Are Godox Lights for Professionals?

Are Godox Lights for Professionals?

There are two types of opinionated photographers: those who love Godox lights and those who feel Godox lights are not for professional use. Here are some considerations for whether the Godox system is for you.

Just as we use our professional judgment in choosing the right lenses and other gear for the job, we must also use our judgment in choosing which lighting system is best for our own workflow, regardless of which system is the top of the line. For example, a 4-wheel drive vehicle will take groceries home from the grocery store just as easily as a 2-wheel drive car can, so if you are never driving in the mud or in the mountains, it doesn’t matter which vehicle you use. The same is true of lighting. If you can do your job to 100% capacity with one set of lights, that’s all you need to look at.

Here are a couple of popular YouTube channels from outstanding educators who discuss why you should use brands other than Godox.

John Gress: Elinchrom

https://youtu.be/C-I5gpWhE2s

In a recent video, John Gress, who admits that he has never owned or used a Godox light, explains why he doesn’t believe Godox lights are for professionals. The name of this video has changed from calling Godox lights "disposable" to "not professional." He states that Godox lights are disposable because, if they ever break, you just throw them away and buy a new one instead of repairing it. The same can be said about anything though, from a Ferrari to a speedlight. If the cost of repairing it exceeds the cost of buying a new one, you just buy a new one. If not, you repair it.

To support his opinions, Gress focuses primarily on the cooling system by referencing certain pages in the manuals. With Godox lights, the manuals reference the number of times you can fire the flash at full power in rapid succession to activate the heat protection settings and before you experience a delay in recycle time. With the Godox AD200, it is 40 flashes at full power in rapid succession.

He states in his video: “I’m almost certain that anyone using these Godox lights is probably damaging them as they are using them.” And referencing the Godox AD200, he said, “So let’s say that after the period of use, maybe 3- 5 years, that Godox light is probably going to be not functioning because you, like a normal photographer, were shooting more than 40 pictures at full power in that time frame before it overheated, and damaged the light.”

I’m not sure exactly which type of photography would ever require you to shoot 40 full-power shots on a 200-watt light in rapid succession, let alone on such a regular basis that you are continuously putting stress on your bulbs and destroying them. If you were ever going to shoot dancers, or action sports, or anything where you need to use flash in rapid succession, you would use a more powerful light at a lower power so that you could get the faster recycle time. A Profoto B1X (500 watt light) has a recycle time of 1.9 seconds at full power, and .1 seconds at its lowest power. So, if you need fast recycle time for shooting in rapid succession, regardless of light manufacturer, you wouldn’t ever use a flash at its full power. You’d use a flash twice as powerful or four times as powerful as what you need, and then shoot it at a lower power to be able to take advantage of having a flash recycle time that matches your camera’s ability to take rapid shots.

So, the assumption that “normal photographers” do this on such a regular basis, and that if they used Godox, the lights would probably not work in three to five years, is probably a huge stretch. But it’s easy enough to prove. The AD200 been out since 2017, so you can do a quick Google search to determine if one of the most popular off-camera flash systems on the market has seen a surge in bulb deterioration to the point that they stop functioning entirely after three years.

Gress further speculates that because the $40 replaceable bulb on the AD200 will deteriorate to the point that it stops functioning, the entire body of the AD200 must also completely deteriorate, rendering it worthless and requiring replacement of the entire unit every three years. He explains that Elinchrom lights would typically lose about $300 of their $900 value in three years, so it’s an equivalent financial investment to buy Elinchrom. The Elinchrom One, for example, is $900, and it is the closest equivalent to the Godox AD200, only it is only about 60% as powerful, being a 131-watt light vs the 200-watt AD200.

YouTuber Wes Perry found that it took about 5 minutes of continuous firing on the AD200 when firing the AD200 at 50% power to begin to see a lag in recycle time. Another option for the same price as an Elinchrom One, would be to buy a 600-watt Godox AD600 Pro, and fire it at ¼ power to match the output of the Elinchrom One and get a recycle time of about 6 flashes a second at that lower power.

Shot outdoors in burst mode to capture the waves crashing with an AD600pro at 1/4 power.

