Is the Fuji X-T50 Worth the Upgrade?

Fuji’s X-T10 series has always been a favorite for its compact size, classic aesthetic, and affordability. Now, the X-T50 is here, bringing with it advanced technology from the more expensive X-T5, including a 40 MP sensor and in-body stabilization.

Coming to you from Christopher Frost, this informative video explores the Fuji X-T50. The X-T50 inherits several features from the X-T5, such as the 40 MP sensor and improved autofocus with subject recognition and tracking. It also offers video capabilities up to 6.2K at 30 frames per second in 10-bit 4:2:2. The camera’s body remains compact and attractive, available in black, charcoal silver, or silver finishes. However, its price point—$1,400 without a kit lens—positions it close to the X-T5, raising questions about its value.

Frost highlights the X-T50’s physical improvements, including a slightly larger body and a more comfortable grip. Fuji has also added a film simulator dial, a welcome addition for fans of Fuji’s unique film simulations. The camera includes customizable buttons, a responsive touchscreen, and an autofocus joystick. However, the electronic viewfinder is smaller and lower resolution than expected for this price point, indicating some cost-cutting measures.

The X-T50’s image quality is impressive, with the 40 MP sensor delivering detailed photos. At base ISO, the raw images show fine detail, although the JPEGs tend to be over-sharpened. Higher ISO levels introduce noticeable noise, particularly beyond ISO 1600. Despite this, the camera’s dynamic range is strong, and it handles shadows well, making it suitable for various shooting conditions.

In terms of video, the X-T50 offers multiple shooting modes, including 6.2K and 4K. While the 6.2K footage is detailed, it is also quite noisy at anything above ISO 400. The 4K high-quality mode provides excellent detail at low ISOs, but noise becomes an issue at higher settings. The camera’s high-speed 1080p mode at 240 frames per second captures impressive slow-motion footage, albeit with some false color and blockiness. The rolling shutter effect is significant in 6.2K and 4K modes, making it less suitable for fast-moving subjects.

The X-T50’s in-body stabilization works well, particularly with Fuji’s prime lenses, which lack optical stabilization. However, its digital stabilization does not significantly improve video stability, and the screen’s inability to flip outwards limits its usefulness for vlogging. Despite these limitations, the X-T50 remains a solid choice for still photography, thanks to its detailed images and Fuji’s renowned film simulations. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Frost.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
3 Comments

I upgraded from an X-T30/18-55mm to the X-T50/16-50mm and I am shocked at how much more camera I have. There is no question this is a superior camera in every way (ergonomics are a bit of a tossup).

It’s tiny size make it an excellent primary travel camera.

I spent months trying to find an upgrade to my Lumix G9. I finally settled on an X100vi, and while I liked the camera I couldn't live with a fixed lens. So, I bought an X-T50 and I am incredibly impressed at what Fuji have put into such a small package. Paired with the Fuji 35mm f1.4 it makes stunning images.

At a 60% increase in price, ... no. Also, to have it with compact pancake lenses (as I would use it) there is little point in the 40mp sensor. I only do still photography, so video is always a waste for me. I am also deep into the digital darkroom and only work with RAW so the film sim dial would be useless and a waste of space for me. 26mp is fine for me and I have never owned a camera with IBIS and have managed quite well without it. The XT30ii is more than good enough for me. I just hope they haven't stopped making it.