Using the Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor as Intended: for SCIENCE!

Using the Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor as Intended: for SCIENCE!

You've probably never used a circular fisheye lens properly, which is to say in the manner it was designed. It's okay, almost no one has.

Circular Fisheye Lenses: A Brief History

Circular fisheye lenses date back a century with the Hill Sky Lens, the first 180-degree lens, released in 1923. Less than 40 years later, Nikon released the 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor, a lens designed for two specific scientific purposes and some incidental creative use. Most people know this lens because of the iconic Nikon F press photos taken with this lens mounted on the original F, but very few of us have actually gotten to use it. At the end of this article on the technical aspects of the lens, I'll also include some non-technical sample photos I took with it to show how it performs in creative use.

Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8 Lens Diagram | Adapted from the Nikon Lens Manual

Nikon released the 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor primarily for use pointed straight at the sky. This allowed photographers to capture clouds and cloud movements, measure the distance of objects from the sky's zenith, and measure the angular distances between two objects in a straight line from the zenith. To help photographers photograph clouds, Nikon included six filters built into the lens as part of the optical path. The video below shows the effects each filter has. Following the video, a table presents the filter information as reproduced from the lens' manual.

Reproduced from data in the Nikon manual, this table also provides some added detail that I input from experience.
Note that the EV compensation is a factor and needs to be converted to stops. 2X is one stop; 6X is 2.5 stops.

The video below shows how proper lens alignment allows the whole sky to be in frame with the horizon along the image's perimeter. This capability of this lens, specifically, means that the Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor has measurement capabilities for the placement of objects within the sky. This article examines, in depth, how to use this lens for object measurement along radial lines emanating from the sky's zenith. Not all circular fisheyes can be used this way, and even those that can, the calculation tables provided by Nikon for this lens are specific to it. The Nikon 8mm from the early 1960s has exceptional correction to eliminate magnification shift over the image field and to provide exceptional radial symmetry from the lens' optical center, as the data we'll review show. These technical corrections make measurements with this lens possible.

Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor: Scientific Use

But why? What use does the following process have? This process can be used to help measure object movement through space. For instance, a comet could be tracked for many nights to calculate trajectory, speed, and direction. Satellites could be recorded over a span of minutes for the same purpose. Tree canopies could be recorded from the same location to measure growth over months or years. The orbits of planets could be plotted against the zenith to study their rotation around the sun. Cloud size could be measured for estimating the water volume they contain. Knowing the geometry behind this lens' scientific use opens a number of doors for interesting and creative projects. Let's imagine that we've discovered a meteor heading toward Earth and we want to track its progress.

So, let's dive in: How do we do this? First, we need a photo taken with the lens pointed, level, directly at the sky. For the purposes of this article, this photo of a very-stern Abe Lincoln at the Lincoln Highway Memorial near Laramie, Wyoming, works. We also need to know that the image circle is 24mm across on the film or your full-frame sensor. These two givens, level image with a horizon around the perimeter and the image circle size, let us start to work on our calculations.

Calculation Test Photo | Sony A7S II | Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor | Laramie, Wyoming

Step 1: Identify the Image's Center

Back in the day this either required tiny measuring tools, negative masks in the enlarger, or highly accurate image enlargement. Today's photo editing software makes this step a breeze. This can be done in Photoshop, as an example. I find it even easier to do this work in Affinity Designer or Adobe Illustrator, however. The center point will be the basis for most of our calculations. The center point, for reference, is also the zenith if the lens has been aligned properly.

One-point lines (approximately five pixels) aligned to the image center help identify the exact center.
Snapping the end of a measuring line to the intersection ensure accurate zenith measurements.

Step 2: Use Pixel Counts to Create a Radius Line

Place a line from the zenith to the image circle's perimeter, anywhere, and then create dashes for measurement. The dashes will vary by your camera's sensor resolution. I used a Sony A7S II, which has a vertical pixel height of 2,832 pixels. Half that height, 1,416 pixels, represents 12mm. That means that each millimeter is 118 pixels long. So if I want to make accurate measurements to a half millimeter, a dash-space pair where each part is 59 pixels long lets me easily measure to a half millimeter, and roughly gauge quarter-millimeter spacing. The instruction manual for this lens provides the tools needed to measure zenith-subject and subject-subject angular relationships to a quarter millimeter. (If you were so inclined to measure to a tenth- or hundredth-millimeter accuracy, the instruction manual data allows extrapolation for that.) The two images below show multiple 12mm lines in different places, which verifies that the zenith is placed accurately. The second image adds the dashed measuring line.

Four demonstration lines confirm that the intersection is the zenith.
This step is only for demonstration in this article.

