We Review the 2025 Mac Studio: The New Performance King

We Review the 2025 Mac Studio: The New Performance King

Craving a Mac that tears through demanding projects without crowding your desk? The new Mac Studio with M4 Max aims to be your next power-packed desktop, merging blistering performance with a compact form factor that sits discreetly on any workstation.

Introduction

Apple’s Mac Studio line caught everyone’s attention when it first appeared with the M1 series. It offered surprising speed in a squat, silver enclosure—smaller than a typical tower but larger than a Mac mini—designed to slip neatly into busy desktops. Now, the new Mac Studio takes that concept forward. That means you can crunch data, edit high-resolution images, or slice through 8K video timelines without taking up half your office space. The approach focuses on integrating the CPU, GPU, and memory into one system-on-a-chip, reducing latency and boosting efficiency. If you’re coming from an Intel-based Mac, the jump in raw speed can be significant. If you already own an Apple Silicon system, you’ll see how the M4 generation refines what Apple started with the M1 and M2 lines, pushing performance while retaining the Mac Studio’s hallmark quiet cooling design.

In this review, we’ll walk through every aspect of the Mac Studio with M4 Max, from its design and build quality to its performance under real-world loads. We’ll compare it to older Macs and talk about where it fits in Apple’s product range. We’ll also dig into its ports, thermal management, upgradability, and how it handles specific creative, analytical, and coding tasks. If you’ve been eyeing a small but mighty Mac desktop, read on.

Comprehensive Specs and Configurations

Below are the main specs for the new Mac Studio lineup, focusing on both M4 Max and M3 Ultra options. These may vary slightly by region, but this list covers the core build-to-order possibilities you can expect.

Chassis and Dimensions

  • Form Factor: Compact desktop enclosure

  • Dimensions (W x D x H): Approximately 7.7 inches (19.7 cm) square, 3.7 inches (9.4 cm) high

  • Weight: Around 5.9 pounds (2.7 kg) for M4 Max configurations; may be slightly heavier for M4 Ultra

Processor (SoC) Options

  1. Apple M4 Max

    • CPU: 14-core or 16-core

    • GPU Configurations: 32-core or 40-core

    • Neural Engine: 16-core Neural Engine for machine learning tasks

  2. Apple M3 Ultra

    • CPU: 28-core or 32-core

    • GPU Configurations: 60-core or 80-core

    • Neural Engine: 32-core Neural Engine

Unified Memory (RAM)

  • M4 Max: 36, 48, 64, or 128 GB unified memory

  • M3 Ultra: 96, 256, or 512 GB unified memory

  • Memory Bandwidth: Up to 819 GB/s

Storage (SSD)

  • Base Options:

    • M4 Max: 512 GB or 1, 2, 4, or 8 TB

    • M3 Ultra: 1, 2, 4, or 8, or 16 TB

  • Read Speeds: Up to ~8 GB/s (tested)

  • Write Speeds: Up to ~5 GB/s (tested)

Graphics and Video Support

  • Up to 5 external displays supported with M4 Max

  • Up to 8 external displays supported with M4 Max

  • Hardware-accelerated H.264, HEVC (H.265), and ProRes encode/decode

Ports and Connectivity

  • Front Ports:

    • 2x USB-C/Thunderbolt 5 (up to 120 Gbps, depending on chosen SoC)

    • 1x SDXC (UHS-II) card slot

  • Rear Ports:

    • 4x Thunderbolt 4 (up to 120 Gbps)

    • 2x USB 3 (USB‑A) ports (up to 5Gb/s)

    • 1x HDMI 2.1

    • 1x Ethernet (10 Gbps)

    • 1x 3.5 mm headphone jack

    • Power inlet

  • Wireless:

    • Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)

    • Bluetooth 5.3

Operating System and Software

  • Comes with macOS (latest version)

  • Apple silicon-optimized apps supported natively

  • Rosetta 2 for Intel-based app translation

Environmental

  • Recycled aluminum enclosure and magnets

All these configurations share the same general exterior. If you opt for M4 Ultra, you’ll see more cores, higher potential RAM, and a heftier price tag. The M4 Max is usually more than enough for most creative or power tasks, unless you handle extremely demanding 3D or scientific workloads at scale.

