I have long been a staunch critic of the street photography genre. One of the biggest problems I've seen over the years, most notably as a judge in dozens of major contests, is derivative work. In this article, I will discuss six types of street photographs that we simply don't need any more of.
My criticism of street photography is well-established. In 2017, I published an article questioning the ultimate purpose of generating billions and billions of street photographs. The article, which initially went viral, was later updated and republished here. I was criticized for being too harsh in the article, and yet, I still hold to my opinion. At the same time, I have come to appreciate the historical value that some street photography can provide. With this idea in mind, I think street photographers should focus more on depicting their contemporary times in a unique way and less on producing derivative work.
Making photographs similar to those that we have seen receive great praise in the past is an attractive idea. But, just like the writers who ran out to write an "Oprah" book to reap the rewards of her attention, photographers who merely copy the work of others will never achieve any lasting notability of their own. Good photography must disrupt and enrapture, it must expose us to new ways of seeing. Yet, what I see in contests and on social platforms like Instagram most often is just more of the same old, same old. I see people copying each other over and over and over. Here are the six types of photographs I see copied most often.
- The Umbrella Photo. Please, photographers, stop making street photographs of people holding umbrellas. I understand that there is something visually appealing about photographing a person with an umbrella, but does the world really need any more of these images? This kind of photo has been made in every way possible. I guarantee you that you cannot show me an umbrella photo that I will think is unique in any way.
- The Gas Station Photo. The gas station remains a favorite among rural American street photographers. It is, apparently, especially appealing to photograph the gas station at night. Or, perhaps, during the day if it is a vintage-looking station or one with a big rotating sign etc. Stephen Shore is likely to blame here. His work is nice, although largely attractive because of its vintage. At any rate, Stephen has the gas station covered. You can take your own foot off the gas when it comes to making this type of photograph!
- The Billboard/Person Photo. You know the one I mean, a person walking by a billboard or advertisement and somehow their hair lines up with a line on the ad or their head with the head on the billboard. This has been a huge trend in street photography over the past few years, and the look is now overdone. Jonathan Higbee has done quite a lot of this kind of work, for example, and his work is excellent. The point is, however, we don't need any more of it. Copying Higbee won't make you a superstar. Move on.
- Person in the Subway Car Photo. Bruce Davidson and Richard Sandler have it covered. We really don't need any more street photographs from the New York City subway system. Let me tell you a true story. A young photographer recently got himself in front of one of the most famous photography dealers alive. This young photographer proceeded to show a portfolio of subway photos — people looking through the windows, stuck between doors, as well as train cars passing with motion blur, etc. Good photographs in some way, however, the dealer looked at the guy and asked him one question: "Have you ever heard of Bruce Davidson?" Consider the subway done.
- The Light/Shadow Photo. Think Alex Webb for this one. You know, those images where a person is in the shadows and there are a few rays of light beaming across the frame. Maybe the fedora is illuminated, but the rest of the man is in the shadows. There is a red ball nearby (precisely lit up), and a child swings on a bar over on the edge of the frame. We have all seen a gazillion of these images. Look up the word hackneyed in the dictionary, and you will find one of these photographs. Alex Webb owns this type of photograph. He is king, you are not.
- The Random Looking Startled Stranger Photo. This one belongs to Bruce Gilden. Bruce has given birth to a whole generation of dudes with cameras running after old ladies on the sidewalk. You know, the woman with the cane and the Goliath sunglasses photographed from 4.5 inches away with a handheld flash on the side. Not only is this the most aggressive and intrusive kind of street photography, but it is surely overdone. Even Gilden himself has given up on making this kind of image. You should too!
I write this article partly tongue in cheek. Yet, I am also serious in a way also. I've been judging contests, reviewing street photography books, and writing features on street photographers in major magazines for more than a decade. I've seen a lot of street photography. I can really assure you, in very real terms, that making these kinds of images may get you lots of likes on Instagram, but they will never get you properly noticed as an artist. The work is derivative and visually tiring. We've simply seen too much of it. So, if your goal is to chase Instagram and Facebook likes from the masses, then by all means, carry on. If, however, you seek to make your mark in photography, you will have to work harder to enrapture and disrupt our way of seeing.
I really like your project but think it is more documentary than the over cliched street photography genre.
Thank you, I think you're right. I've recently been reframing that project as a photography documentary.
You forgot the photo of someone taking a photo. I've never seen a good or great photo of someone doing so.
Maybe you should check out Judy Dater's pic of Imogen Cunningham shooting Twinka Thiebaud. At the time (1974), Twinka was probably the most famous nude model in the country, if not the world. Imogen Cunningham was, I believe, either 90 or 91 and still creating art.
I had seen that photo a long time ago (and it is amazing) BUT she is not taking a photo of her.
Thanks, Charles. I agree mostly, but as "J E" points out, there are exceptions to all of these of course.
Of course. I did say that I have never seen one. I'll check out the above photo if I can.
wow. You sure triggered some of your readers. lol. As a long time aspiring photographer, I appreciate the challenge you put down. .
Thanks, Robert. Just my opinion. Nothing more.
no one owns a specific genre of photography. don't let anyone tell you to stop doing something just because they have seen enough of it. that's their problem not yours.
Thanks, Adam. Sounds right.
Interesting POV Michael...which strikes a familiar chord I must confess. 3 quotes came to mind after finishing a second reading :
1. "Vision is the art of seeing what is invisible to others" - Jonathan Swift
2. "Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower" - Steve Jobs
3. "Creativity is about 2 things; the way we think and the way we turn those thoughts into reality" - David Duchemin
Put another way...VISION+INNOVATION+CREATIVITY= Fresh Art, Not MOTS (More Of The Same).