Using the image size and some basic division confirms the demonstration line is properly sized.
The dashed line is set up based on the image's size for accurate-to-the-pixel measurements.

Step 3: Select a Subject

For this example, we'll use the top of the tree in the upper right quadrant, solely because it's an easily identifiable point. Using our dashed line, which I've anchored the rotation for at the zenith, we'll rotate the line until the dashes align with that subject point. For clarity, I marked the subject with a circle. We know that each line and space are a half-millimeter. Counting the lines and spaces, we find that the tree's tip is 10.75mm from the zenith.

Setting the dashed line's rotational axis at the zenith lets us rotate it to measure any point anywhere in the image.

Step 4: Reference the Manual's Technical Data

I reproduced the pertinent technical data below. Using the graph, we can plot the millimeter difference and identify that the tree's tip is approximately 77 degrees from the zenith. That seems pretty close, but if we're using this to track a meteor headed for Earth then maybe we want more accurate numbers. For that more accurate number, we can use the table. The table lists 10.5mm and 11mm, and those points are 77.94 and 81.75 degrees from the zenith, respectively, a difference of 3.81 degrees. 10.75mm falls in the middle, so if we split 3.81 degrees (1.905 degrees) and add it to 77.94 degrees, the tree tip is exactly 79.845 degrees from the zenith. Hey, our 77-degree measurement wasn't too far off.

The chart on the left provides data at a glance. The table on the right provides more data accuracy.

And that's it. That's what this lens does, right? Well, no. There's another trick. Let's go back to that meteor, and assume we're trying to ascertain progress and trajectory. Going back to our original image, let's find two points on that image and calculate the angular difference between them. These will be different solely because there are no other good points to reference in the line from the zenith to the tree tip. This next trick requires that you picture the lens' image as a half-sphere. The measuring point is in the center, halfway to the imaginary nadir, at the half-sphere's flat bottom. The image the lens projects can be thought of as being painted on the upper, round portion of the half-sphere. We'll be measuring the angular difference from the center on the flat bottom to two points on the sphere's surface. The graphic below, adapted from the lens' manual, shows this concept and illustrates measuring points.

Adapted from an illustration in the lens' manual, this represents the half-sphere and the point for measuring angular placement along a radial path.

Step 4: Identify Two Subjects on a Radial Line

Here we'll be using Angry Abe's deeply-furrowed brow and a random bit of mortar between two stones. These two points line up pretty well. Below is the revised image with the two subjects marked. Let's pretend that these points represent two changes in our meteor's trajectory over the span of a week, as shown on two separate images that we've overlaid.

I've marked two subjects on the Abe Lincoln statue that we'll use to demonstrate angular calculations.

Step 5: Measure the Distance Between Two Subjects

For this example, we need two subjects on the same radial path, which is to say that they need to have a common trajectory toward the center. (A subject that's moving tangentially to the center can have its path and velocity calculated but it requires some significant math that understands the spatial geometry of cones. I am not the photographer to tell you about that.) Measuring the two points we identified indicates that they are roughly 2.5mm apart. The table in the instruction manual has a third column and that allows us to calculate the angular distance. The third column is offset by a half-line so that we can calculate to quarter-millimeter accuracy. Doing so from zero lets us know that the difference is 3.59+3.59+3.59+3.61+(3.61 / 2) = 16.185 degrees.

I've rotated the dashed line to cross the points we want to measure. This allows us to make accurate angular calculations.

Step 6: Calculate from the Correct Points

Let's do this correctly this time. If you see in the table's third column, the angular degree differences change slightly as the distance from the zenith increases. So we need to calculate the distance based on how far the objects are from the zenith. Abe's brow is 7.75mm from the zenith and the random bit of mortar is 10.5mm. So to obtain the actual and correct angular difference for these objects we start halfway between the 7.5mm and 8mm readings in the table's third column and add until we get to 10.5mm. Because the third column is offset, unless both measurements align with the spaced in that column, one or both of the starting figured needs to be divided. (3.83 / 2)+3.79+3.80+3.82+3.87+3.84 = 21.035 degrees. That's a fairly significant difference from our first calculation if we're trying to let the world leaders know how long until our meteor arrives. A note here, if the first measurement had been 7.9mm instead of 7.75mm, we'd have started with (3.83 / 8) instead of (3.83 / 2). The initial and concluding divisions in the calculations are proportional to the fractional millimeter that we've counted.

The red box added to the table shows the angles that correspond with each half-millimeter as counted away from the zenith (0.0).

