There are many opinions and pieces of guidance imparted to new photographers. Many show up regularly, like how you should “make” photos rather than “take” them. Some of this advice is helpful, while other pieces might crush your creativity. Following the advice to avoid one common technique may unintentionally stunt your growth without you even realizing it.
The Questionable Approach
“Spray and pray” has become a ubiquitous term in photography circles, often encountered for the first time shortly after picking up a camera. It describes the technique of shooting as many frames as possible, often of varied subjects or compositions, in the hope that one turns out to be exceptional. While the phrase could be viewed as a neutral descriptor, it has taken on a near-pejorative tone, becoming shorthand for a lack of skill or intention. Many photographers, whether hobbyists or professionals, view the approach with a mix of disdain and frustration.
The phrase carries a weight that can subtly influence how we approach our craft. On the surface, the advice to avoid this technique seems like a reasonable suggestion to adopt a deliberate and thoughtful methodology. I believe this is how most photographers think about it. However, the implicit criticism within “spray and pray” can discourage experimentation and exploration. For beginners, the term may feel like a warning: avoid this technique at all costs or risk being branded as someone who doesn’t understand or appreciate the artistic side of photography.
The Impact of 'Spray and Pray'
There are undeniable benefits to the cautionary aspect of “spray and pray.” Focusing on intentionality in your photography and promoting careful consideration of composition, lighting, and timing before pressing the shutter are undoubtedly positive messages. This mindset can foster a greater connection to the scene and contribute to the satisfaction of capturing a well-executed shot. It can help ensure we’re telling the story, in a manner of speaking, and expressing our artistic vision.
However, the phrase also comes with a high cost. Actively avoiding “spray and pray” can instill a rigid need to achieve “the” shot, creating an all-or-nothing mentality. This pressure might lead to an unyielding focus on achieving flawless compositions, making photography much more stressful than it needs to be. Stress hinders creativity, and so the risk here is that a negative spiral develops: as the pressure of capturing “the shot” increases, photographers may feel worse and worse about their abilities, eventually questioning their pursuit of the art form altogether. Failed compositions become evidence of ineptitude rather than part of the natural process of learning and improving. For many, this can stifle the willingness to try new techniques or explore unfamiliar subjects and styles—essential elements of growth in any creative pursuit.

It’s worth reflecting on whether the term influences your own approach to photography. The idea of “spray and pray” might be subtly shaping your mindset, leading you to avoid compositions where success feels uncertain or out of control. You may unconsciously hold back from taking risks, fearing that a more exploratory approach could be perceived as unrefined or unintentional. At the same time, you might overly fixate on capturing perfection in a single frame, creating unnecessary pressure and detracting from the enjoyment of the process. Recognizing these potential influences is the first step to understanding whether they align with your goals as a photographer or if they are limiting your creative growth.
Consider how many professionals practice their photography. Their final portfolios showcase extraordinary precision and artistry, but the reality is that they take far more shots than they ever share. This is not a bad thing! A wildlife photographer, for instance, may shoot hundreds of frames of their subject to capture the perfect moment. Photographing seascapes or any moving water may yield a similar haul of raw images to get the desired shutter speed and effect.
While digital photography allows us the leeway to shoot as many frames as we need, trying different options is not new. When hiking up Half Dome, Ansel Adams brought 12 plates. He used three plates on a composition of Mount Clark during the hike up, two of which were ruined by the wind moving the camera. He made another four images before reaching his final location. He used three more plates there, using two to try out different compositions. With only two plates left, Adams turned his attention to Half Dome. He took time to set up his composition and made one image using a yellow filter. Feeling the yellow filter would achieve his desired effect, he used his last plate, this time with a red filter. It is only the last of these 12 plates that has become an iconic work: “Monolith, The Face of Half Dome.”
The key takeaway is this: It is unrealistic to think you’ll nail every shot in one attempt. A remarkable and robust body of work is built on iterations of “misses”—not failures, but stepping stones in your photographic journey.
A Different Approach
Instead of shying away from taking numerous shots, consider embracing a playful or experimental mindset without worrying about how many photos you’re taking. Play, at its core, is about engaging in an activity for its own sake without regard to the outcome. It’s something most photographers naturally gravitate toward, whether professionals or hobbyists shooting out of pure enjoyment.
Injecting playfulness into your photography can be as straightforward as you’d like it to be. Maybe it’s picking a location and wandering around it without a specific goal in mind, photographing whatever happens to catch your eye. Maybe it’s choosing one element to focus on when you go out, such as textures, shapes, or shadows. Maybe it’s choosing one subject and creating as many different compositions of it as you can. There are plenty of ideas online or in books if you need some help getting started.
If play feels too frivolous, consider approaching it more in terms of experimentation. Ask yourself “what if” questions and let your camera help you answer them. What if you moved so your subject was backlit? What if you changed your aspect ratio? What if you tried a vertical orientation rather than horizontal? What if you got low or high? What if you slowed the shutter to exaggerate motion? Experimenting isn’t about perfect results; it’s about learning what works—and what doesn’t—for you.

