The distinction between a good photo and a great photo is nuanced but significant, touching on the heart of what makes photography an art form. This fantastic video takes a look at the distinction and how it can help us improve.
Coming to you from Roman Fox, this enlightening video explores the subtle yet profound differences between good and great photographs. Fox argues that while good photos are technically sound, featuring proper exposure, focus, and composition, they often lack the depth to evoke further thought or emotion. He presents various examples to illustrate how good photos, despite their aesthetic appeal, may not engage the viewer beyond a superficial level. This distinction is vital, as it highlights the importance of infusing work with elements that provoke a stronger viewer response, nebulous as they might be.
Moreover, Fox emphasizes that great photos possess an ability to elicit reactions, emotions, or questions from their audience, transcending technical perfection. He showcases images that, despite not being the most polished, leave a lasting impression due to their ability to tell a story, evoke memories, or incite laughter. This approach to photography encourages you to look beyond the surface and capture moments that resonate on a deeper level. The video serves as a reminder that the essence of a great photo lies not just in its visual appeal but in its capacity to connect with the viewer on an emotional or intellectual level.
Fox's perspective is a call to action for photographers to strive for images that challenge, delight, or engage the viewer in meaningful ways, suggesting that the pursuit of great photos should be balanced with the technical mastery of good photos. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Fox.
Roman I agree with your analysis on the differences between good and great photos, you have provided great examples of both, but I can't help thinking there is one aspect that was not considered. The examples of great photos do look more interesting at first glance but would I print, frame and display them, probably not. However your examples of good photos all have a timeless feel about them and would be far more likely to be printed, framed and displayed. It seems to me that the good photos would stand the test of time but the great ones, once viewed, would more than likely stay on the computer. Thank you for great video!