Fstoppers Reviews the Canon EOS R5 From a Photographer's Perspective

Fstoppers Reviews the Canon EOS R5 From a Photographer's Perspective

If you have missed the launch of the Canon EOS R5 mirrorless full frame camera, you have lived under a rock for at least a year. Or perhaps you aren't interested in new cameras. The Canon EOS R5 is the most advanced Canon mirrorless camera on the market. Canon Netherlands gave me one for a week to make an extensive review.

Meet the Canon EOS R5, the flagship of modern mirrorless cameras with the latest techniques and options available on the market. It is the successor of the Canon EOS R and EOS RP, which are the first full frame mirrorless cameras Canon released. The Canon EOS R5 can't be compared, though. It is a professional model with the features most professionals would like to have.

The first feature that comes to mind is the double card slot, which was missing in the first two full frame mirrorless Canon cameras. The sophisticated autofocus system and the in-body image stabilization system are a welcome feature also, of course, although the latter might not be the most important feature for some photographers.

Shooting landscapes with the Canon EOS R5 is a lot of fun.

Shooting landscapes with the Canon EOS R5 is a lot of fun.

Filming With the Canon EOS R5

There has been much discussion about filming with the Canon EOS R5. It has the ability to film with an 8K resolution and 30 frames per second. The amount of data generated is so much it leads to serious heat build-up. The latest firmware update changes the way how the camera deals with the temperature control and thus improved the experience greatly.

I don’t want to go into depth about filming with the Canon EOS R5. There wasn’t enough time in one week to dive into it, and I wanted to see how the camera performed from a photographer's point of view. The only thing I would like to mention is the change in the film menu Canon made. It is much improved compared to the menu I have seen in the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III.

The film menu of the Canon EOS R5 is much improved.

The film menu of the Canon EOS R5 is much improved.

The Looks

The design of the Canon EOS R5 is very similar to the Canon EOS R model. But there are a lot of differences also. The infamous touch bar of the Canon EOS R has been replaced with the more traditional Canon button layout, joystick, and rotation wheel. The four buttons on the left side are gone because of the articulating LCD screen. Some of these buttons have a different, perhaps better location. The buttons on the top side are gone also. These functions, like white balance, autofocus, and ISO settings can be changed when pressing the M-Fn button.

An overview of the button layout

An overview of the button layout.

The Canon EOS R5 has a nice but small square screen that shows the camera settings. The information is divided into two different pages. You can change the page by pressing the light button. Holding down the button for a second will change the screen from black to white.

The PSAM wheel is missing. You can change the PSAM settings by pressing the mode button. This is a big difference compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. I prefer the PSAM wheel over the mode button, but this is a matter of getting used to it. The on-off switch is quite prominent, which turned out to be very handy after using the camera for some time. It is very easy to use it, which can help to extend battery life.

The layout is much like the Canon EOS 5D mark IV. There is no touch-bar anymore, which is a good thing

The layout is much like the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. There is no touch bar anymore, which is a good thing .

The Canon EOS R5 has three rotation wheels that can be programmed to your needs. I like to use it for changing the aperture, shutter speed, and ISO level. It offers a very quick way to change settings. With the control ring on the lenses, there is a fourth wheel available. All wheels and buttons are well placed and have a nice feel. I had no difficulties finding the buttons on touch. The less important buttons are recessed, which makes it easier to distinguish these buttons without having to look at it while photographing.

The Menu and Customization Possibilities

I have seen and worked with almost every camera brand on the market, and I think the menu structure of Canon EOS cameras is one of the best there is. The Canon EOS R5 has the same menu structure with the special mirrorless options added. As mentioned before, Canon has improved the film menu, making it more logical and easier to understand.

There are a lot of customization possibilities.

There are a lot of customization possibilities.

Extra options among others are the possibility to customize the electronic viewfinder information, the type of shutter, and focus peaking. The menu also offers a great level of customization. Nearly every button and wheel can be changed to your own needs. The flexible My Menu gives the ability to gather most used menu functions for easy and quick access, divided over multiple tabs if needed.

Some of the menu functions

Some of the menu functions.