So, what does this all mean? The entire argument about inadequate cooling is only relevant if you are a photographer who regularly shoots 40 frames in rapid succession on full power on a regular basis. If that describes your workflow, then this is an important consideration. If you have $900 to spend, you can choose to either get the 131-watt Elinchrom One or a 600-watt AD600 Pro from Godox. With the Godox light, you’d have a much more powerful light with a larger battery that would give you more options for shooting, and still allow you to continue to take pictures continuously every second for a long time.

If you absolutely cannot use a 600-watt light because it is too big and you carry your gear in a fanny pack or just in your hands, and you regularly shoot over 40 frames in rapid succession on full power, then this is solid advice and you should consider whether the Elinchrom lights are better suited for you.

Miguel Quiles: Westcott

Miguel Quiles does a thorough review of the Westcott 400-watt FJ400 light and calls it the best light if you are just getting started. The Westcott 400 watt light is very close in specs to the Godox AD400 Pro. If you buy a light and a trigger, the Westcott light comes out a little cheaper than the Godox light, but one Westcott trigger will work on all major camera brands (you need a $20 adapter for a Sony because of their strange hot shoes). So if you ever switch camera brands, you might have to replace all your lenses, but at least you won’t have to buy a new $60 trigger.

The other advantage of the FJ400 is that you can use it while charging the battery. The AD400 has an AC adapter, but that costs extra.

My biggest concern about the Westcott system is that they have such a limited lineup of flashes. Currently, they have an 80-watt speedlight, a 200-watt strobe, and the 400-watt strobe. Godox, on the other hand, has several speedlights, a 100-watt strobe, 200-watt, 300-watt, 360-watt, 400-watt, 600-watt, 1200-watt, and a 2400-watt strobe. The 200-watt strobe also has available an adapter so that you can combine two 200-watt strobes to make it into a single 400-watt light.

The Importance of a Wide Selection

I began in lighting with a single speed light. When I learned how to bounce light and modify light, and then wanted to learn two and three-light setups, I bought two AD200s and the adapter, which allowed me to take pictures outside more comfortably. Later, I needed stronger lights to expand my skillset and the types of photographs I could offer clients, so I bought two AD600s. Mostly, I shoot indoors, but because I live in a city known for its perfect weather and beautiful beaches, I occasionally get asked to shoot outside.

Shot outside in the afternoon with the Godox AD600pro

When I shoot outside, I would primarily use my AD600s because I either need as much power as I can to balance with the ambient light, or I need to be able to take more shots and I want to be able to shoot at a lower power and have a longer battery life and faster recycle time. I chose to get the AD300 for that because it is the size of an 85mm f/1.4 lens, and it has much smaller batteries than the AD600. Because of its size, I wouldn’t have to worry as much about having it tip over and be top-heavy when shooting outdoors. I could bring the light and several batteries in a bag smaller than the size of an AD600 with one battery. It was portable and powerful enough for virtually every outdoor shoot. The AD200 was not powerful enough for all my applications. The AD400 was a little too big for me. I had several choices and got a light that worked perfectly for me. As I added new pieces to my collection, they all worked with the same trigger and I was able to expand without having to abandon the pieces I already had.

If you grow and want to be able to expand your lighting, it helps to be in a system where you have multiple choices. Right now, the strongest studio light that Westcott makes is the FJ400. It came out two years ago. The FJ200 and the FJ80 came out about a year ago. It’s a tiny selection that is not really growing at a serious pace for a company looking to compete. I would be worried about buying from a line of lights with so few options. It just kind of looks like Westcott wants to keep their toe in the water of strobes and see where it goes, like what Microsoft did with the Zune.

Fstopppers: Profoto

Almost three years ago, Lee Morris compared the Godox AD400 pro to the Profoto B10. He found that there were some categories where the B10 won and somewhere the AD400 won and concluded that the AD400 is the obvious choice for the majority of people. For example, the B10 had better flash durations in freeze mode, but lost color accuracy compared to the AD400 shot in regular mode.

One of the common critiques I hear a lot when comparing the Profoto and Godox lights is that the Profoto is built like a tank with a much higher build quality. If you are in a situation where you need to have a light that is built like a tank, then that should be an important consideration for you. I am primarily a studio shooter and my strobes are not usually subject to hazardous conditions, so having lights built like a sturdy jeep as opposed to a tank is adequate for my needs.

