Would you mount a large, metallic pink lens to your mirrorless camera? If it's super fast, you might. Kipon is banking on the distinctive color of its incredibly fast 40mm f/0.85 lens to attract consumers, but Kai Wong delves into why it's more than just a pretty lens.
Recently featured at this year's Photokina exhibition in Germany, the Kipon IBELUX 40mm f/0.85 Mark Ⅱ for Fuji XF Mount is a bokeh machine. As Wong demonstrates, it creates silky soft backgrounds when shooting wide open. However, an aperture that wide comes with the obvious drawback of an extremely narrow depth of field. The manual focus-only lens, therefore, can be challenging to shoot with.
Though it weighs in at 2.6 pounds, the hefty lens doesn't carry such a hefty pricetag, selling for a shade under $1,500 on Amazon.
Wong notes that the lens does show signs of chromatic aberration, something he hoped he wouldn't see in a lens at that price point. The lack of versatility makes this lens more suited to niche photographic applications than as an everyday lens.
What do you think of the Kipon 40mm f/0.85 lens's distinctive color? Would you mount it on your camera? Drop us a comment below, and tell us what you think.
send that monster back to R&D. Of course, if you don't like pink, the gay community will accuse folks of being homophobic. One more rant today.
It's not so much that you don't like pink and more that you accuse entire classes of people for being intolerant of your prejudice, but whatever dude. Your photos suggest an effort to be as hetero as possible. Doth she protest too much?
worry less about the sexuality of the lens. After all, X mount is a male to female bayonet mount.
I'd worry more about your own insecurity and inability to feel happy without causing suffering for people you dont even know.
The fact that it is quite spendy, suffers from some CA, and worst of all, it's manual focus means I'd never buy it. I like auto focus.
is this lens a netflix adaptation?
I'd buy it, regardless of color. But not at that price. I can get a 7 Artisans lens for much less and only go from .f85 to f.95. But frankly, my Kamlan 50 f1.1 is almost unusable at f1.1. And it gets quite a lot of CA and flare.
I'd expect this to be similar.