Please Don't Tell Me You're Doing This With All Your Photos

Please Don't Tell Me You're Doing This With All Your Photos

Can you imagine buying a gorgeous new Ferrari, then storing it in the darkness of your garage forever? Sounds pretty crazy, right? But you could be doing almost the exact equivalent when it comes to your photography.

I'm sure you've seen shows like American Idol, or X Factor, or Britain's Got Talent, and so forth. Most of these franchises have been sold worldwide, and they are now global phenomena. The premise is pretty simple in most of them: discover talented, new people, and give them a platform to shine. Indeed, some of the winners and other finalists have gone on to become household names and superstars in their own right. However, the one thing every contestant on these shows has in common, whether they win or lose, is that they want to be seen, and heard, and discovered. They believe in their talents and they want others to see them too.

And that’s why it always shocks me when I see so many photographers that I know or have befriended online who don’t show their work anywhere. Or if they do, it’s usually restricted to online platforms such as Facebook or Instagram. Some of these photographers are absolutely incredible talents whose work could rival that of any pro out there making a living from their images, yet they barely display their photos anywhere. Not for the greater public to see, nor for their own friends and family to see.

All of these people pretty much fit an identical description. They have invested thousands of dollars into building an extensive photography kit full of bodies and different lenses. They have mastered their craft and regularly go out and take exquisitely well-crafted images. They understand the intricacies of post-production very well and are masters at turning their raw image files into final works of art. They then save their images to a hard drive, in carefully labeled folders, and then perhaps, now and then, upload them to some social media channels, where they go through the quick cycle of peoples' news feeds and then disappear into the digital abyss. And there it ends. It genuinely baffles me to see such wasted talent.

The Problems With Facebook and Instagram

If you’re uploading to social media sites such as Facebook and Instagram, it’s better than nothing, I guess. But there are some fundamental problems with using these sites. The first is the quality of the image that your friends or followers see. The algorithm that Facebook uses is well known as an image killer. The way it compresses photos often takes wonderfully clean, crisp images and turns them into ugly, blurry junk that resembles nothing of the original image that you uploaded. Instagram is a little bit better with maintaining image quality, but the problem with Instagram is that it’s a mobile phone platform. Therefore, it works much better for portraits, or to be more exact, images uploaded with a 5×4 ratio. So, if you’re uploading landscape images, or God forbid, panoramas, they look absolutely crap, because you’re not using the real estate of a mobile phone because of the way most people hold them.

Then there is the issue with your friends and followers actually seeing your images. Since Facebook and Instagram both became pay to play and littered with sponsored posts, they have both drastically reduced the number of friends and followers who actually see your images. These days, I’m genuinely lucky if Instagram shows any of my images to more than 10% of my followers. The other day, I uploaded an image, and Instagram did me the dazzlingly kind favor of notifying me that my post had reached 95% more of my followers than previous posts. And that post had only reached barely 10%! Thus, because Instagram wants you to pay to reach your followers, very often, the images that you upload aren’t even seen by 90% of the people who have elected to follow you. Isn’t that just wonderful? So, if you’re only uploading to sites such as Facebook and Instagram, you can’t even be sure that 80 to 90% of the people that you’re trying to show your work to are even seeing it, let alone appreciating it.

I understand that we can’t all make a living from photography. My main job is working in a university in Japan. And we don’t all have time to march the streets and try to get our works in galleries, or cafes, or bars, or restaurants. Some of us may have completely given up on the dream of ever selling our work for a living or even for a bit of pocket money. But to store all of your incredibly wonderful photos in the deep, dark depths of a digital hard drive? Or leave it to the whims of ever-changing algorithms of online sites? I really don’t understand that. So, what’s the solution?