Another common issue that I hear is that Godox lights are made in China, so it’s impossible to get any customer service. Godox lights are rebranded in the United States as Flashpoint and sold exclusively through Adorama, where you can get your customer support through Adorama. They have a phone number and an email for customer support specifically for Flashpoint systems.

Profoto users also talk about how they have to use Profoto because that logo impresses people and lets them know you are serious. They say that if you go to a commercial shoot with anything other than Profoto lights, the creative director or art buyer will laugh at you and wonder if you are a real photographer. Again, if you are in the small subset of photographers that works with people who would laugh at you if you had anything less than Profoto, then you should definitely only get Profoto. But if you are shooting weddings, high school seniors, food, products, cars, test shoots for modeling agencies, events, or any other line of photography where the client doesn’t see or care what kind of light company you are using, then it really doesn’t matter.

Should Professionals Use Godox Lights?

As I stated in the beginning, professionals who are charging money for their work should use their best judgment in which lights they should use. If you must use a small battery-powered light only, and you need to use it at full power over 40 times in rapid succession on a regular basis then you should definitely look at the Elinchrom lights.

If you need lights that are built like a tank and impress people, then you should really look at Profoto. If you need lights that were thoroughly tested with various light meters and color accuracy tests and found to be almost identical to Profoto lights but at a fraction of the cost, then look at Godox.

I have never seen a picture that was only made possible because it was shot using a certain lighting company’s lights. I have never seen a photo that was better because one light brand was used over another. I have never seen a picture and immediately been able to tell that there was a Godox light used or a Profoto light used. I challenge anyone to show me a picture and show me that it was only possible or that it was even made better because it was shot with a certain lighting company’s lights. No one can do it.

You might travel a lot and therefore you need one company’s sturdiness. Or you do something where you need another company’s ability to shoot full power on burst with a low-power strobe. Or you might not care about the scalability of your system. There are lots of considerations you need to take into account when choosing a lighting system that is going to help you make money. Godox lights are most certainly lights that can be used by professionals in many genres.

If you're passionate about taking your photography to the next level but aren't sure where to dive in, check out the Well-Rounded Photographer tutorial where you can learn eight different genres of photography in one place. If you purchase it now, or any of our other tutorials, you can save a 15% by using "ARTICLE" at checkout. 

Jeff Bennion's picture

Jeff Bennion is a San Diego-based portrait photographer specializing in boudoir and fashion photography. He owns Ignite Studio, the prettiest studio in the world. He is also an attorney licensed in California.

Log in or register to post comments
122 Comments
Previous comments

Of course, but there is a difference between needing that much equipment and how Jeff views pros as bragging using 30k of ws power.

When I see a lot of her videos she usually has an assistant with Phototek light on a boom or arm. Maybe the other 29 were to impress the client :)

I would guess the client was already impressed!
Of the 30 packs probably 5 or 6 never were used, they were extras.

As I understood from Art Streiber (a very impressive photographer for PR/marketing/poster imagery) sometimes the stars like Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio have very limited time windows for gallery shoots.
I remember he wrote something about shooting a poster and Brad Pitt (or someone else) had 20-30 minutes for all the setups combined (I think it was 5-7) because Pitt had a lot of press to do.

So they only had one choice:
Instead of rearranging each setup with the same gear, they ordered - let's say - 7 setups with 4-5 packs each and prelit a whole day with doubles on huge soundstage. So everything from stands to sandbags, heads and packs was times 7.

The next day was the shooting day and they "just" had to photograph the talent for 2-4 minutes on each set and they had a digi cart on rollers and would just move along from set to set. And in 20-30 minutes everything was done. And they did that for multiple actors.

So I guess sometimes the amount of equipment does not neccessarily speak to the ego of the photographer but the circumstances of the shoot. And I guess "Annie" plays in a league where time is money - at least with big stars - so it is probably cheaper to clear half of the rental house than to wait for setting up and taking down the gear for each setup.

This is a great example. Professionals with the right budget will just organize and rent the necessary equipment and space to make the shoot work cleanly and efficiently. In general, Art is just an incredible photographer all around, both in creation and production logisitics.

