The Light Eater: The Biggest Challenge of Large Format Portraiture

The Light Eater: The Biggest Challenge of Large Format Portraiture

Shooting portraits in large format film is extremely rewarding. There's a simplicity of the process, from the posing to the static camera position, that helps ground both the photographer and the subject in the moment. Beautiful images may be your reward for such patience, but it's not without its challenges. For me, the biggest challenge shooting portraiture is not working with the camera, but the insane amount of light you need to throw at it. For the uninitiated, here are some facts about the format and its light-eating characteristics that you may need to consider.

When I decided that I would use my 4x5 camera for my portraits for my American We project, I hadn't considered the amount of light I'd have to regularly throw at my subjects. I quickly found that my pared down kit of speedlights and umbrellas wasn't going to cut it. Here's why.

The Lenses

One of the first things you'll notice, especially if you're coming from a 35mm sized frame or sensor, is that the maximum lens apertures are much smaller than the format you're used to. A top quality 35mm portrait lens will usually have a maximum aperture of f/1.4 or f/1.2. You don't need to throw a lot of light at it to get a proper exposure. When you're dealing with typical large format portrait lenses, say a 210mm in 4x5, an f/5.6 might be as wide as you can get. So right off the bat, you're losing about four stops of light if you want to shoot wide open. That's fine in daylight outdoors, but when you start shooting indoors, you're going to need strobes with some power to get any action stopping going on. Either that or you're going to have to have a very, very still subject. 

Don't be disheartened by that large number, though. There's roughly a four-stop difference in depth of field from 4x5 to 35mm. So, f/11 on 4x5 would be the same depth as about f/2.8 on 35mm. And that's another reason you'll need more light: you don't need to shoot wide open on 4x5 to get shallow depth. In fact, if you want optimum lens sharpness, just like with 35mm, you'll want to stop down a bit. More light gone.

There are some lenses that have wider maximum apertures, but they don't usually fit into traditional leaf shutters, so you'd need a camera with a focal plane shutter to use them, such as a Speed Graphic

Jeffrey, Kodak TMAX 400, 4x5

The Bellows Factor

When dealing with the large format, you're more than likely using a camera with bellows. The bellows is the light-tight accordion looking thing that connects the front and rear standards of the camera and lets you adjust the distance between the lens and film plane so that you can focus. They're very handy and let you pull off some great effects and movements. However, because of the nature of bellows-focusing, the distance between the lens and film plane can vary greatly, and that needs to be compensated for. In order to compensate for it, there's a formula that you use. I use an app on my phone. Yes, I'm lazy. If you're as lazy as me but you're an iPhone user, try this one. On my wooden field camera, if my bellows are fully extended and I'm using my 210mm, I'll easily lose an additional 1.5 stops of light. When you're doing macro work on a big studio camera, the light loss can be even more significant, as the closer you need to focus, the further the lens needs to be from the film plane.

Even at medium distances, you still will easily lose a half a stop of light to bellows compensation.

Jeffrey, Ilford HP5 Plus, 4x5

Ways to Compensate


First of all, if you want to use artificial lighting at all, get powerful strobes. Most large format lenses have sync ports on their shutters so you can sync with no problems using cords or your favorite wireless solutions. I use PocketWizards with no issues. I use Einsteins and a Godox AD600 in the field and I've never been wanting for power. But that's typically shooting at no smaller than f/16 (roughly f/4 equivalent on 35mm). If you plan on doing really close work in studio, you may want even more power. A pack and head solution, such as a Dynalite or Profoto Acute2 might be the way to go for you.


Grain is not as much of an issue at large format sizes. You can get away with a grainy emulsion because the size of the negative will compensate for it. That's why I prefer to shoot 400-speed film. You'll get greater light sensitivity, which will counteract some of your light-eating factors. There are fantastic 100 and 125 speed films out there, such as Kodak T-max 100 and Ilford FP4 125, but I find that compensating for the slow speed is more trouble than it's worth in large format. I've been using Ilford HP5 Plus 400, Kodak T-max 400, and Kodak Portra 400 for color with no issues with graininess. 

Silas, Kodak TMAX 400, 4x5

Pushing Your Film

If you don't have enough light, pushing your film in development is always an option. One of the benefits to the increased tonality and larger negative of large format is that the hazards of pushing film, namely increased contrast and graininess, are minimized. Some films respond to pushing better than others, however, so if you think you might push your film to gain back some light, get a film that's known to perform well when pushed, such as HP5. The other factor when pushing film is the type of developer you're using, which brings me to my last way to compensate.

