lens can be the issue. With older lenses, they can have a issue with the leaf shutter due to old grease and the time can be off. Try with another lens.
Good luck.

Thanks for your quick reply Karim. I mounted different lenses on the same film and had to measure them with a handheld exposure meter. Additionally controls the exposure with the digicam. At least one picture should give something. But the entire film is white (negative), so more than just a little overexposed. During the same period I exposed a film with a Horseman and an old Yashica. There have been more or less good results.

Sorry to ask you a stupid question but how did you load the film? Could it be you put the paper side on the outside while it should be on the inside?
Also did you try with a different back?

Your shutter may be sticking, or need tension adjustment. Have the shutter mechanism checked out, it may need a cleaning, lube, and tension spring adjusted.

If the camera was stored cocked the stretched tension spring may have lost some tension, which gives you slower (longer) shutter speeds at any setting, especially the faster ones.

Your explanation sounds extreme, and there may be another reason why you're getting such overexposure, but I would still have the shutter checked out.

That's quite strange. A couple questions and forgive me for starting from the most basic. Are you absolutely certain that your film was 100% OVERexposed and not 100% underexposed? Can you possibly post a picture of the film (not cropped or inverted or anything - the film as you can hold it in your hands)? If it's at all possible that you completely underexposed them, there is probably a more simple solution to your problem. If in fact they were completely overexposed, you've got a very bizarre problem on your hands.

If you're certain that all of your frames are completely blown out, can you verify that they are in fact 100% blown out? Given how much it takes to actually blow out color negative film, I would have thought you would be able to tell if the shutter is open for way too long. And if you're shooting even a mildly high contrast scene, what would normally be underexposed should give some detail even if you accidentally shot 10 stops over.

I wouldn't be TOO concerned with light leaks from the back or bellows unless they are just pouring in light and you're not keeping the darkslide in when you're not shooting. From my experience, light leaks from the back or bellow tend to show up as weird patterns on the film - not uniformly across the entire negative.

Lastly - what kind of film were you shooting?

Good point, if they're negs, are they clear of full d-max? If clear the shutter may not be opening. If D-max, the shutter may be stuck open.

Also, is the film commercially developed or developed at home? Lots of variables here.

I love my RB67. It's a joy to shoot and always produces good results. I actually bought a graphic 22 6x6 back for mine because I don't love 6x7 format.

But I almost never shoot it anymore. At the end of the day, my Intrepid 4x5 setup is far lighter weight while offering more resolution and lens movements at the same time. And if I ever wanted to shoot a smaller film format, I could easily get a roll film back for it. When I'm going to be carrying the camera around a lot, it just makes sense to go with the weight savings at the cost of convenience of use.

Interesting. I've been borrowing a 4x5 for about 6 months now and I can't use it enough. As much as I love the added resolution and the novelty of it, I don't get it out as often as I should. I use my RB far more.

The Intrepid trades away all the buttery smooth geared movements and the sexy Tachihara/Wista type appearance for... plywood. The camera itself weighs almost nothing. I've found the negatives don't much care what the camera is made out of, as long as it's light-tight. If I was a hardcore architecture photographer or something, maybe the lack of convenient fine-tune controls on the movements would bother me. But I shoot nature and haven't had any trouble getting the movements aligned how I want them despite the controls being a little rougher. For me it makes sense. If you're having fun shooting your RB instead, by all means keep shooting it. They're awesome cameras.

This one was with Mamiya RZ67 and 140mm Macro lens. I had cropped it square for Instagram. I mean I don't think my Nikon D-850 can give me nice skin tones like this :D - Kodak Portra 160

Depends on how well you know image editing.

More comments