I personally use Godox myself and have nothing against any other brand. It's just my AD600Pro is wildly convenient being able to switch between an AC block for mains power to a Battery. And otherwise, it maintains perfect color accuracy and speed. I've considered Profoto's B10 Plus recently, but can't get over the recessed flash tube. It's those little things that make me choose one over the other.
With that said, I just recently did a shoot where I used Profoto lights from a studio I was renting with my Godox lights by mounting the Air Remote on an X2 trigger. So if I need to rent for a shoot I can do that (since practically every rental house has Profoto), but I don't have to personally buy Profoto if that doesn't suit my lighting preferences.

Thanks to outstanding godox xt2 controller I can use blowfoto and godox togrther. Also the bulb heads on ad200 r so much more useful and effective.

Yes. We do also gallery shoots of actors and it is incredible how enormous the time constraints are. We shot Antonio Banderas, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Caine or Emma Thompson and we literally had 3 minutes to complete the shot. Not time to build another setup.

Although we do not have those big sets as Art Streiber does but we sometimes have to light more than one setup and so we have to order more equipment to make it happen.

We sometimes shoot all over Germany or Europe and the good thing about Profoto is that their equipment is available in almost all rental houses in Europe (and the US) which makes it very easy for us.

We shot mainly with Hensel but also Profoto, Briese, Elinchrom and Broncolor which are all great and reliable. But in my home studio I use Rollei strobes which are essentially Jinbei (or "Westcott" in the US). They are great too.

BUT I just ordered a AC adapter for one of those Rollei/Jinbei/Westcott strobes and I was sent 3 different units and they ALL failed to work. Just a simple AC adapter. I sent them all back and now I have to wait months for a secondary battery.
THIS is also a problem with "disposable" strobes. The manufacturing quality sometimes sucks.

But we had also had Profoto strobes fail. One Hensel pack "exploded" and an Elinchrom strobe did not work properly. It also depends on how the rental house (and its clients) use and take care of their gear.

Yes, that's what they do, the celebrity sits down for make up then goes from set to set and are gone quickly. I was just glad I never had to pack that order or check it back in.
She would also rent multiple RZ67 bodies and lenses and a ton of backs because she would shoot different films for different looks.

You should follow Art Streiber on instagram. I don't know him personally but he explains and shows in detail the final retouched images and a lot of BTS material. It is a great resource.

I guess Annie works similarly. And I have seen BTS video of her too and she always swaps her bodies and does that very fast with a few assistants. I guess if you are a celebrity you have a great experience because it is a well oiled machine running in the background.

This comment made me laugh so hard

Amateur can mean 2 different things, someone who produces professional quality results without pay or someone who is incompetent in a specific endeavor, so speaking of the latter, professional equipment in the hands of an amateur still produces amateur results. The equipment someone uses is irrelevant to skill knowledge and experience.

Well said. The idea that so many of the people writing for and commenting on these forums that the title pro really means much of anything with regard to skill or need is laughable.

To me the best tools (lights) are the most flexible one can get. I am a one person operation and hire assistants from time to time. I don't have a problem with Godox, never bought any but looked at it once for secondary system in crowded places, but didn't pursue. Because I shoot a variety of things, I created an inventory that allows me to shoot about anything, short duration, HS, low power, high power... Basically I cannot say no to a job opportunity because I know I have the tools and back up. Doesn't matter the brand, it's all about planning in my opinion.

I enjoyed John's videos, but certainly not this one.
It reminds me of the debate of "Pro photographers only use FF system".

I just want to say also that I have been messaging with John all morning and he is a super nice guy and I have always loved his content.

Thank you for correcting the record, Jeff. I own a "pro" brand of lighting and also use Godox. One is a knife one is a fork. I use either when it is appropriate. For the longest time(since around 2014) I wanted an AC powered version of B1/x so I could leave shoot all day or leave the modelling light without worrying about battery power. Godox introduced an AC/battery version around the same time as the super-expensive B10 and I did not want to spent 10k to have the choice of AC/battery. Adorama had a really good deal on the AD400 and I ended up buying it. Fast forward abotu 3 years and I am still using it and have made back my investment 100x. I also purchased the AD200 and while it doesn't take me 200 continuous flash photos at max power i'm glad the ad600 and ad1200 and ad2400 are available for those who substitute praying-and-spraying for skill.

What a wacky article!

"...the creative director or art buyer will laugh at you and wonder if you are a real photographer. Again, if you are in the small subset of photographers that works with people who would laugh at you if you had anything less than Profoto, then you should definitely only get Profoto."