Design and Build Quality

If you’ve seen the earlier Mac Studio, the new version looks nearly identical on the outside. It’s a 7.7-inch square block with gently rounded edges. The top surface is bare aluminum except for the Apple logo. The unibody construction gives it a sturdy feel with no visible seams. That single block of metal also acts as part of the thermal system, drawing heat away from the internals. The Mac Studio is tall enough to house a sizable cooling assembly, but still short enough to slide under many monitors or stand unobtrusively next to them.

In terms of weight, you’ll notice the Mac Studio feels dense if you try to move it around. Inside are cooling components, a power supply, and Apple’s system-on-a-chip. The fan intake runs around the base, pulling cool air through the internals before pushing it out the back. It’s a design that Apple tested with the M1 and M2 versions, refined again for M4. The chassis remains resistant to smudges and scratches.

Setup and Everyday Use

Setup is just like any other Mac. You plug in a monitor (or two, or three... or four or five), attach a keyboard and mouse, and connect the power cable. Press the power button, follow a few on-screen prompts for language, Wi-Fi, and Apple ID, and you’re ready. The system boots quickly, thanks to those fast SSD speeds. macOS comes preinstalled, and you can restore settings from an older Mac via Migration Assistant if you prefer.

In day-to-day use, the Mac Studio aims to give you workstation-class performance without the bulky tower. If you’re used to a laptop, you’ll immediately notice how snappy everything feels with the M4 Max’s raw CPU power. If you come from an older Intel Mac, the difference can be dramatic, as it was for me moving from the top-shelf 2018 Mac mini to the M1 Mac Studio. Even with a half-dozen demanding programs open, the system remains responsive. That’s partly due to the large unified memory pool, which keeps background apps in RAM without heavy swapping.

Noise levels remain low for light tasks like web browsing, email, or streaming media. When you push the CPU and GPU simultaneously—say, batch-exporting high-res photos while editing video in another app—the fans might ramp up. They produce a steady whoosh rather than an annoying whine, and they do a decent job of moving hot air out the back. The enclosure gets warm, but not unbearably so.

Performance

The M4 Max integrates a 16-core CPU, balancing high-performance and efficiency cores. My Geekbench 6 tests clocked in around 4,100 for single-core and 26,300 for multi-core performance. That places it well above many competing systems. Single-core speed matters for tasks like web browsing, basic app usage, and certain coding processes that don’t parallelize well. Multi-core shines in video encoding, large data merges, deep editing, or 3D rendering.

Apple’s system-on-a-chip approach means the CPU, GPU, Neural Engine, and memory controller share a unified architecture. Data doesn’t have to shuttle across different components or rely on a separate VRAM pool. This design reduces latency, which can make a big impact if you’re tackling GPU-accelerated tasks or switching frequently between CPU-heavy and GPU-heavy apps.

The user experience feels smooth and consistent. If you’re compiling code or editing video that uses all 16 cores, you can still run other apps in the background without severe slowdowns. The operating system’s ability to manage tasks with Apple Silicon remains a key strength.

Graphics Performance

The M4 Max can be configured with either a 32-core or 40-core GPU. My test system had the 40-core version. This GPU performance places it squarely in the realm of high-end discrete graphics cards in many scenarios, especially those optimized for Apple’s framework. For video editing, 3D modeling, or motion graphics, you get more headroom than you might expect from an integrated design.

Real-world workflows show the GPU can maintain stable clock speeds over prolonged loads. If you’re rendering 3D scenes in Blender or doing motion tracking in After Effects, you don’t suddenly drop to half speed after a few minutes. The unified memory also helps with large assets, since the GPU doesn’t have to request data from a separate memory pool.

Applications like DaVinci Resolve, Final Cut Pro, and Adobe Premiere Pro see direct benefits. Timeline scrubbing in 4K or 8K is perfectly fluid, and applying color corrections or transitions can feel close to real-time. If you do a lot of GPU-driven tasks like real-time effects or advanced color grading, the 40-core model is appealing over the 30-core. If your GPU usage isn’t that high, you could save money by dropping down.

Memory and Storage

The Mac Studio’s unified memory option can go up to 128 GB with M4 Max (512 GB if you choose the M3 Ultra). That alone is a big deal if you work with huge image catalogs, complicated multi-track audio projects, or large codebases. Traditional systems with separate CPU and GPU memory can bottleneck if you run out of VRAM on your graphics card. Here, the GPU and CPU share a massive memory pool, and the system dynamically allocates it.

