Hey what do you think of the expression of the model?
Se mote of my work here:
https://500px.com/photo/126797621/katrin-by-marcus-ekman?ctx_page=1&from...
Natural light
Hey what do you think of the expression of the model?
Se mote of my work here:
https://500px.com/photo/126797621/katrin-by-marcus-ekman?ctx_page=1&from...
Stunning. Well executed.
The shoot was good, then u added a really not invasive and good post production, a bit of Dodge and Burn, some sharpening for eyes..its' good!
Will have int on my mind for the next image!
I think you have a very good photograph of a lovely girl but you ask about the expression. I suspect you feel the same as me, it does not work 100%. I don't really know what is wrong, something very subtle but it negatively effecting the image.
Why two copies of the picture, above? I can't see any difference. maybe just getting macular degeneration but they look the same to me.
I think you have a very good photograph of a lovely girl but you ask about her expression. I suspect you feel the same as me, it does not work 100%. I don't really know what is wrong, something very subtle but whatever it is, it is negatively effecting the image.
On a different topic, my impression is that her face has been well "airbrushed" but I suspect the girl needed less photoshopping. What I am saying is I think you have done a very good photoshop job but 10-15% less woud have been perfect. That's high praise by the way.
Why two copies of the picture, above? I can't see any difference. maybe just getting macular degeneration but they look the same to me.
Ye I was intressting to se what you would think of it. Sometimes you are your worst enemy.
Well it is probably 2 images because of the link to 500px
Probably 10 to 15% less because of the image Size i little on this site. But il have that in my mind for the next retouch!
It is a very nice portrait photo, but a bit too shallow depth of field that makes the left side eye slightly out of focus and for a hair aficionado like me I would the hair to be more clearly defined without the slight blur.
Okey thank you!
Well I am like the shallow depth of field!
And I have not bought a 85mm f/1.2 lens to shot it at f/5.6. This image i think is shot at f/1.8. And the background would have been al lot more distracting.
As always it is always a compromise and a personal preference and you as the photographer is the final authority!
Is good, but her clothes are out of place, she is with make up , but her earings and her shirt is out of place, imagine her with a more glamurous or fancy clothing . She would look stunning.
Awesome work Marcus. Stunning capture, her expression is natural.