It is possible to operate the camera completely through the touchscreen. It is also possible to change the focus point while peering through the electronic viewfinder, just by swiping over the screen. It is a much easier way compared to the joystick. The latter can be used also for changing the focus point. Canon now offers the possibility to change the sensitivity of the joystick, making it much more efficient to use compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

Unfortunately, there is no optical sensor in the AF-ON button like the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III has. I really love that smart controller, and I wish Canon had incorporated this small gem. Using the touchscreen to change the focus point works very well also, but you need to take your thumb off the AF-ON button. (read my review about the Canon EOS 1D X Mark III)

The Canon EOS R5 Versus the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

I have used the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV for many years. I truly love the design of that camera, the way it handles, and the results it produces. It has been the favorite camera for my photography, even after I had the opportunity to test and review a lot of other cameras from Sony, Olympus, Nikon, Fujifilm, Leica, Hasselblad, and Panasonic.

The Canon EOS R5 feels like the mirrorless version of the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, with a lot of improvements that have become possible because of the mirrorless system. Fortunately, Canon has kept the ergonomics, which resulted in a smaller camera body, but not too small. It is only a little bit smaller and lighter, and I love it.

The Canon EOS R5 in front of the Canon 5D mark IV, two amazing cameras

The Canon EOS R5 in front of the Canon 5D Mark IV, two amazing cameras.

At first, the built quality of the Canon EOS R5 appears less robust compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. But appearances are deceptive. I have used the Canon EOS R5 intensively next to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV during two weddings, and I didn’t felt the need to be more careful with the camera at all.

The back side of the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS 5D mark IV

The back side of the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

The top side of the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS 5D mark IV

The top side of the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

The Canon EOS R5 and the BGR-10 Battery Grip

Canon gave me the battery grip BGR-10 also. It gives the possibility to use two batteries and offers a second set of buttons and wheels for shooting in a vertical position. The size of the battery grip makes the camera bulkier and much heavier. This is inevitable, of course.

The BGR-10 grip is a bit longer compared to the camera body, something you don’t notice until you look at it. It handles well when using it in a vertical position. Although it eliminates the benefit of a smaller and lighter camera body, it might improve handling when using large and heavy tele lenses. I decided to use the camera without a grip.

The battery grip makes the camera much bigger.

The battery grip makes the camera much bigger.

Autofocus Performance

The Canon EOS R5 makes use of Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus, divided over 100% in the horizontal direction and 90% in the vertical direction. It has 5,940 autofocus points, and there is an amazing eye autofocus option, face autofocus, and body autofocus. The eye autofocus works with humans and animals, and you can set priority or let the camera choose. The touchscreen enables you to change the autofocus point to another person if needed.

Eye AF works amazingly well. With the touch screen it is easy to change the position of the eye AF point

Eye AF works amazingly well. With the touchscreen, it is easy to change the position of the eye AF point.

I haven’t tested the autofocus and the tracking ability to a great extent, but I have tried to get an impression of what it is capable of. By photographing our dog with an 85mm lens at f/1.4 for a very shallow depth of field, I became very impressed by its performance. The animal eye autofocus managed to keep the focus on the eye while the dog was running towards me. If the dog's hair obscured the eye and the focus was lost, it managed to find the eye within a second.  

The focus tracking and eye AF makes it possible to keep focus onto the eye of this running dog. I used a 85mm lens and aperture f/1.4 which makes it very difficult because of the shallow depth of field.

The focus tracking and eye AF made it possible to keep focus on the eye of this running dog. I used a 85mm lens and aperture f/1.4, which made it very difficult because of the shallow depth of field.

The menu offers the same autofocus customization as previous EOS models, with the extra settings like touch and drag AF and eye detection. The M-Fn button enables a sub-menu where you can change autofocus settings very quickly, and the responsiveness of the joystick for changing the autofocus point can be customized. It reacts much quicker compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

Real-World Use

One week with a brand new camera is not long enough, but I got a good impression of how it performs for landscape photography and wedding photography. The operation of the camera is a bit different from the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV but very familiar at the same time. The articulating screen in combination with the touchscreen is very convenient for photographing in awkward positions or from a tripod. The focus peaking makes manual focus very easy to use.