Storage starts at 512 GB for the M4 Max base configuration, though many folks will opt for 1 TB or more (you should). Apple’s SSD speeds remain some of the fastest in consumer desktops: about 8 GB/s read and 5 GB/s write in typical work. That means your computer boots nearly instantly, large projects load quickly, and saving multi-gigabyte files doesn’t keep you waiting.

There’s a downside: you can’t upgrade the internal SSD after purchase because it’s soldered. If you’re on the fence, it’s often wiser to configure slightly more storage at the outset. External Thunderbolt drives remain an option, and they can be quite fast, but they often won’t reach the integrated SSD’s throughput.

Ports and Connectivity

With the Mac Studio, Apple continues to offer a healthy range of ports, striking a balance between modern and legacy connections:

  • Front: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (or USB-C), 1x SDXC (UHS-II)

  • Back: 4x Thunderbolt 5, 2x USB-A, 1x HDMI, 1x Ethernet, 1x Headphone jack, and the power inlet

Thunderbolt 6 supplies up to 120 Gbps throughput, letting you attach external SSDs, docks, or even multiple high-res displays. If you rely on older peripherals, the two USB-A ports run at up to 5 Gbps, enough for standard external drives, keyboards, or dongles. The SDXC slot on the front is convenient for photographers and videographers who need to offload footage quickly.

Wireless connectivity includes Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 for faster, more stable links with modern routers and accessories. In practice, it worked extremely well. I easily took advantage of my 1 Gbps internet over Wi-Fi.

Real-World Tests: Photo Editing

Of course, this is what you're probably here for. Like previous reviews, I gave Lightroom the same task: exporting full-size JPEGs for 235 edited raw and TIFF files, each coming in between 35 and 45 megapixels.

The exporting test took 17 minutes and 48 seconds on my 2018 Intel Mac and made it unusable for any other tasks. On the M1 Mac Studio, the same test took only 3 minutes and 39 seconds, making it almost 5x faster. On the M4 Max, that dropped to 2 minutes and 48 seconds. What's important to remember is that I'm comparing the M4 Max to the M1 Ultra, the Max being the lower tier and the Ultra the upper, costing twice as much for the same generation. That means the $2,000-level chip is now outperforming the $4,000-level chip from less than three years ago. That's impressive. In addition, despite the maxed-out usage, the fans made no audible noise, the case barely felt warm, and the computer was still plenty usable for other tasks during the export.

I saw similar performance gains in Photoshop. Even the most complex files and advanced filters rendered instantaneously, and that's what I love about the Mac Studio: its speed means you never get caught waiting, so you never interrupt your creative flow.

Real-World Tests: Video Editing

Editing 4K or 8K video can stress any system, but the M4 Max hardware encoders and GPU cores take a lot of that load. In Premiere Pro, playback remains fluid, and scrubbing through a timeline with multiple color corrections or transitions is generally snappy. This is thanks, in part, to Apple’s specialized ProRes encode/decode blocks built into the chip. If you frequently export projects for clients or online platforms, hardware acceleration shaves minutes or even hours off the process, compared to older machines. Multi-cam editing stays smooth, especially when working with a modern SSD and plenty of memory.

Real-World Tests: Large Data Analysis and Coding

Data science workflows can benefit from parallel CPU performance, ample memory, and fast storage. Python scripts using libraries like NumPy or Pandas can load large data sets into memory without frequent reads from disk. R users can run complex statistical models and keep multiple data frames open. If you do big merges, sorts, or transformations on CSVs or database dumps, the 16 CPU cores handle them efficiently.

Apple Silicon chips also include machine learning accelerators, which can help with certain ML frameworks that have been optimized for Metal or Apple’s neural engine. If you rely on CUDA-accelerated libraries, you’ll need to see if there’s a Metal equivalent or a CPU-bound fallback. For training advanced deep learning models, you might still prefer an NVIDIA GPU if your software is locked to CUDA. But for many mainstream data analysis tasks, the Mac Studio with M4 Max is more than capable.

How fast is it? I've been working on a massive project that involves a very large Python program ingesting about a million data points and running tens of millions of rather complex mathematical calculations on the set. It's the kind of thing I wouldn't even both running on my old Intel hardware because it would be too frustratingly slow (on the order of several minutes) to yield results for one run. Running an iteration on the M1 Ultra was fast, taking about 15 seconds. On the M4 Max, it was even faster, on the order of 10 seconds. And I could run iteration after iteration without thermals bogging the system down, which is crucial for a system like this that will probably be used by professionals frequently pushing it to the limit.