Printing my work has given me a new lease of life as far as my photography is concerned. I genuinely derive incredible amounts of pleasure when I feel a new print in my fingers. It doesn’t matter if it’s a paper print on a simple 5 x 7 sheet, or a larger fine art print on specialty paper, or a canvas that I’ve ordered elsewhere. Holding it in my hands and carefully looking at the rich colors before my eyes gives me a real sense of accomplishment and achievement. It’s a physical manifestation of the hours and months and years that I’ve poured into my photography. And better than that is I know I’m going to put those prints up on my walls where my family and I can walk past them and see them every day.

It might sound slightly narcissistic, but I honestly stop and look at my photos every single day. Not because I think they’re anything particularly revolutionary or groundbreaking, but more that they are a reflection of my love for photography and a daily reminder of the times that I have spent out in nature or with my kids. This wall above at my house is reserved exclusively for family shots. It's in the living room, so I see this wall the most, especially when I'm taking my kids to bed or waking up with them in the morning. I can stare at these images for hours and reminisce.

This canvas image is by the doorway at home, so I see it every time I come and go.

I also have photos of local places here in Japan where I live, such as the one above and photos of places I've traveled, such as those below of Greece, where I went on my honeymoon. The memories and positive thoughts that these give me every day cannot be understated. And I wonder how often any of my friends can feel anything like the satisfaction I get by storing their images in folders on a hard drive or intermittently uploading them to social media networks. I can earnestly say that if not for these images of Greece here (and in other rooms), I would never see them, because I have so many hard drives that I wouldn't even know where they're all stored off the top of my head.

A four-in-one canvas from my honeymoon to Santorini and Mykonos

Narcissism aside, there are also some other advantages of printing your work. Firstly, it can lead to job opportunities. I've had numerous job offers as a direct result of people seeing my prints. I would say that a good 80% of those jobs have been from people coming to my house and seeing the prints all over the walls. That has led to conversations about my photography, about the photos that we were looking at, and types of work I can do. Without those prints up on the wall, those conversations would never have happened, and those paid jobs would never have transpired.

Secondly, if your printer is good enough, it can lead to print work. Word has got around my small little neighborhood that I have a pretty decent printer, and I now get a regular number of requests to print images for people. What you charge is entirely up to you. Sometimes I charge, sometimes I don't, depending on who it is. However, if I don't charge, I almost always receive something; this is Japan, after all! I invested in an Epson SureColor P800, but you don't need to go that big. I did because I was consistently unhappy with the results I was getting. The requests for prints is an added bonus I hadn't counted on.

My trusty Epson

Finally, printing images has led to a lot of new friendships. I've taken some incredible images this year of surfers riding massive waves at some famous places near home. After talking to the surfers in the images and giving them access to my sequences and stills, I've also had some requests for A4 and A3 (and larger) prints. This has led to beers on my deck and introductions to some other notable big wave riders in town who I would never have met had it not been for my photography and my prints. I'm forever grateful for the opportunities that have come my way in the last few months.

Summing Up

In closing, I really do want to reiterate that printing your work offers up an incredible sense of satisfaction. It reminds you of your passions and your hard work and can lead to lots of different opportunities you might not have had otherwise. So, if you're storing all your work on your computer or digitally, please think about getting some hard copies of your work to hang at home or in your office. I guarantee you won't regret it.

Do you print your work? I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below.

Iain Stanley's picture

Iain Stanley is an Associate Professor teaching photography and composition in Japan. Fstoppers is where he writes about photography, but he's also a 5x Top Writer on Medium, where he writes about his expat (mis)adventures in Japan and other things not related to photography. To view his writing, click the link above.

Log in or register to post comments
85 Comments
Previous comments

Right on! I'm on the cusp of exploring craft fairs... your experience is a motivator. Thank you.

Interesting idea. I'm definitely not a professional and have substantial insecurity about my image quality. I don't need to book clients or do portraits, but selling some prints at a table at a charity craft fair would be some real validation.

Excellent. I’m happy to hear about the success you’ve with your prints. Keep up the good work

Hi, did you try to get in touch via my website? It's a new work in progress and I forgot to add the message field!