Manual focus and focus peaking. Focus assist is also enabled.

Manual focus and focus peaking. Focus assist is also enabled.

The in-body image stabilization works up to eight stops, which makes it easy to shoot without a tripod. The system doesn’t work for moving objects, of course. If the shutter speed is too slow, you might be able to shoot handheld, but the moving objects will cause motion blur nevertheless. Still, it is perfect for longer focal lengths.

During my weddings, the eye autofocus worked perfectly. It is reliable and fast. The touch and drag option makes it very easy to change the autofocus point from one face to another. I noticed how easy it becomes to rely on this system, especially when I switched from the Canon EOS R5 to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV again.

How About the Battery?

The Canon EOS R5 uses a new type of battery with a larger capacity. It is backwards compatible with the older type of batteries, which is a good thing. If you have a bunch of spare ones, you can keep on using them, although the capacity is a bit lower.

The amount of shots you can take on a single charge depends on the way you are using the camera. For my landscape photography, I got approximately 200 to 300 shots, because I use the LCD screen for a longer period of time per photo. But I got over 1,000 shots on one battery charge during the weddings.

The bottom line is the battery capacity is not as great as some of its competitors, but it isn’t bad either. Just make sure you get a few spare ones in your bag. If you want extra battery capacity, it is also possible to use the battery grip.

My Conclusion After One Week With the Canon EOS R5

I have heard a lot of stories and rumors about the Canon EOS R5 on the internet, about how amazing this camera is. Often, these stories are exaggerated, but in this case, I think it is the truth. I don’t care about the 8K resolution or the 4K film capabilities. I am a photographer, and I found out this camera is one of the best Canon cameras I have ever used.

I am very impressed by the autofocus capabilities, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the system is as good as the Sony eye autofocus, for which it is famous. Some say it even works better compared to Sony, but I can’t confirm this without a real comparison. Nevertheless, I do find it very reliable and found out I got many more perfectly sharp shots during my weddings compared to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

The camera isn’t perfect, though. I still prefer a real PSAM selection wheel on top of the camera, and there is no quick way to activate bracketing. The optical sensor in the AF-ON button would have been nice to have, making the camera even more intuitive to use. Last, but not least, longer battery life would be great. I do believe most of these findings are very personal.

Shooting with the Canon EOS R5 is fun (photo by Hetwie)

Shooting with the Canon EOS R5 is fun (photo by Hetwie).

The conclusion I have after one week with the Canon EOS R5 is very clear. I want to have one, and I can recommend it for every wedding and landscape photographer. Too bad I had to send the camera back to Canon Netherlands.

Things I Like A Lot

  • Size and dimensions
  • Perfectly formed grip with enough space between grip and lens
  • Amazing eye AF, face AF, and body AF
  • 5,940 autofocus points, with 1,053 Dual Pixel CMOS AF areas, 100% horizontal and 90% vertical
  • Accurate focus tracking with 20 frames per second in electronic shutter mode (12 fps mechanical shutter)
  • Buffer for 87 raw files with SD card and 180 raw files with the CF Express.
  • 45 mp resolution
  • Double card slot (CF-Express (type B)  and USH-II SD)
  • In-body image stabilization up to eight stops
  • Fully functional touchscreen with touch and drag AF
  • Electronic OLED viewfinder with over 5 million pixels and up to 120 frames per second refresh rate
  • The camera is completely silent with the electronic shutter
  • Almost fully customizable
  • Focus bracketing
  • Bulb timer
  • Time-lapse function
  • C-raw file format
  • ISO performance is increased over one stop compared to Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Things That Could Be Improved

  • No dedicated PSAM wheel
  • No optical sensor in the AF-ON button like the Canon EOS 1D X mark III
  • No dedicated button for AE bracketing shots
  • Manual focus assist doesn’t show depth of field
  • Battery capacity could be better (although it isn’t horrible either)
  • Shutter speed can’t be dialed beyond 30 seconds (you need bulb for longer exposures)

Gallery

Although Canon provided me with this camera, I have no financial benefit or other relation to Canon. This review is my own opinion. I also would like to read about your opinion about this camera in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments

58 Comments

David Pavlich's picture

Very nice review. When it comes to camera usage, I'm much like the author; I don't give two shakes about the video side of things. It was nice to read a review that said little about the video side instead, focusing (sorry) on the photo side.