This comment is absurd as the creative director and art buyer ALREADY HIRED YOU to shoot the job! If they are "laughing at you" they are laughing at themselves FOR HIRING YOU.

Interesting how shooting cars was stuck in the any brand will do category with model head shots and high school seniors when car photo budgets are one of the highest in the industry.

Profotos are great because they are a good product and can be rented or repaired world wide.
But not everyone wants or needs Profoto.

And the "expert" who never used Godox but knew they would wear out in 3 years SMFH.

I purchased godox in the past and wasn't impressed for shooting weddings with too many misfires. I went with Nanlite Forza 500 and a Nanlite Forza 60 for hair light(I have a 300 for backup). I turn it on before the reception and even though it lights up the dance floor the images looks so good and everyone can see the couple. I also needed this for adding hybrid photo/video packages. Added bonus, no one has a seizure.

Interesting. I recently have been shooting almost entirely constant light and I incorporate a lot of video as well.

What do you usually shoot?

Lighitng wise? Up until January of this year, I shot all strobe, mainly with 2 ad600 pros and used large umbrellas and stripboxes mainly. This year, I moved studios and built fancy sets with two large fake windows. One is 15' tall x 7' wide. The other is 10'x10' and has cool window lights opposite a warm chandelier. And almost all of my shoots this year have been with those window lights only. I recently got two LED monolights - 60-watt Godox light and a 100-watt Godox light. I have a lantern modifier and I use the LED lights on a tall rolling stand with the lantern modifier about 10' up as fill light against the window lights.
For genres, 99% of my work is boudoir. Ever since I got this ultra pretty studio, it's just been a bunch of boudoir inquiries and I changed my marketing to focus just on that so that I could not look like a generalist. I still occasionally shoot fashion and editorial stuff for my own personal projects.

So to clarify, everything strobe wise is too expensive apart for Godox because you don't even use strobes. Okay!... This thing keeps getting interesting for sure.

No, I think everything I have said, you have unclarfied it in your mind. So let me clarify for real. 1. I never said that all of the other strobes are too expensive. In fact, that is not even a point I ever raise in this article. The question in this article is whether Godox lights can be used in professional applications and I look at some of the reasons people have said to choose one brand over another. My conclusion is that if these lights are suitable for you, you should use them, but if you need to spend money for the features of the other brands’ lights, you should get those. That’s clear, right? 2. Your other issue above in the comments is that someone has to buy a light in order to determine that it is too expensive, otherwise, it is the same as someone making a review about a product they never owned and speculating that it probably won’t work. I disagreed with you, and you still believe that someone making up reasons that a product they never owned wouldn’t work is just as bad as someone saying that a certain product is too expensive. I see them as different. You see them as the same. That’s fine, I can live with us never being able to convince each other. 3. I have shot hundreds of thousands of shots with strobes. Regardless, this is not an article or a discussion about what is too expensive for me personally. If you would like to have a discussion on whether I know and understand lighting, that is something else entirely and I will gladly have that discussion with you. There is no argument anywhere that people should buy lights based on my workflow. In fact, I say that people need to buy lights based on their own workflows using the considerations in this article. For example, I see you like to take pictures of cats. I would recommend maybe a speedlight or natural light. Whatever helps your workflow and is suitable to your needs. So, I’m really hoping that this is all clear to you.

The article is one thing, you jumping on my reply to Francisco is another one. You can't have it both way. "Too expensive, too expensive.."
You made up your number 2 point (twice now) it's actually a total nonsense comment and conclusion definitely not my words, clearly yours in your comment.
This and another article I commented on Monday, to me is like total deja Vu from the Paul Buff crazy debates always massively backed up by his followers. He got kicked (on his own) from forums too. That was entertaining. May be John Gress remembers? If yes he has to be smiling right now

I understand about 28% of what you are saying here.

Your average it seems.

*You're

Godox all the way!!!

Buying more than is necessary isn't smart.

Buying less than is needed isn't smart.

Different photographers have different needs. Some need fast recycle times at high power; others only need fast recycle at lower power, and some don't need fast recycle at all. Some need lightweight even at elevated costs (carbon fiber vs aluminum); others don't care. Some need to fire thousands of times an hour for weeks on end; others...don't. Etc.

Determine the actual needs first. Doing otherwise is folly.

