Does Having a Full-Frame Camera Matter?

One of the common beliefs in photography is that a full-frame camera is far superior to a crop sensor, but is this true? How much of a difference does a larger sensor provide?

When I began my career as a photographer, one theme I heard from others was that full-frame cameras were for professionals and crop sensors were for amateurs. I didn’t start to question this until I realized that two of the most successful photographers I knew were using cameras with crop sensors. After trying out their gear for a while and comparing to my Canon 5D Mark IV, I began to wonder if the difference was as significant as I had thought.

This video from Becki and Chris provides the answers to many of the questions you might have about sensor sizes. Here, these two photographers shoot several clips of the same scene with two different sensor sizes to demonstrate the differences that each provides. They then go on to explain the benefits to each option and show in what situations a full frame might honestly be better for you.

I will add that after experience with both full-frame and crop sensors, the larger size is not the ultimate goal I initially thought it to be. Many incredible photographers prefer their crop-sensor cameras, and companies such as Fujifilm have some excellent options right now. What is your opinion? How much does the sensor size matter?

Log in or register to post comments


Nick Rains's picture

Glad to see someone making this point. A good APS-C camera can produce results identical in IQ to a full frame camera. I have the Leica CL and SL (both 24MP), and use them interchangeably. When I show A3+ prints, no-one has ever picked one camera over the other. The differences are in the handling, not the IQ.

Rod Kestel's picture

Give Jimmi Hendrix a cardboard box attached to a piece of string and he'd sound awesome.
Give me a Stradivari and I'd still be crap.

Nick Rains's picture

I have seen that! Not Jimmi Hendrix obviously but at Tamworth Music Festival here in Australia. A street busker playing the blues on a homemade slide guitar made of a cigar box and (3) strings. Sounded awesome. Have the video to prove it!

Charles Lynn's picture

If most people believe that full-frame is better, it doesn't matter what the reality is.

Most clients and employers ask for full-frame, even though given a photo, none of them could tell the differences.

So long as you know what you are doing, an iPhone could do most of the ​jobs. But no one would like to believe their eyes, they only believe the magic word "full-frame".

Rod Kestel's picture

Here I am with my nearly 10 year old 7D, still loving it, rarely missed a beat. Never used a full-frame so what would I know?

michaeljin's picture

Like so many things in photography, it depends. I would say outside of pretty extreme situations, however, it really doesn't make a significant difference aside from the fact that most companies treat APS-C as a consumer thing and release inferior glass for it compared to their full frame offerings.

yanpekar's picture

20 min video talking about it...Whether it matters or not really depends on each ones individual needs. It also depends on whether you are looking at it as a photographer or as a client, or as a pro photographer looking to get hired or as an amateur or a pro photographer whose life does not depend on getting income from photography. In some areas, one of the requirements when clients are looking for a photographer is to have a full frame frame. It is not enough (or for some clients, it does not matter) that your images created with Olympus, Fuji or Sony look professional; their requirement is to have a full frame body. If you don't have it, you are not getting the job. You can spend time trying to prove that you can do the job with Olympus or Sony, but from the client's perspective (the ones who have this requirement), having a full frame is a must have requirement to be hired. In the city where I live, most briefs I get have a requirement "you must have a full frame body".

David Bolender's picture

I'm 1.6 m tall and 61 kilos. I guess I don't qualify for a "full frame body" ;-)

Pat McEntee's picture

I have found that those who want to micromanage my equipment will also want to micromanage the entire process.

Deleted Account's picture

Sometimes, the benefits of one thing over another aren't immediately obvious or apply to everyone. In my case, I'm getting older and my eyes aren't so good. A full-frame DSLR allows me to see things I never could with an APS-C camera. Mirrorless is out of the question so don't even go there!

yanpekar's picture

Good point.

Jon Kellett's picture

Hi Sam, why isn't mirrorless an option?

Deleted Account's picture

Not to be rude but I've answered that question several times over the past few years and only been insulted for my efforts. Suffice to say, I do my thing and everyone else should do theirs.

Marcus Joyce's picture

As you get older you become long sighted. Thus looking at a tiny mirror less oled a few mm away is going to be quite difficult.

As your younger who's short sighted it should be a win win

Deleted Account's picture

I'm not sure what you're getting at so can't see how it's related to my comment.

Marcus Joyce's picture

I can't reply based on my experience?

Deleted Account's picture

Of course you can. I just don't understand your point.

Marcus Joyce's picture

Ok so being long sighted is very useful when focusing on something far away so looking through a lens is easier. My parents use reading glasses to focus on a newspaper. But don't need anything while driving.

Mirrorless which uses a display in the eye piece which means your trying to focus on something very very close. I don't know how well the diopter helps in this regard.

I'm short sighted, and as I get older will fall into that category that needs varifocal lenses ughhh.

One of the hardest parts of photography for me is checking if the image is sharp or not and I find it very hard to do without chimping. I'm not saying my composition or photography is any good to start with!

My uncle gave an example with his 7100 he can look through the lens and take a photo but then needs to throw on his glasses to check settings or see how the photo came out. It frustrates the heck out of him. Despite loving photography.

Deleted Account's picture

I know what you mean. When it's critical, I have to bring my reading glasses to see the LCD or use my Hoodman Loupe. :-(

Rhonald Rose's picture

Real professionals use medium format :-)

Diogo Vasconcellos's picture

Real professionals use large format and develop their own film. Haha :P

Terry Waggoner's picture

Real professionals use oil based paint and brushes made from animal hair!!!!!! HA!..........

Pat McEntee's picture

Real professionals use a stick with a fire blackened end on a cave wall.

Terry Waggoner's picture

Not true...................who paid them to draw??........................they were prehistoric tagger's.......

Deleted Account's picture

It depends of the kind of photography you do…
Try to make a sport reportage with a Sinar P3, or even with an Hassy…

Timothy Gasper's picture

I own both. To me it doesn't really matter, but if I want more reach out of my long's good to have the option. IQ is about the same...except when I use certain films that can't be touched by my digital. All my professional work is done mostly with medium format though.

honderd woorden's picture

People thinking sensor size doesn’t matter shouldn’t buy “real” cameras. Smartphones can take pictures and videos and at social media size most people can’t see the difference anyway.
If you spend many thousands on an FF camera and lenses you should know why or be rich enough not to care.

PS, Fujifanboys thinking their crop sensor camera will get them the same results as cameras with bigger sensors should ask themselves why Fujifilm made the GFX.

00rob00 Rob00Rob's picture

This argument is usually coming from fuji fanboys. They never justify GFX and for argument sake since sensor size don't matter, then not get a 4/3 camera over a GFX or Fujifilm APS-C? That Olympus sport's camera should do lovely

Robert Altman's picture

It all depends on the setting... With good light and not needing a super shallow DOF a crop sensor will do just fine- low light/needing ultra shallow DOF you do have to deal with physics - no way around that....

Dave Haynie's picture

People thinking sensor size doesn’t matter shouldn’t buy “real” cameras. Smartphones can take pictures and videos and at social media size most people can’t see the difference anyway.
If you spend many thousands on an MF camera and lenses you should know why or be rich enough not to care.

PS. Canon, Nikon, and Sony fanboys thinking their full frame sensor camera will get them the same results as cameras with bigger sensors should ask themselves why Phase One made the IQ4.

PPS. Or maybe it's the photographer, not the tools.

More comments