Daniel Lee's picture

A lot more reviews have finally started to focus on stills only which is great to see.

R S's picture

Unfortunately YouTube reviews are obsessed with video and vlogging - finding a decent photography review for many new cameras is hard work, with 90% of them banging on about SLog, Luts, 4:2:2 and other things I don't understand.

Sridhar Chilimuri's picture

I like your review. It is balanced and gives us a good insight into its abilities as a still camera. I just have one quibble about build quality. "I have used the Canon EOS R5 intensively next to the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV during two weddings, and I didn’t felt the need to be more careful with the camera at all". I am not sure you would have used it "intensively" when it is just lent to you for one week.

Nando Harmsen's picture

Sure it is. I have used it every day for hours.

Jay Jay's picture

Very little mention of one of the most infamous faults of the camera, i.e. the overheating issue? I've read even stills shooting is affected by overheating. And that's a vastly serious deal. You've had the camera for a week and weren't able to explore this? I know the article is nicely written and glowing towards the R5, but i'm a little thrown off that the one issue that has plagued this camera since it came out wasn't addressed.

sam dasso's picture

Perhaps camera did not overheat during his review. How he suppose to address it? I don't trust anything that some youtuber puts up to generate likes and views. If you have first hand experience with stills overheating - tell us about it and if you don't, then whatever you read or watched on internet is irrelevant..

Nando Harmsen's picture

I have used the camera for hours and hours at a row and there is no overheating whatsoever. I believe the heating problem is just when using video, and mostly with the older firmware.
If you are using it for stills, there is no problem at all. Otherwise I would have mentioned it.

Rayann Elzein's picture

Read the title of the article. For once it's quite clear on this website with no click-bait attempt: R5 for PHOTOGRAPHERS !! Nobody ever said it overheats in photography mode, and Nando was quite clear he wasn't testing the video functions.

Alex Herbert's picture

I have not seen a single review where the reviewer has claimed the camera 'overheated' in stills mode. In fact if you've been following the saga (and it sounds like you have been) you should know the 'overheating' is a timer which is built into some of the video modes.

Dorin Calugarean's picture

Considering that 99% of the reviews on the internet are about overheating, I don't know what else would you expect / like to find out?
Feel free to Google search and find out everything you need to know.

As for overheating while taking stills, I have recently took a trip to the local zoo and took over 2k photos and there was no overheating.

For once is refreshing to see someone touching only the stills without wasting time on the video side.

Alan Myers's picture

R5 overheating during video has been discussed six ways from Sunday on every imaginable blog and Internet platform. Thank you for only giving it passing mention here and for "focusing" on the usefulness of the camera for still photography, which is a bigger concern for some of us.

jim blair's picture

It's a boring review like all the rest, just an empty conclusion that has been repeated now for awhile. No real depth about the image quality, changes in post processing, trusting eye AF vs traditional focus points, or composition techniques made easier or improved for example. The photos look great, but I'm sure your 5d4 could have produced the same thing.

Nando Harmsen's picture

You are right. I could have taken these with my 5D4 also. You cannot see any difference, except the files have more pixels. Isn't that great? You can continu shooting with the R5 as if you are using the 5D4, with every single benefit from eye focus and more.
I only had the oportunity to use it for a week. That is not enough time for all those pixel peeping things you mention.
But I cn add, I started to trust the eye focus after some hours during the first wedding, and started to rely on it. Something I never dared when using other cameras with eye focus. Post processing is not different from any other Canon, unless your computer has trouble with larger file sizes. About composition; a new camera doesn't make compositions easier, but I do think the 5940 AF points make it easier to place focus point somewhere in the screen, without the need for measuring AF before making a composition. But the eye-AF does the job for you.

David Love's picture

"I don’t want to go into depth about filming with the Canon EOS R5. There wasn’t enough time in one week to dive into it." Damn is the cool down wait that long? Sorry I had to.

Nando Harmsen's picture

Hahaha
I have to remember this one. You gave a smile on my face.

