Hi, first post here.
I did three shots, 4s, 8s, 15s, then merged them together as HDR. I processed the output filt in three ways:
- The first image is the "cleanest" - or the most similar to reality.
- The second one is contrasty.
- The third one is contrasty + B&W.
Which one do you like more? I love the third one.
Have you ever used HDR with long exposures? What do you think about it?
Cheers
Hiking in this beautiful region is like a present.Also standing at high elevation and looking to the king of Austria.The first snow the changing coloursand all the combination with the weather cond
One of my favorite waterfalls I've photographed in recent years. deep in the backcountry of Vancouver Island lies this pristine oasis.
These are a highly endangered species, and the rescue center has this young male tiger, which they hope will breed with their already existing female Malayan tiger.
A new arrival at the rescue center. She was very friendly and very flirty, rolling about on her back and meowing, then staring at you as if she might be hungry. A magnificently beautiful animal
1 Comment
Hi
first of all, i don't do HDR anymore (meaning using a dedicated sotware)
I do exposure blending quite often, but when it comes to flowing water, i don't use it onthe water.
When I shoot water, I always try diifferent shutter speeds. And there is ony one look that settle on. Using hdr would mix that look with others, create artefacts or unwanted effects.
So choose a shutter speed, and develop from that base
And in your example, I would have use a faster speed (1/2sec to 1/10sec) to really emphasize the water flow