Why Every Photographer Should Consider a Half-Frame Camera

Why Every Photographer Should Consider a Half-Frame Camera

Half-frame cameras are seeing a burst in popularity. Here are six compelling reasons to add one to your arsenal.

The number of vintage options combined with new offerings from the likes of Lomography and Pentax means that now is an excellent time to venture into the world of half-frame cameras. Whether you are a film aficionado or taking your first tentative steps into the world of silver halide, here are three reasons to get started.

1. Meaning In the Mundane, Emotion In the Everyday

Like most of us, I capture images on my phone almost every single day. And, like most of us, I hardly ever look back at what’s in my photo roll because those images feel disposable and are thus forgotten in an instant.

For me, having a half-frame camera has brought a new meaning to the everyday images that would otherwise live on my phone and remain unseen. Having a small, convenient camera that’s always within reach suddenly means these snapshots have a new significance. I need to wait to see the results, and once my negatives arrive in the mail, I spend an hour or two scanning and editing in the hope of finding something magical. I’m yet to be disappointed.

If I'm walking the dog and suddenly the light does something spectacular, I used to reach for my iPhone. Now, it's my ancient Olympus PEN EE-2.

As a result, I have images that have taken on an extra layer of meaning. Not only do they exist in the physical world as something real, tangible, and enduring, but I’ve invested a significance in them that gives them value. The everyday no longer disappears instantly into the cloud. Instead, the photos are seen and felt. My iPhone images are ephemeral, while my half-frame photos become an archive.

My EE-2 is not exactly consistent, unfortunately. It might be time for something a bit more reliable.

2. Limitations Breed Creativity

Having restrictions imposed upon you means that you have to innovate: working within a set of limitations requires you to experiment and play with different approaches, exercising the creative part of the process. This can then bleed into other parts of your practice, expanding your brain and opening you up to new ideas.

Not quite what I intended but suddenly multiple exposures of the day-to-day is something I want to explore further.

Half-frame cameras come with a plethora of restrictions, but the potential for play is huge — diptychs, panoramas, and pairing images can be novel ways of thinking about how to create photographs.

3. Quality Is Not an Issue

Not only is half-frame photography an opportunity to stop obsessing over lens sharpness and megapixels, but the quality is absolutely fine — especially when you consider that all but a tiny fraction of our images are only ever seen on a screen.

When it first arrived, I tested the PEN EE-2 with a roll of Kodak T400 CN that had been sitting in the attic for 20 years. Worrying about grain must be incredibly boring.

Plus, if you print, how big does it need to be? The last time I printed images from my phone was years ago, and even then, they were a handful of inches across. Half frames print acceptably up to 8x10 inches, and the character more than makes up for any lack of clarity. And how often do you hear someone say, “I love this photo, but I wish it didn’t have so much grain”?

4. The Price

You don’t need me to tell you that shooting on film is not cheap. Budget black-and-white film — Fomapan 400 or Kentmere PAN 400 — costs me about $9 for a 36-exposure roll, plus around $10 to send it to a lab and receive a set of developed negatives in return. That’s almost 53¢ per image, rising to just under 65¢ if I opt for an affordable color film such as Kodak Gold.

A half-frame camera can manage more than twice as many shots. As well as doubling the number of exposures, the diminutive size of a half-frame camera means that the distance between the film canister and the take-up spool is so small that you’re not wasting a load of frames each time you load the film.

72 shots guaranteed. A handful more if you're lucky.

If you’re keen to achieve maximum efficiency, consider the Alphie Tych, whose users claim to get 81 exposures from a standard roll of 135 film. That brings a roll of black-and-white down to less than 24¢ a frame. Bargain.

5. Portability

Half-frame cameras are tiny. Admittedly, not as small as a compact digital, but still plenty small enough. Having a camera always within reach — especially one that feels so good to use, that makes you want to use it — will help you to develop as a photographer, find new ideas, and discover projects.

Admittedly, the vintage half-frame cameras of the 50s, 60s, and 70s are not the lightest, however. My beautiful Olympus PEN EE-2 fits into a jacket pocket, but its aluminum alloy body gives it a heft that means I can’t forget it’s there.

6. They Are Beautiful

Look at it. It's gorgeous.

The vintage half-frame cameras are almost all beautifully designed, the Olympus PEN range in particular. Thankfully, Pentax didn't stray too far from the fold when designing the Pentax 17, giving us something that makes you want to pick it up and start taking photographs.

I bought my PEN EE-2 on eBay, and it shipped from Japan to my home in France in just a matter of days. Somehow, it's in incredible condition (just one tiny section where the leatherette has started to come away), despite being older than me.

So Which Camera to Buy?

There’s a wealth of secondhand options out there. In the last year or two, we’ve seen half-frame cameras at both ends of the scale, including serious toys from Lomography and the excellent Pentax 17. For a deeper look, check out this article. Or you could always modify a 35mm camera by matting half the frame and, upon completing 36 shots, swap to the other half and run the film through again.

What do you love most about half-frame photography? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Andy Day's picture

Andy Day is a British photographer and writer living in France. He began photographing parkour in 2003 and has been doing weird things in the city and elsewhere ever since. He's addicted to climbing and owns a fairly useless dog. He has an MA in Sociology & Photography which often makes him ponder what all of this really means.

Log in or register to post comments
9 Comments

It’s not for me. I take daily walks and always take my EOS-R , with the 50 1.8 it fits in my pocket. When I get home, I process the images, post them on Instagram or the memorable ones get a spot in the photo book of that year. But if you have fun with it, and it sparks your creativity, that’s great.

Every photographer should also consider using an 8x10 view camera. Those with any sense will decide realize the ridiculousness of both options.

Or at least 4x5 i.e. 1/2 frame ;)

My most-used cameras are 8x10. I love the "ridiculousness" of it, whether on film, alt process, or wet plate.

I looked into a Pen EE2, for the same reasons you bought one. However, I ended up going a different direction. I bought a “toy” digital camera from CampSnap Camera.

Yes, it’s plastic construction with a single-element plastic lens instead of metal construction with a multi-element glass lens. Beyond that, user experience is very similar to the Pen. Fixed focal length lens, fixed focus, in focus range roughly 1 meter to infinity, program auto exposure, optical viewfinder, 4:3 image aspect ratio, the only controls on the camera are the shutter button/power switch and the flash on/off switch (the flash is pitiful, low-light photos are better with no flash) no way to see your photos until you connect the camera to a phone/tablet/computer and download them. Image quality at the image size/viewing distance pairs of digital displays is, to my eye, quite comparable to the examples of photos taken with film half-frame cameras.
Bonus points for a new camera at about half the cost of a “refurbished” Pen EE2 on ebay.

Since photos taken on film generally get scanned and displayed digitally, as you do, I don’t see the point of adding the costs of film/processing/scanning to the process. One can be just as intentional taking photos of the everyday with a simple digital camera and later reviewing them to find the few that captured something magical as one can be with a simple film camera.

Wow has this site sunk to the absolute bottom of the barrel.

Haven't we had enough of these every photographer should articles? The only thing every photographer should do is have a camera and take photos. All of these articles are clickbait tripe.

I think you even have to know that considering the percentage of photographers who will ever do this latest greatest dumbest take is way less than .01%

I'm trying to imagine what it must be like to get so triggered over this. You know you don't have to click on the article, right?

"The only thing every photographer should do is have a camera and take photos."

OMG get off the internet. You're not ready for it.

USSR camera Chaika 2 - 10$ on ebay )