Pedro Pulido's picture

4 people didn't recognize humour and sarcasm. well done sir! hehe

David Love's picture

4 people bought the R5 before realizing the video was crippled and there merely to stand out from other companies on a spec sheet. It backfired and is now chasing more video centric people to Sony. Which most likely once someone is filming all their vids with Sony will figure, why not just shoot all their pics on Sony too. I don't like being treated like I am stupid by them.

Pedro Pulido's picture

well if 4 people have made that mistake they should have waited for reviews before rushing in! I'd buy this camera now after all the reviews, cause i don't care about video at all. Pretty sure it's an awesome stills camera. As for video, i couldn't care less to be honest. and if people bought it believing the marketing well... they should know better. GAS often leads to regrets.

David Love's picture

I have two BMPCC 6K cameras for video. Without the big promotion of 8k internal blah blah blah, basically all they could've said is "Hey we finally have that Sony stuff added." As a mostly studio photographer, none of the stuff in the R5 really improves my work. I'll stick with the mark 4 until it dies. Then I still have the mark 3 that takes great pics. 3800.00 buys some better lighting, other lens, etc.

Tamas Nemeth's picture

I had a chance to borrow an R5 last weekend - so I can start used to it while my order arrives, and I was shooting mainly wildlife with it. Other than two nuances I love this camera and cannot wait until my copy arrives.
Regarding to the build quality - I have realized over the last few years that I enjoy using big solid cameras. I’d pick a 1D body vs 5D for wildlife, or a Phase One vs a Fujifilm GFX for landscape any day of the week. But I guess it is very unlikely to have a high res sensor in a future R1 body.
About the EVF. I was shooting evf-only to save battery. I also set a very short time to turn it off for the same reason. So my little annoyance was that the EVF took a second or so to turn on after I peaked in, which was distracting when some action was happening.

Rayann Elzein's picture

I don't understand the thumb down that you got. The EVF comment is very useful in my opinion, and would be quite a problem for me with wildlife. How often are you waiting in a hide for something to happen, and you'll miss it while waiting for the EVF to turn on!

Dorin Calugarean's picture

Same for me, I prefer a big solid camera over the small bodies. Plus, I have big hands, so while 5d mark iv was very confortabile to use, with the R5 I had bit of trouble trying to comfortably use my thumb for back focus.

I have added the grip and not looking back. Also this way creates a bit of balance when using the 70-200 or 100-400.

But that's just me.

Greg Wilson's picture

Thanks for the evf info! That’s quite useful to know. I love the “always ready” experience that I have with my 5D cameras, and the fact DSLRs do not consume the battery while being on and ready. So I was quite curious to find out how the R5 behaves in this department.

Nando Harmsen's picture

If you want a camera that is build as brick you need EOS 1Dx mark III. But besides that, I think the R5 does a really good job.
I read somewhere how the EVF used more battery power compaared to the LCD. If it is true, I don't know, and I cannot remember where I read this comment. It might be something to look at.

David Love's picture

Who are the people that complained about needing a camera that can hang from a keychain. What person is all of photography catering too after all these years of big cameras. I thought that was what point and clicks were for. Staring at an lcd and counting on all the auto af settings to do the job doesn't feel intimate for me as a photographer. I might as well just deliver the camera to their house and then use a remote over webcam. When is the auto shutter when the camera thinks it's a good shot feature coming.

You set the camera on a tripod and walk away and it will auto take and upload all pics it chooses to take to instagram with instagram filter added. Then everyone can do it and everyone of us can get that grocer job we've been dying to have.

Rayann Elzein's picture

Only thing I want now, is the same "Movie rec. size" page of the menu on the 1DX3. Can't be that hard to implement with a firmware update. It's quite horrendous to switch resolutions and fps without choosing the wrong one.

Nando Harmsen's picture

It is much much much better compared to the EOS 1DxIII. But a firmware update could change that. I wonder if Canon will do that

Robert Weber's picture

Do you have an opinion regarding the image quality of the R5 compared to the 5DSR. I love the images from my 5DSR and I am trying to decide if I want to switch. I use this camera for landscapes. I also own an EOS R and use its eye focus for portraits where 30 MP is sufficient.

More comments