I am reluctant to try to clone out the tree at top left, because doing it right looks like a lot of work. On the other hand, it would be better if it weren't there. How intrusive do you think it is? Is it worth the work?
I am reluctant to try to clone out the tree at top left, because doing it right looks like a lot of work. On the other hand, it would be better if it weren't there. How intrusive do you think it is? Is it worth the work?
Hi Dennis, removing the tree on the left should be quite easy if you select it with a lasso tool and then fill with content aware.
Nice image and the light on the tree is beautiful.
thasks, i will look into content-aware actions...
Since you ask, Dennis - yes I think it draws the eye in all the wrong ways. It detracts from an otherwise rather mysterious and starkly appealing image. Hope it isn't too much work! I'd do it. It might leave a subjective void, and if so I might be inclined to crop off a little off the left and bottom of the image to rebalance it.
I agree with others - the tree definitely tugs the eye and detracts from what otherwise would be a wonderful image.
If using PS you can try content aware fill, but the spot healing brush/clone tool may be needed where branches intersect. I often find that a combination of tools are needed in these types of situations, but I'm no expert.
I also agree with Chris's cropping suggestion to better balance the image. I have included a quick example just so you can use as comparison (always use what suits your own taste).
Just what I was thinking. Ideally, I'd like a bit more room at the top, so the tree doesn't touch the edge, but is surrounded by sky. This too could be "faked" with content-aware fill, for those so inclined. Never touch the stuff, personally. ;-)
Too true Chris, my thoughts exactly. I would definitely expand the top a bit (rectangle marquee, content aware fill) and if successful play with the crop.
I don't feel it needs much but a little headroom might help.