Thermal Management and Noise

Speaking of thermals, Apple placed large fans inside the Mac Studio. Cool air is drawn in from vents around the underside, and warm air is exhausted through a wide grille at the back. Under modest workloads—like browsing or light photo editing—the system is nearly silent. You only hear a gentle hum if you put your ear close. If you're like me and you place your computer on the shelf below your monitor, you won't hear it at all.

When you push the M4 Max to its limits in CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks, the fans ramp up, but the noise remains a controlled whoosh rather than a small fan’s whine. The top of the enclosure can get warm, though not dangerously hot. That being said, it's not a laptop, so the temperature upon touch isn't really a concern, but anecdotally, it shows the cooling system is doing its job well. 

Price and Configurations

The entry-level Mac Studio with M4 Max  starts at $1,999 with 36 GB of unified memory and a 512 GB SSD. As you tick up to 64 GB or 128 GB of unified memory, or choose a 1 TB or 2 TB SSD, the price climbs. Apple’s SSD upgrades aren’t cheap, but because storage isn’t user-upgradable, some professionals find it worth investing upfront. The top-tier M3 Ultra starts at $3,999 with 96 GB of unified memory and a 1 TB SSD.  If you’re a professional who bills clients for hours, shaving time off each project might justify the expense. That being said, for the majority of users, I recommend opting for the M4 Max model and bumping up the unified memory and SSD. For example, the 16-/40-core M4 Max with 64 GB of unified memory and a 1 TB SSD costs $2,899 and should keep you happily speeding along for years to come.

Like other Apple Silicon Macs, the Mac Studio’s RAM and SSD are not user-accessible. You can’t add more memory or swap in a bigger SSD later. That means you must choose the right configuration from the start. If you’re unsure, lean toward higher memory if your tasks are demanding.

On the flip side, Apple typically supports its machines for several years with macOS updates and security patches. The Mac Studio’s robust CPU/GPU combination should remain competitive for a good while, particularly if you run software optimized for Apple Silicon.

Who It’s For

The Mac Studio with M4 Max fits professionals or enthusiasts who need high performance in a small footprint. Video editors, photo pros, 3D artists, data scientists, and coders will see real gains. If you do advanced tasks—like handling 8K timelines, building huge codebases, or editing multi-gigabyte composites in Photoshop—this machine can save hours of waiting.

Key Takeaways

  • Compact Form, High Power: An extremely powerful SOC and plenty of unified memory in a box that barely takes up desk space

  • Unified Memory Architecture: CPU and GPU share a large pool, eliminating separate VRAM bottlenecks

  • Fast SSD Speeds: ~8 GB/s read and ~5 GB/s write reduce load times for big media files and data sets

  • Robust Port Selection: Front USB-C/Thunderbolt ports and an SDXC slot add convenience

  • Quiet Cooling: Even under heavy loads, the fans remain more of a steady whoosh than a high-pitched whine

  • macOS Optimization: Natively supports Apple Silicon apps, with strong performance across many creative tools

Conclusion

The new Mac Studio with M4 Max builds on the success of earlier models, cramming serious performance into a neat, desk-friendly enclosure. You get rapid CPU and GPU speeds, generous unified memory, and some of the fastest SSD read/write rates around. That makes it a compelling choice for video editors, photographers, developers, and data analysts who need a reliable, powerful Mac without stepping up to a huge tower. The upfront cost is higher than a Mac mini, yes, but you'll also enjoy better future-proofing and a computer that can keep up with the most demanding creative workflows. If your projects require consistently high performance, the Mac Studio delivers a compelling blend of speed, efficiency, and quiet operation that’s tough to match in such a compact form.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based photographer and meteorologist. He teaches music and enjoys time with horses and his rescue dogs.

Log in or register to post comments
1 Comment

The benchmarks of greatest interest to me, aside from basic export times, are building 1:1 previews and applying AI Denoise in Lightroom Classic and processing DeepPRIME noise reduction in DxO PhotoLab, as these are the biggest bottlenecks in my high-volume high-ISO event workflow.

On DeepPRIME and 1:1 previews, I got almost the same times from M1 Max Studios with 24 and 32 GPU cores. OTOH, the latter was about 25% faster at AI Denoise.

FWIW, DeepPRIME was 2x faster than AI Denoise.

With DeepPRIME 3 cranking out about 9MP/s, I don't feel the need for anything faster, as this lets me export 800 images from a 4-hour fundraising gala in about an hour.