Saved it to watch for lunch today! Thank you, Alan. I had posted a thread on another forum with my own samples (and where to get much better information - alanbrownphotography.com). Might post this link too. I was amazed at how little photographers knew about the technique.
Thanks so much for posting this link Andrew. I am a big fan of Alex, and not aware of this new video.
The concept of leveraging the capabilities of the camera to capture what we don't see with the naked eye is an interesting approach.
The norm is to think of the camera as something that capture reality, but really, Alex rightly points out we should be thinking of a tool that goes beyond that.
Hopefully this will inspire you/others to view the camera in a different light, as it has me.
One thing jumped on me, watching Kilbee's movie: often the subject is moving only while the camera is still. In today's ICM photographs I often see everything blurred by
a) camera movement + maximum burst rate and stacked in post.
b) still subject and moving camera with stacking in post
quite strong differences.
Yeah, there are so many variations of camera movement throughout the techniques used for ICM. That is what makes it so interesting and suited to creativity.
Saved it to watch for lunch today! Thank you, Alan. I had posted a thread on another forum with my own samples (and where to get much better information - alanbrownphotography.com). Might post this link too. I was amazed at how little photographers knew about the technique.
Thanks for the PR Jenny. Whereabouts did you post?
Thank you Andrew. As with Ms. Jennifer, Tagged for later viewing. 👍
Thanks so much for posting this link Andrew. I am a big fan of Alex, and not aware of this new video.
The concept of leveraging the capabilities of the camera to capture what we don't see with the naked eye is an interesting approach.
The norm is to think of the camera as something that capture reality, but really, Alex rightly points out we should be thinking of a tool that goes beyond that.
Hopefully this will inspire you/others to view the camera in a different light, as it has me.
One thing jumped on me, watching Kilbee's movie: often the subject is moving only while the camera is still. In today's ICM photographs I often see everything blurred by
a) camera movement + maximum burst rate and stacked in post.
b) still subject and moving camera with stacking in post
quite strong differences.
Yeah, there are so many variations of camera movement throughout the techniques used for ICM. That is what makes it so interesting and suited to creativity.