Canon is looking into resin (plastic) lens elements as a way to make professional camera lenses lighter, according to a newly uncovered patent. The patent outlines designs for zoom lenses that use plastic optical elements to cut down on weight, potentially revolutionizing the build of heavy telephoto lenses.
Patent Reveals Resin Optics in Zoom Lens Design
The Japanese patent application specifically describes several zoom lens formulas (examples include a 28-105mm f/4 and a 24-35mm f/2) where some lens elements are made of resin rather than traditional glass. In the patent text, Canon notes the key motivation: using resin elements can significantly reduce the weight of a lens.
Large-aperture zoom lenses typically require many glass elements, which makes them heavy. By swapping some for plastic, the overall lens could be much lighter and more compact. This approach might enable, for instance, a big 70-200mm or 300mm prime to shed a noticeable amount of weight – a change that busy pros would certainly welcome during long shoots. The idea isn’t entirely new; some consumer-grade lenses and compact cameras have used plastic optics in the past to save cost or weight. But it’s rare in high-end professional lenses because of performance trade-offs.
Overcoming the Challenges of Plastic Elements
Canon’s patent acknowledges the well-known downsides of plastic elements. Resin lenses are sensitive to temperature and humidity, which can cause them to expand, contract, or even slightly deform, leading to focus shifts or increased optical aberrations. In other words, a lens that works fine on a cool dry day might lose sharpness in hot or humid conditions if the plastic element changes shape. Nonetheless, Canon appears to be continuing down this path of research to make plastic viable for serious use.
According to the patent, Canon’s engineers propose novel methods to stabilize the performance of resin lenses despite environmental changes. One approach focuses on using high-dispersion plastic materials that are less prone to expansion from moisture. Another is an optical configuration trick: for example, placing a plastic element in a group with both positive and negative power lenses to balance out any focus changes if the plastic element swells or shrinks. Essentially, if the plastic element’s focal length shifts, another element in the group counter-shifts to compensate. The patent describes designs aimed at keeping the lens’s focus constant across a range of temperatures.
The patent specifically mentions addressing moisture absorption. Plastic can absorb water from the air over time, which not only changes its shape slightly but can even alter its refractive index (how it bends light). Canon’s documents suggest strategies like special coatings or sandwiching the resin element between glass elements to isolate it from the environment. The goal is a “lightweight, small-sized zoom lens that retains consistent optical quality despite environmental changes.”
Implications for Photographers
For photographers, the prospect of lighter telephoto or zoom lenses is exciting. Take Canon’s popular 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, for example – a staple for sports and wildlife shooters but a beast to carry all day. A lighter version with the same optical quality would be a relief (literally). Wedding and event photographers, who often lug around multiple heavy lenses, would also benefit. If Canon extends this tech to super-telephoto primes (300mm, 400mm, etc.), it could drastically reduce fatigue for those on safari or shooting field sports.
That said, it’s important to note this is just a patent at this stage. Camera companies patent many ideas that never become commercial products. Canon is likely experimenting and prototyping to see if resin elements can truly match the performance of all-glass designs in the real world. Image quality remains paramount – no one will accept a lighter lens if it produces soft or distorted images. Canon will have to ensure that aberrations, whether the light passes through plastic or glass. Moreover, professionals might worry about long-term durability: will plastic elements cloud, yellow, or scratch more easily over years of heavy use? These are questions Canon would need to address before any RF L lens with plastic hits the market.
The patent, however, shows Canon’s intent to innovate. In an era where mirrorless cameras are shrinking camera bodies, lens size and weight have become the next frontier. Other brands have tackled weight with methods like diffractive optics or fluorite glass to reduce element count. Canon’s potential solution: use a different material altogether. If successful, resin-infused lenses could maintain top-notch performance while being significantly lighter – a true win-win for photographers. While we might not see a plastic-element lens on the shelf this year, don’t be surprised if in a few years, Canon announces an ultralight professional lens, proudly touting some advanced polymer optical elements. It would be a tangible result of this research, and a hint that the venerable lens-making process can still evolve in the quest for portability.
Canon made a compact tele zoom with Fresnel elements years ago. What ever happened to that?
Absolutely. Why has Nikon come out with a whole line of pf lenses, whereas Canon is silent on that front? My 100-500mm is marvelous, and no doubt the exotic primes are amazing. But the sweet spot for dedicated bird photographers is in the $5k-$10k range for a compact, lightweight prime with near exotic-level IQ.
