Spherical Versus Anamorphic Lenses: Which Is Better?

You may be familiar with the term anamorphic lens, but what is the difference between them and spherical lenses? Which is better for videography? Here is a comprehensive comparison of a wide array of both!

For the first few years of my photography I wasn't really sure what anamorphic lenses were. Then, when I knew, I didn't really get all the fuss. Now, a decade later, and without ever owning one, I am a disciple. It's difficult to narrow down what it is I like about them so much. Really, it isn't unique to anamorphic lenses though — I like lenses with character.

I know the shine has rubbed off of things like radial bokeh, but I still adore it and for me, anamorphic lenses in cinematography add a dimension I just can't get enough of. The barrier has always been price, but with many companies looking to resolve that one way or another, we probably aren't far off truly attainable options for indie filmmakers.

What do you make of spherical versus anamorphic lenses? Is the fuss about anamorphic lenses unjustified? Or, are you an addict to the results and just wish the lenses were a little cheaper? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Rob Baggs's picture

Robert K Baggs is a professional portrait and commercial photographer, educator, and consultant from England. Robert has a First-Class degree in Philosophy and a Master's by Research. In 2015 Robert's work on plagiarism in photography was published as part of several universities' photography degree syllabuses.

Log in or register to post comments