The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Macro lens is a versatile option for those who need high-quality macro capabilities in an affordable package. This lens is a remake of the original model for DSLRs, bringing updated features and enhanced performance that make it a strong contender.
Coming to you from Stefan Malloch, this thorough video offers a look at what makes the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di III VXD such a compelling option. The lens is equipped with VXD focusing motors, which provide quick, responsive, and nearly silent autofocus. Whether you're focusing on tiny subjects or using the lens for portraits and landscapes, the autofocus remains consistent and reliable. One of the standout aspects Malloch emphasizes is the smooth, creamy bokeh produced by the 12-blade diaphragm, giving images a pleasing, professional finish. He points out that even at wider apertures, the lens delivers exceptional sharpness across the frame.
However, the lens does not come with built-in image stabilization, relying instead on the camera body's in-body image stabilization (IBIS). This might be a consideration if you're using a camera without IBIS, particularly when shooting at close distances, where even the slightest movement can cause blur. Malloch compares it to the Sony 90mm macro lens, which does have stabilization, but notes that the lack of this feature on the Tamron isn’t a dealbreaker, especially considering the price difference.
Key Specs
- Focal Length: 90mm
- Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
- Lens Mount: Sony E
- Lens Format Coverage: Full frame
- Focus Type: Autofocus
- Image Stabilization: No
- Filter Size: 67 mm (Front)
- Angle of View: 27° 2'
- Minimum Focus Distance: 9.1" / 23.1 cm
- Maximum Magnification: 1x (1:1 Macro)
- Optical Design: 15 Elements in 12 Groups
- Diaphragm Blades: 12
- Dimensions: 3.1 x 5" / 79.2 x 126.5 mm
- Weight: 1.4 lb / 0.6 kg
Malloch also dives into the optical performance, showing side-by-side comparisons with other macro lenses. The Tamron delivers excellent sharpness, even in the corners of the frame, with minimal vignetting when shot wide open. As you stop down, the slight vignetting disappears, leaving a flawless image from edge to edge. Distortion is well-controlled, and chromatic aberration is nearly nonexistent, even in high-contrast areas, making this lens a reliable tool for those who need precise detail.
Another point Malloch discusses is the build quality and customization features. The lens has a robust build that feels solid but remains lightweight, and it includes a few thoughtful touches like a focus-limiting switch and a customizable button. This button can be set up for various functions using Tamron's lens utility software, which adds a level of flexibility. While it lacks an aperture ring, the focus ring is smooth and easy to use, giving you more control over your shots. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Malloch.
I left a comment on that video with questions that are unanswered.
It's best to actually buy the lens, not have it given to you by the manufacturer -and properly test it for its intended purpose, this wasn't the case in the video 'review'.
I was lucky enough to have an early copy leant to me by a store that I shall not name (because it'll cause issues with Tamron).
It possibly was a pre production version but didn't work with the focus stacking feature on some Sony bodies (such as the a7RV).
If you, like me, use focus stacking and upgraded to a camera with this function, paying MORE for a third party lens with LESS functionality would be a disappointment.
I was interested but since the majority of my days are spent using that feature for thousands of images per week, it alone rules this product out. Perhaps it'll work with a firmware update.
Aside from that, the lack of ability to quickly (like the Sony) go from AF (to quickly aquire focus) to MF (to find tune) is another disappointment, the Sony clutching mechanism makes doing that wonderfully efficient.
The Sony also stops down to and is usable at f22, which comes in handy, it has stabilisation in the lens which is superior to relying only on IBIS, especially for a (short) tele and it has focal point markings on the lens which isn't a big deal but is nice.
Did I mention the Tamron (iny country) is $200 more expensive than the Sony?
I really wanted to like the Tamron but these design decisions and the price don't make any sense.