Even when an experiment succeeds, don’t stop there. Push further and try other approaches. Understand the consequence of each change on the photograph. Think about how you feel about that impact. The process can help you refine your photographic approach or discover new directions you’d like to pursue. For me, blending this methodical testing with artistic exploration builds a bridge from my analytical brain to my creative one. It can provide a framework for approaching a given subject intentionally while still allowing room to play or experiment within those boundaries.
Conclusion
Adopting a playful or experimental mindset can liberate your photography from the pressure of achieving a specific result. Yes, you will take more frames, but that’s not inherently a bad thing. By shifting focus from a narrow product or outcome to the joy of exploration, you might discover not only more satisfaction in the process but also a surprising boost in your creativity.
So, the next time you head out with your camera, let go of the fear of being labeled as someone who “sprays and prays.” Instead, take those extra shots, try something unexpected, and see where the journey takes you. Photography, in a very real way, is about discovery—not just of the world around you but of yourself too.
I totally agree. Trying to fit digital photography into the constraints of film photography makes no sense. Okay, there's nothing wrong with thinking more critically about the shot before clicking the shutter. However, by making a variety of images from different positions or any number of other variables, it provides the photographer with ample material for analysis when back at home and evaluating which composition works better, and for what reasons. Sorry, but for even the most experienced photographer, the best composition may not be so obvious at first. I can't tell you how much I've learned from having analyzed 20 different pictures of the same thing on my computer. Often the differences are so subtle that it would be unreasonable to expect that I should have made only one exposure to get the best.
Your three photos of the park bench are a good example. I might have approached it the same way. After having frozen half to death shooting this scene, I can make a more rational analysis of how I respond to each in the comfort of home on the computer. My inclination when shooting is to get closer to the subject, so my eye probably would have seen something closer to your last image. But then that image doesn't convey much emotion to me. It's simply a close-up of a bench. However, the first one which I may have only taken as an afterthought conveys the emotion of being there. I can see myself sitting on that bench, maybe feeling the loneliness and melancholy of a bleak winter day. And I'd be looking at that picture on my computer and wondering if it might have been improved by elevating the camera position slightly in order to separate the bench and background trees just a bit.... giving the image a little middle ground. We can learn so much from taking those additional pictures.
Very well put Ed Kunzelman! When out in the field, I find it's best to lean into creative play and experimentation, leaving the more critical thinking for later. And I agree that being warmer can really help with that. Thanks for the comment!
Excellent advice. Learning photography is an iterative process, and we learn more from our failures than our successes. Failing often can be a winning strategy. It can also help to get lots of feedback about which images are failures. They might not be the ones we expect.
I agree Jacques Cornell! And each image that doesn't work gives us the chance to think about what doesn't work for us, and how we might have fixed it or might do it differently the next time. It's very hard to learn without giving things a try!
"Spray and Pray" connotes that there is no thought behind any of the images taken. I agree that taking hundreds or thousands of photos with no thought given to anything is a fairly foolish practice.
The type of open-minded experimentation that you suggest in this article is not spraying and praying. You seem to be suggesting that the photographer puts thought into how to take a variety of different types of images, and then not be afraid to shoot a whole bunch. That is not spraying and praying at all. That is shooting with intention.
Personally, I hate spraying and praying and think it is mindless. But I love shooting hundreds and hundreds of frames in a loose way that is not too "tight" or picky about how each frame is shot. I think there are some people who may use "spray and pray" in a way that is not completely consistent with its literal definition, and semantic sloppiness can lead to inexcusable misunderstandings.
Thanks for the comment Tom Reichner! And I agree with you, "spray and pray" does typically mean shooting without intention. That is (or should be) different than shooting many frames. I do advocate here for a more intentional approach that would not generally be called "spray and pray."
I'm also advocating for not worrying about being labeled as someone who sprays and prays. I believe many folks early in their photographic journey hear the advice to avoid "spray and pray" and internalize that as taking too many frames of the same scene, regardless of intentionality. It's something that caught me. So while those of us with more experience understand it as a narrower term, and would never call out someone for working a scene or taking many images of wildlife to get the gesture(s) they're looking for, it can absolutely be a trap for others and can stunt growth.
When you photograph anything or anyone that moves it is usually necessary or a huge benefit to take multiple frames and when the light is low and the shutter speed drops even more so.
Too bad the phase "Spray and Pray" is taken and has become negative - maybe we can get people to call it "Hold, Seek and you shall Find". With live music I usually use 7fps as even stationary "boring" musicians constantly are using their hands and turning their heads. With my style that yields 3-4 frames to pick from but not necessarily any keepers if the person is moving fast or someone in the near proximity is making a mismatched expression. I have live music samples if anyone is interested.
Great point Alex Petterson! I love your idea for a new term that best represents that approach. Thanks for the comment!