Picking ONE factor to determine an entire brand--or category--of lighting's suitability for use for all photographers (even all 'professional' photographers) is worthy of ridicule. A product photographer has different lighting needs than a dance photographer who has different needs than an environmental portraitist who has different needs than a fashion photographer who has different needs than an architectural photographer (etc). Even in today's highly competitive market, very few professionals and even fewer amateurs try to photograph everything--and therefore will NOT have the same requirements.

The question is..what problem are you trying to solve? Does the solution bring another problem

Brand is irrelevant.

Certain Godox flashes, are well known for a colour cast on some settings. If you are a real estate photographer, for example, that translates to a lot of unnecessary post production.

If you shoot products day in day out, you want consistent very colour rendition and flash power

If you shoot anything fast moving that you want to freeze, and you need consistent colour and power accuracy your requirements are totally different to the wedding photographer who needs a fill light or just wants to overpower the sun

Then there is practically. Your needs are different to the next guys. Does your gear need to be light, portable and easy to use solo... That's different to the photographer with a crew of assistants, etc.

Then there is cost. A real pro knows that gear needs to earn it's keep. Expensive gear sometimes is just not economically viable for some professional photographer, the ROI doesn't stack up. There is a flip side cheap gear can prove just as costly in the long run.

Back to the real estate photographers.. they have all figured which Godox products to avoid. They love the Ad200's. The shape of the modifier and power hits a sweet spot, at a great price. A price where you can keep a few spares in the van!

A real professional knows what they need and don't need

Th

Exactly. Use your judgment based on what you do and your needs. And just because one person can make $15,000 a month with four Profoto lights, it doesn't mean that a hundred other people aren't making $15,000 a month with two AD200s. People need to focus more on what they need themselves in lights and less on whether people doing something different with different requirements are using the same lights you need.

The discussion about what is good or not is something that has been going on for a long time. Personally, I no longer listen to the debaters and other "influencers". They only spreading disinformation.

Two months ago, I shot an outdoor wedding. Due to COVID-19, the group of people was small. Godox was so kind and sent me an AD100Pro for free. I have previously purchased other Godox flashes. I worked non-stop for eight hours without any problems. There was no restriction on what I can do with Godox flashes.

Fujifilm X-H1 has also received criticism from "influencers" so I made the decision to get this camera as well.

The perfect symbiosis: X-H1 and Godox. With a little creativity, can reasonably priced gears offer results that is good as the expensive systems.

My guy. You want to know what’s even more unprofessional than using Godox lights? Having to bottom feed on click-bait driven ad revenue on YouTube because you didn’t cut it as professional photographer. This was just a poorly sourced / speculative opinion piece from another no name snake oil sales man on YouTube.

We replaced our AlienBees/Einstein lights with Godox AD600BM when Godox first launched them and they've been great. We've since added one of the Pro lights and several Godox flashes. I think that's the biggest advantage; a single wireless system that works with any camera and allows you to mix-and-match small flashes, big flashes, wired strobes, battery-operated strobes, etc. TTL, HSS, etc., it all just works. There's a good variety of different triggers (we use the FusionTLC Raven now).

We've had a couple of failures over many years and there is NO support. You keep an extra on hand and throw them out if they fail. It's not ideal but I haven't found anything I like better (and we've had loaners to test Profoto, Westcott, Elinchrom, etc). And they're cheap enough that it's a viable strategy.

Pray you never need to update the firmware because Godox software is a nightmare.

Thanks Tony. I bought your book when I first stated learning photography. I do love the variety of the Godox flashes. Firmware is kind of a pain. I think it only works on a PC or something, right? I've only done it a handful of times.

That's a shame. I know you are going to hate me for this, but one higher end brand actually did a software change after I suggested it. The only thing was that I had to wait a couple months before it was integrated to the next firmware but at least it was totally free.

.

I though you were Cheap Jeff so I'm rewording. Yes some do apparently. The brand I use, yes, I'll get replies from the main office in Europe or the distributor here depending on my question and who I send it to. They have always done it. I may sound on some post like I am aggressive sometimes, but there is a lot of s to debunk from Youtube "specialists", it's a pity, I just drive through their pile brakes off.