I’ve sent this post to our editors and site administrators. It’s above my station, I’m sorry.

Even excellent photographers do not think to use a polarizing filter for indoor work.

Also, Costco in the USA will print you a fine calendar for $20. Not too late for the holidays -- especially good if you have images from all seasons of a favorite place.

https://www.costcophotocenter.com/calendars

Ha! Good point, though I actually took all these shots quickly with my iphone. I’m not sure about Costco but I know that the print quality in some equivalent stores in Australia is horrible. Good deal if Costco’s prints are nice quality, though.

Locally Costco does a good job and inexpensive. Might vary per location and the maintenance of their machinery. I would use a dedicated photo processor for assurance of better work. I have had some reprinted. But calenders? Go for it.

Yeah true, there’s not too much wrong that can happen with calendars...

Not too surprising of course but I feel like I took almost the exact same pic at Takachiho Gorge :)

Yeah I went there with my mum and soon realised there’s pretty much that one little spot where everyone shoots from. If you went there really early or really late and set up a tripod you might get something different with a long exposure but for most just doing a day trip up there the options are limited, aren’t they?

All my wall are covered with framed prints of my photos, but I have a photo lab print them; I don't own an inkjet printer anymore, and I'll be dead before I invest in that unreliable, pocket emptying racket.

Either/Or is fine by me. I think it’s just great to have hard copy prints of your work, regardless of who prints them.

Martin,
the huge difference to a lab is, that you can choose any paper or material, you want. I even printed on the very thin Japan paper. Even Whitewall has not the Hahnemuehle paper, that I prefer.

You also get instant gratification with a home printer, but both of those reason aren't enough for me to have to deal those wallet emptying devices. If you print every day, then sure; but leave that thing unused for a month and you're on a slow descent to hell.

There is something about a picture enlarged to life size. I been shooting so much but you are right we really don't even appreciate our work or others because we are constantly uploading to FB or IG and they get compressed. I have not printed any pictures in years but I have dreamed of having a studio and putting some of my work there. The other odd thing is that we photographers buy these 36mp cameras just to up load to these sites.

What do you mean by followers not able to see all of your work posted on Instagram or Facebook? They only have to check your gallery directly. No problem.

I have started printing my photos for the past few months and it's a learning experience

Yes there’s a surprising amount to learn with papers, inks, profiles, softproofing etc.....but satisfying once you get the knack

Excellent article -- well thought out. I have a website to show my images, and frequently go to it myself, just as you like to look at your prints (I also have many in my homes). It's a nice and reasonably inexpensive way to remind myself of what I think is my better work and, who knows, some day I may actually sell anther print.

Yeah I’m 46 years old. My dreams of dropping my current career for the vagaries of photography are long gone. Doesn’t mean I don’t love it as much as ever. Or don’t want to see the evolution of my work up on my walls :)

By far, the most satisfaction I derive from my images comes from looking at them myself, not from sharing them with others. I do post some of my best work online, because I need to make a living at this and can't really earn any money from my photos if I keep them all to myself. But there isn't really much satisfaction in having others see my work. The real deep down satisfaction comes from examining my images closely and being impressed with how beautiful the animal in the photograph is. I don't need any attention from others, and I certainly don't need positive feedback from others to feel affirmed. Just having my eyes be pleased with what they're looking at is all the satisfaction I need. Friends and family are often asking me to share more images with them, but I hesitate to do so because it doesn't really do anything for me. Some photographers seem to have a need to have others see their work all he time ....... I just never understood that.

We are own harshest critics (or should be). So if we can satisfy our own critical eyes then we should be happy with that. Certainly happy enough to want to see those images splashed all over our walls at home :)

You do make a good point about displaying images. When I do print, I only print on metal, because I just don't like how photos look printed on photo paper. Metal prints usually look pretty good, depending on the ambient light in the room they're hung in. But of course metal is expensive, and I like BIG prints, like anywhere from 36" by 24" up to 60" by 40".

