Fisherman or NO fisherman?
I generally don't like people in my landscapes unless they're very distant and provide scale to an image. I like the boat in this image but have an exposure where I think I can blend the fisherman out if desired. Thoughts?
More Posts in: Landscape and Nature Photography
Hector Reyes
Leopard spots and high heels
I've photographed Ady a few times now. We get better each time as a team. This image was a fave from our latest session. I hope you like it to.
1
Last: Oct 16, 2026
Alan Brown
New website post
Just a heads up for anyone that may be interested (and as things are slow in the group.....).
Hector Reyes
Leopard spots and high heels
I've photographed Ady a few times now. We get better each time as a team. This image was a fave from our latest session. I hope you like it to.
Hector Reyes
Leopard spots and high heels
I've photographed Ady a few times now. We get better each time as a team. This image was a fave from our latest session. I hope you like it to.
David Cohen
Up, Close, and Personal
Available and natural light only, classic boudoir shooting in a fin de siècle hotel.
1
Last: Oct 09, 2026
5 Comments
i think that the boat does not add to the shot. if it was further in the frame it would have a purpose but as it is it looks like you have been photo bombed
Well put!
For me the fisherman in his boat tells the story of the shot. I'd keep him. But then I'm a fan of this kind of fishing and the tranquility it can bring, much like photography.
My vote is for "no fisherman" - cheers.
No fisherman if anything it takes away from the shot. My eye goes right to him sticks out a bit too much for my liking.