More Posts in: Minimalism, Abstract, Experimental (and more...)
Atacama desert, Chile
Views from Atacama desert, Piedras Rojas and Valle de la Luna
Sand Porn
I really enjoy creating something different with drones. I've had the Mavic now for about four weeks and I absolutely love it.
Single Light Headshot
Client came and needed headshots immediately. Set up a single Broncolor Para 133 in the dining room. Delivered 20 pics. Setup, Shoot, Edit and delivered within 30 minutes.
Mananciais da Serra, Piraquara, Brazil
This is a water reservoir for the city of Curitiba, Brazil
An invitation
Yesterday, this bird seemed to invite the sparrows to take a bath.
3 Comments
DOF depends on your aperture Andrew - the higher the f-stop the greater the DOF (at perhaps the expense of increased distortion at the higher f-stops).
(Single) spot focus may help ensure focal point in these conditions, otherwise if you're up to it you can use a tripod and focus-stack a number of frames and merge in PS if greater DOF is your goal.
Remember the old days where camera has a DOF button and lenses had DOF setting engraved on the barrel?
Yeah, I knew that one factor in calculating DOF is aperture, but it was late when I posted and simply forgot to mention these were all shot at 300mm, 1/1000 second, and f/6.3.
Obviously, when walking Harry it is not realistic to use a tripod. I don't have any experience with focus stacking, but I've thought that when the weather gets a little better I would get back to the Tango, carry more equipment, and do some experimenting.
The answer is about half an inch.
Yes, a tripod, a different f/stop, and focus stacking all would have helped, but they were all impractical under the circumstances.
The original post was not about being ignorant, it was about being too lazy to do a Google search or walk downstairs and look up the formula.
Here is a link to another "too lazy" source.
https://dofmaster.com/doftable.html