Picking Your Developer

When dealing in black and white film, the type of developer you're using matters. Some, such as Rodinol, are famous for the great amount of grain they bring to the table. That makes them less than ideal for pushing film, at least by normal developing means. You can stand-develop your film as well, and I've heard great things about that process, although I've never tried it. Ted Forbes did an informative video about stand-developing over at The Art of Photography if you're interested in it. For normal processing, developers like XTOLMicrophen, and DDX are very good for minimizing grain while pushing.

Aracely, Kodak TMAX 400, 4x5

It's Worth It!

Of course, I'm biased on this last point, but I totally feel that it's worth dealing with the light issues of large format. The results are beautiful and different from anything captured with a smaller frame. I just want you to go in with the knowledge that, just like any format, there will be challenges. Bring some flashes and your A-game and get shooting!

Log in or register to post comments


Joakim Drake's picture

That first portrait of Jeffrey is simply magnificent!

Hans Rosemond's picture

Thanks so much! Some subjects are born for the camera. He made my job easy.

Scott Edwards's picture

Really lovely work, Hans. Went to your site and as soon as I favored Jeffrey in the chair (brilliantly done), the image of Ryan seated and looking to his right (gosh, 4x5 is amazing) and Skeena sitting on the floor seemed to compete with that one image and the come-as-you-are portrait of your daughter. :) Regardless, I read and learned... thank you!

Hans Rosemond's picture

Thank you! The project is a labor of love and i hope it only gets bigger. I'll post more here on occasion if it's something people are interested in following.

Michael Aubrey's picture

These problems only increase in difficulty with some of the films unique to large format, like Ilford Harman's Direct Positive Paper, which produces dramatic black and white images, but is best rated at between ISO 3 and ISO 1.5. You need a lot of light--I use two White Lightning X3200.

Hans Rosemond's picture

I've been itching to try out positive paper, but still need to set up a basement darkroom. It looks like a lot of fun.

jean pierre (pete) guaron's picture

Love your article, Hans - to achieve anything worthwhile (in photography or art or any other creative field), the essentials extend to include building our knowledge base and putting in the hard yards to build our skill set. You've done a magnificent job - and it reflects in all your photos.

They bring back memories for me - I had a great uncle (actually great-great-uncle !!) who was one of the pioneers of photography here in Australia, where I live. Starting in the 1850s, he spent the rest of the 19th century capturing images of rural life on a large wooden field camera - he took his gear with him on a horse drawn cart - set up in a tent, to create his own collodion wet plate glass "negatives" in the field - exposure times often ran for minutes, even in broad daylight, apparently And no doubt that reflected some of the issues you raise - the lenses, the smaller apertures, the bellows and in his case, the sheer size of the image. It was amazing what he managed to capture, under those conditions - and when his collection was handed over to the State Archives, they thought they'd struck the mother load !!!

Hans Rosemond's picture

Always great to hear about people in love with the process of taking a photograph. I know this approach certainly isn't for everyone in this day and age, but it's great to know it still exists. Thanks so much for checking out the work!

Nick K's picture

Awesome work, Hans. Feels and looks modern, but yet timeless, something very few people achieve. I really feel like you captured essence of these people. It would be awesome if you could share with us your process of talking/guiding your subjects, and how to nail the lighting..

Taz Rahman's picture

Absolutely wonderful work and so inspiring! I still use an old 6x9 medium format folder from time to time when not working on my pro wedding or portraits, it is my dream to try out 5x4 one day!

Matt Barr's picture

Keep em' coming Hans. I always enjoy your articles. I would agree that LF defiantly is worth the squeeze, these are magnificent.

Terry Breedlove's picture

The iPhones app is for reciprocity failure not bellows extension. And most importantly your images rock

Brence Coghill's picture

Love these images Hans. Are you able to tell me what lenses you’ve been using for your wide and close crop images on your 4x5?
I’m getting started with large format and still figuring out what lenses will work best for what I want to do :)

Hans Rosemond's picture

Hi! I don’t shoot very wide, but when I do I use a 90mm. For environmental portraits I use a 135 or 150. For head and shoulders I’m using a 210, although I with for a touch more reach sometimes.

Dominique Filippi's picture

Thank you for your detailed article. I also shoot film, mostly with a 5x7 view camera and before reading your article, I was always reluctant to use a flash by lack of experience. I though you would need a lot of pricey Joules to get proper results with a large format camera. Thanks to your article I feel more confident to jump into strobes and to buy my first monolight (AD600BM). I really like the 4x5 portrait of Jeffrey you made with the TMAX400. Would a single AD600 be enough to get this kind of picture or did it require more powerful equipment ?

Hans Rosemond's picture

Hi! Sorry for the delay in answering. If you’re using 400 speed film an aperture less than f16, you should be just fine. Good luck!!