It's optical performance was mediocre, if not subpar. The only place it was useful was getting a 300mm lens into venues that require lenses to be shorter than a maximum length of around six inches.
As a wildlife photographer, I push the limits of temperature and climate. I love to photograph in southern Arizona in the summer, and I love to photograph in northern Minnesota in the winter.
Yesterday morning it was 13 degrees below zero Fahrenheit here at home where I was shooting songbirds. And in the summer it is routinely over 100 degrees, and I leave my lenses in my car 24/7/365.
If someone can convince me that plastic lens elements will perform just as good as the glass ones, in every one of the extreme conditions that I regularly shoot in, then I will be shocked.
Canon should consider the most extreme outliers instead of basing design decisions on the masses of people who use lenses in regular ways in regular conditions.
So the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many? No.
Canon should mass market lenses to meet the needs of the most potential buyers. They can also market higher end lenses to niche buyers who are willing to pay the higher price for the increased R&D cost per unit such low volume lenses incur.
No, the needs of the few do not outweigh those of the masses, but they should be prioritized nonetheless. Chasing whatever thing "outweighs" the other things is not always the course that leads to the most uniqueness and creativity.
Canon isn't in it for uniqueness and creativity's sake. They're in it to make a return on their shareholders investment. If a product will cost more to develop and manufacture than the projected revenue generated by producing that product will bring in, they're not going to lose money making it for you. If you just have to have a certain lens, buy your own lens making company and have at it.
I noticed the article emphasized reducing weight, but not price? It seems lens prices are going through the roof and getting worse. The real technology gain is to design lens cheaper without sacrificing image quality. On using plastic, the shelf life is no where near the level of glass.
Samyang
Was a Canon capturer way back in 2010 and then there was the 50-500 and 60-600 marketed for the travel lens a bazooka came close to getting one! I have been a Sony person since 2014 so my trials were the Sigma 150-600mm + 1.4X, 2X Teleconverters two years before Sony came out with the 200-600mm. A lot of things learned with both, first a heavy duty binocular harness to keep the lens on chest area while hiking or walking between shots - In YouTube videos everyone was getting the big thing out their bag that was on there back. Secondly with mirrorless there really is no need for the 1.4X Teleconverter reason a camera button for APS-C mode gets you 1.5X - today if you want you can enlarge if wanted but be real what do all the big lens people do any way they are always cropping even when zoomed to the max. Everyone always says they want fast glass but first look at the camera noise control is way better today and then in post noise reduction is most miracle thing ever seen so a high ISO image is no more a problem.
One use not very many talk about is lunar eclipses, I did one with the Sigma on a 8 hour 20 degree night and had to use a lens warmer on the protective clear filter to keep from freezing up but on camera with its 2X Teleconverter and that APS-C mode I got a full sensor image at 1800mm like, a lesson learned do not go beyond 600mm for you get stars also as an add to the story and for closer you just crop and enlarge in post but also you will want to reduce the size to do that complete from beginning to end most will just use one image and play with BUT the moon tilts clock wise so you have to do the whole thing time wise.
My second one I did from my front porch pointing over my house. OK for the whole deal the moon will be a the 12 o'clock position so you will be on your back pointing straight up. A tracker need to be big enough for the weight.
Back in the DSLR days if you used a teleconverter on a Canon/Nikon you would go above f/8 just putting it on and AF/AFC would work but it works beyond f/11 on a mirrorless.
The one thing missing form Canon/Nikon lenses is the very fast AF using electrical/magnetic rails.
Also never use a tripod to steady use a bipod with feet on the lower part faster to move around also easier to setup on a hill side.
I mention all mainly for the new photographers to think about. Like to take a warm day at a zoo that does not allow tripods and see how well your AF and IBIS works with the lenses OSS/IS settings better to learn before go for the money capture. Hint do push ups, pull ups and setups every morning and evening using a deck of cards to tell the number to do, so not all at once.
1. babies first wing spread form 100yds. away using 200-600mm + 2X teleconverter
2, using 24-240mm in APS-C for 360mm at 100 yards
3. Sony A7SM2 + FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS. ISO 6400, 155mm, F8, 1-10sec using Bipod
4 Glad to have Sigma 150-600mm + 2X Teleconverter on A7M3 2019 on a slew just below house using Bipod form a hill side viewing - Sigma is good but the metadata was bad with the Teleconverter something to check!