What is a shame? Why would you making a software suggestion to a camera manufacturer and them implementing it be the thing I hate you for?

lol

I keep an old windows laptop kicking around just for Godox and Sony firmware updates. It works like a charm on Windows 7 with all the security turned off. Absolutely silly that both manufacturers can't figure out a better way of getting that job done. It's literally the only thing that computer is used for.

Can't think of any other strobe that has the versatility of AD200. You can change bulb, fresnel, round heads. you can add head extension. you can add profoto adapter which I use with OCF and even Softlighter. you can double the power with 2 bulb extension. I wish the AD300 has the same form factor as AD200 so you could use the same accessories. With Profoto adapter the bulb is not recessed into the reflector. Also it's great Godox use compatible batteries on 200 and 300.

I've used godox for years for professional work and I never had an issue I even bought there LED lights for video and can't complain.

Having watched several videos and spoken to and read several arguments for and against Godox, let me summarize the argument with an analogy. Every camera brand has a $200 nifty fifty that is usually a 50 1.8. You can get a lot done with it. Sometimes though, your work demands that you get a $2,000 50 1.2, which is better, finds focus easier, sharper, nicer in a lot of ways. You can still make money with a nifty fifty, but sometimes pros need something more. Sometimes, some pros can get by with the nifty fifty and make a great living. That doesn't mean the nifty fifty is bad. It doesn't mean that the 50 1.2 is overhyped. It's just simple plain facts. So, sometimes you need an expensive light with better cooling, better color consistency, better customer service, or whatever. One group needs them, one group doesn't.

I don't think "disposable" is particularly a problem. Once upon a time I looked at electronic flash equipment as a once-in-career expense, so longevity was of supreme importance.

These days, with electronic developments come so rapidly, I think an upgrade every three or four years would be beneficial...and if I'm gong to do that, "disposable" becomes a positive, not a negative.

I'm not sure I'd entirely agree with John's positioning of Elinchrom as a staple of the professional market. Sure their high end equipment is still good but I've owned D-Lite heads and found them to be cheaply made and with any large modifier would sag badly as the clamps are plastic. Contrast that to, say, Alien Bees and a pair of AB600 heads I bought over a decade ago are still going strong by the photographer I sold them to (using large softboxes).

I think you've made good points on the Profoto v Godox debate. It really does come down to what you need from your system and generally there isn't really a right or wrong answer. I used Profoto for years but as they discontinued the packs I used maintenance became a real issue - which is when I started selling some of it off and replacing it with Godox. One big advantage that system has is a series of lights that can be run off mains or battery power so, for me, that's a huge plus. The colour accuracy mode on the Pro lights is really good as well. Is the Bowens mount as good as the Profoto mount (at least on the AD600 Pro)? No, not at all. And I really wish the modelling lights were better. But then I still have a few Profoto packs left so I can incorporate those as and when they're needed.

But to say that Godox lights aren't professional is pretty ridiculous. I'm not saying they're better than Profoto but equally I've used Godox lights professionally for a number of years now with no issues at all with performance. And the customer service is in place now (at least in the UK) so repairs and spares are not an issue.

Always enjoy these "is it good enough" articles.To be honest most photographers are not using their equipment (cameras, lenses, lights, grip equipment) at the edges of it's capabilities.
Computers are different, we often outrun what the old computer can work with after buying a new camera.

The reason I bought Normans 30+ years ago is because that was the only brand available in Detroit. I still use them once in a while along with Hensel and Godox.
I never got on the Profoto train, nice stuff to be sure.

I bought a couple of godox heads to teach and mentor on. Certainly cheaper by nearly half compared to my profoto gear but I'll definitely tell you that the stuff worked fantastically this weekend. The glow brand of light modifiers is not very high quality but then again I didn't expect them to be so I just bought a speed ring adapter to use my profoto modifiers. It certainly gave me pause to think about the gear. Just remember somewhere somebody is using gear you would consider junk and making a lot more money than you.

Both my Profoto A1's went south within two weeks recently, with one unit the on/off button stopped latching and with the other the zoom motor started disturbing wedding guests (and me). So I got 2 Godox V1C and the Xpro controller for less than the cost of one Profoto A1X. I already prefer the Godox. I can even turn the flash off and back on again and start shooting, whereas with the A1's I would have to turn the camera off and back on before it would trigger the flash. And all the Profoto domes etc fit the V1. On weddings nobody gives a rat's behind what you are using, if it bothers you that much get some black tape.

More comments