In fact, I just ordered 3 big metal prints - two at 40" by 27" and one at 48" by 32" ...... they are scheduled to arrive on Monday. But those are sold to clients, not to display at my place.

Personally, I greatly prefer how photos look on my computer screen; to me that is the best way to view them. Why? Because on my monitor, the light is coming from inside the photo! With prints, we are looking at light that is reflected off of the surface of the print, just the way we see things in real life. Ever wonder why everything we see in the real world looks kinda, "meh", while things we see on our computer monitors look spectacular? It is because with our monitors, the light is coming from within!

So, if I ever invest serious money into "splashing those images all over my walls", then it will be with very large digital displays. I know they have "digital frames", and I love the way photos look on them, but they are so freakin' small. And expensive.

I want a 60" by 40" digital frame that has at least 120 pixels per inch. If they can make a 70" hi-rez TV for less than $1,000 retail, then why don't they make a super hi-rez digital frame for the same price? I never understood that ..... maybe its a volume thing.

Yes no doubt that the ‘zing’ of an image is amplified on a screen. If you could have digital screens placed around your walls at home rotating through your image folders that would be the perfect solution.

For metal prints, have you tried using Zno? I’ve had pretty good experiences with them

Iain,

I've not used Zno, but I appreciate the tip! I will check them out.

For metal prints, I used to use AdoramaPix. They were great, on a bang-for-the-buck basis. But last week I got on their site to order those 3 big metal prints, and - WOW - they raised their prices astronomically! They also changed their name to Printique. I suspect they changed their name because of the planned price hike ..... it's hard to jack prices way up if everything else about your brand and your products remains the same, so I suspect they changed their brand as a way to mask or justify the enormous price increase. But at their new prices, they have totally lost me as a customer (and I was spending an average of $1500 a year on metal prints with them).

So ..... I went back to my old standby - Fine Art America. They still have very reasonable regular prices, and were even having a 25% off sitewide sale, so the value was too good to pass up. The problem, however, with using FAA for metal prints is that they only offer the standard glossy finish. No satin. No matte. But they do print at any aspect ratio, so there's no need to crop or conform to any standard ratio, which is really helpful for those images that look best in nonstandard crops. And they price accordingly, by the square inch, so something like a 16" by 19" will actually cost a bit less than the more standard 16" by 20".

On a value-for-the-dollar basis, FAA now appears to be the best thing out there. But I am always looking for an even better value, and will be happy to look into your recommendation of Zno.

Thanks!

Yeah I use quite a lot, especially over here in Japan. The only problem is they reduced their range of sizes, so I’m not actually sure how big you can go with metal these days.

The biggest size that Zno offers in metal is 36" by 24" ..... which is smaller than I prefer. That is actually the smallest metal print I will ever buy. It is really hard to find a lab that meets my 3 requirements for metal prints:
- sizes up to 60"
- a choice of finishes, including matte and satin
- TRULY competitive prices ... like, no more than Fine Art America's prices

thanks for the info. I didn't know about FAA so that's a bonus to find out. Here's another option, but perhaps not what you're after. The more info the better though....
https://www.canvasfactory.com/split-metal-photo-prints/

On a totally different topic what alternative platforms other than Instagram or Facebook might you suggest for showing your work and having it seen?

To let people know you still exist, FB and IG are necessary evils. More IG for me for IQ. I have a website and like to use Quora as well. I’ve hd 5.6 million views using that. Takes some time answering questions though :)

Thank you Iain! I will have to check out Quora

I like this post.

I have some prints of my photos on walls in my home. They do motivate me now and then. But I'm the only one who sees them.

Most of us will never make the connections, or do the promotion, to get a gallery show. But some sort of public venue would be nice. I had some in a coffee shop once, it was fun, I might like to do it again. But that era seems to have passed. The places I go into now all seem to have stopped rotating the art years ago.