Thanks, Dave. Good quotes!
Michael, perhaps you just need to change the title of this article „If you want to win a competition, stop…“
Likely true!
Nah, don't listen to these sh*t-post bloggers (Michael Ernest Sweet, you need to to read my blog about the type of articles not to write). As for you the established/aspiring/hobbyist Togs who fell for this clickbait droll, you just keep doing you and be great at it. The only wrong way to take a photo is to not take one at all.
Thanks, Mega PICKLE! Yes, everyone can have their own opinion. That's what makes the internet so great!
Please stop telling us what to stop taking photos of...
Hi Reginald, the article was, as it says, tongue in cheek. Just meant to highlight some of the rather worn subjects we see in street photography.
First, thanks Michael for the gracious responses that seemed to at least somewhat inhibit the usual thread breakdown spiral found at the end of most articles about . . . anything. Great article--it doesn't hurt to point out our own foibles once in awhile. I'm no art critic but I recognized your examples. Very useful and a reminder to stay out of the rut. And it is indeed easy to "go for the likes" on Instagram. I'm guilty. (But in no danger of becoming an Internet celebrity.)
Of course, Michael. I really do appreciate it when people take on my opinions. No one should just consume.
The most interesting observation in the article: "I write this article partly tongue in cheek. Yet, I am also serious in a way also. I've been judging contests, reviewing street photography books, and writing features on street photographers in major magazines for more than a decade. I've seen a lot of street photography." A dash of over exposure to street photography and a pinch of jaded observer. The recipe for a lament. There is nothing new under the sun - just variations on what already exists.
Tundrus Photo, you are probably right!
Thank you, thank you, thank you !!! You forget to mention take pictures of people with phones and now people with phones and masks. Every genre of photography just became extremely boring and cliche. When I see models with wings and all kinds of ridiculous clothing, over-edited waterfalls, sunrises and sunsets I realized that photography as an art form died 30-40 years ago and became indistinguishable mass production of cliches with very few exceptions. Certainly 90% of FB, Insta and YT people disagree but everything is subjective and most of them just subscribers and likes collectors. 20 years ago when you said "I'm a photographer", people said Ohh, now they say "me too".
Could not have said it better! What you say is so true... especially that last line.
Well I don’t take photos for contests. I don’t take photos to submit for publication. I take photos for fun and to impress my friends and family with my acumen. So I’m grateful for this article pointing out the 6 types of photos that have been popular through the ages and for links to masters of the craft so that I can study them!
Thanks, Larry! It's good that some still shoot for no other reason than personal fun!
Nothing is as much as an attempted buzz kill as somebody who assumes they're in a position of power to influence others. I don't care if you're a judge or the king of Mars. Let creativity rain. F stoppers frequently post filler as if they need to seem like they're an active important resource. Stick to writing things that bring out others creativity instead of trying to suppress it. And it seems to me authors of articles like this, which are pretty much clickbait, when those authors reply to every posting, it's really bad form. Let people have their say.
Thanks, John. You make great points. It was all just tongue in cheek as a way of highlighting, with drama, overdone subjects in street photography.
This article is so liberating! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Now that I know we already have enough photos and photographers in this world, I can save a lot of time and money by giving up the hobby. And, I was just about to buy a new lens just for those tricky umbrella shots. You saved me just in time. Phew!
P.s. only thing more annoying than unnecessary photos is the habit of offering a response to every single comment posted. Wait for it . . .
I have a right to comment too, David. Thanks for taking the article in the tongue-in-cheek spirit.
Having taken a scroll through the author's work, the irony in this article is strong.
Scott, interesting take on my work. I have never been told I make work similar to everyone else.
Scott clearly you have not actually looked at his work. I mean call it anything but certainly not cliche. He obviously offended some people here but probably people shooting umbrellas. Sweet always comes across as brash but often hits the nail on the head.
I did look at Michael's shots that are posted in his gallery here. The shots are different due to the Michael's processing style, which is very fitting to the genre. The subjects look like most other street images otherwise.
Clearly provocative but sadly all true. Street has really hit a dead end.
Thanks, Max. I don't think street is dead, just in need of refreshed vision.
I have a whole portfolio on empty and abandoned storefronts taken head-on...I'm in trouble...
Maybe it's time everyone stops taking pictures for consumption by others and start doing photography for their own enjoyment.
Now there's an excellent point! I think I might just go this route myself, Michael!
So I should stop selling prints?
So don’t make these cliched photographs, just work harder? Are you just a judge or can you provide some examples of your own work to show how you avoid the cliche trap?
I likely fall into the same trap, Sam.
Most things I photograph have very likely been done already many times over and it’s very hard to think about new and original so I usually don’t bother and to hell with it if someone finds my photographs too obvious. Taste is so subjective there are bound to be plenty of people who hate the sort of photographs any of us produce as well as those that appreciate them. Cliche can also mean different things to different people.
I think the only thing that is worth stopping is writing articles telling others what to photograph or what to stop taking pictures of...
Yes, I think that message was delivered. Thanks for your input though, Dirk. I appreciate the support by adding comments.
If anything bothers someone in photography, they only have to stop looking at the photograph. There is no reason to deny everyone the experience just to make a few happy. What appears to be 'old and boring' may be quite new to a novice seeking inspiration or example. So, I believe, it is best to let everyone take individual responsibility for themselves rather than expect everyone else to do so for him/her who objects.
Fair point, Pete.
Comments are always so dumb and rude on this site! Why is that. Instead of wasting your energy commenting on this article people (which the author clearly enjoys) just go out and spend that energy trying not to make old tired street photos. I tend to agree with this author in some ways if I am being truly honest.