High School Math Is Useful

And there we have it, all that math you told your high school teacher you'd never need used here in practical application! One key point, this will not work with all circular fisheye lenses equally. This Nikon lens is, as the angular distances in the table above demonstrate, highly corrected and the light rays bending through it are kept in relatively uniform configuration. In video samples with this lens, objects grow larger as they approach the lens center, definitely, but they do so at a uniform rate. In many circular fisheye lenses, such as the inexpensive ones being produced for aperture-priority shooting right now, the magnification across the image plane changes dramatically, especially toward the image's center. This leads to objects growing in magnification drastically as they move in the image field and that means those lenses are not corrected suitably for scientific use. So this technique may be achievable with other lenses, but the numbers and tables needed for calculations will be drastically different.

This same process applies if you use the zenith as one of the two subject points to track movement longitudinally across many images. Taking multiple readings of an object as it travels in relation to the zenith can, with some more complex math that turns our simple "V" shape into the skin of a cone, allow for detailed understandings of trajectory, velocity, and potentially even subject-observer distance. Imagine plotting that for the airplane in the above video with a different angular reading every second and you can probably imagine the process' challenges (and why I'm not the photographer to do this math for you.)

Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor: Creative Use

All of that understood, how is this lens for regular use? Here are six photos taken with it that will appear in my Round Glass Review video on this lens (which will go live in late May 2022.) Like all circular fisheye lenses, this does have some good and creative applications outside of the technical. It's also fun to use. The fixed focus of 20cm to infinity makes it very easy to point and shoot. The circular image also means that poorly-aligned photos can be corrected in post by simply rotating a crop around the image's center. The only stress with this lens is whether or not you will damage it, or if it will damage your camera.

Classic Blue Ford Mustang | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

Taken in Laramie, Wyoming, this type of shot seems to be a right of passage for people who review this lens.

The Library, Laramie, Wyoming | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

Just a quick note: No one believes you were studying.

BNSF 2592 | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

This was only safe because I was on the other side of a fence. Seriously, never get this close to a moving train for a photo. Here's a video from later in the train if you're interested:

Steel Truss Walkway Bridge | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

The idea that circular fisheye lenses distort everything is incorrect. The good ones do not distort lines parallel to the lens' optical center.

Crane | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

This photo shows how a straight line on a radial axis from the zenith isn't distorted, which is why all the math we did earlier works so well.

Water and Ice | Sony A7S II | Nikon Fish-eye Nikkor 8mm f/8

Yes, at f/22, the water drops on the lens' front element will almost be in focus.

I hope you have come away from this article with a greater appreciation of how well this lens was engineered, by engineers using primitive computers and analog calculation devices. This is a lens that, today, truly belongs in the hands of scientists, meteorologists, collectors, or museums. It's a beautiful and fun lens, but much more so, highly impractical. I hope these photos and explanations helped you understand the magic of the Nikon 8mm f/8 Fish-eye Nikkor bit better.

David Hancock's picture

David Hancock is a professional writer and photographer located in Denver, Colorado. Most people know him from his eponymous YouTube channel directed at helping learning photographers improve their work.

Log in or register to post comments

Not to be a pedant, but…
OK, I’ll admit I’m a pedant! The locomotive you have identified as BNSF 2592 is in fact UP 2592. While that may not be important to the casual reader, the locomotive DOES have a Union Pacific logo, is painted in UP yellow which is different from BNSF orange, and some people (as well as locomotives) will be offended by this misidentification!


Good catch and I can't edit the article now.

Perhaps I missed it, but one scientific use of circular fisheye projections is counting objects.

So-called "rectilinear" wide-angle lenses preserve angles at the expense of distorting areas. Although there are different fisheye projections, they generally do the opposite: preserve areas at the expense of distorting angles.

So for example, an ecologist could point his fisheye at a field of flowers, count the number of them in, say, one square centimetre, and then multiply by the total area of the flowers to get the total number of flowers. You just can't do anything like that with a rectilinear lens.

I find them fascinating, and have four different ones!

Thank you! I didn't know that was a thing these could do.

Quick, what percentage of the sky is covered by clouds in the image above?

You can quickly come up with a decent guess, faster than you could even come up with a process for calculating it, if all you had was a rectilinear lens!

For a guess, sure, but not for an accurate reading, and for the same reason that a flat map of the planet is okay for guessing at relative landmass shapes but can't be used for sizing accuracy.

I believe this lens was famously used by BBC Nature in perhaps the 1970s in Antarctica to create a piece of timelapse showing the sun never setting.

It was more famously used as the eye of HAL in 2001 Space Odyssey with a laser pointing through it

I did not know either of those. Thank you!

Love circular fisheyes, have a Nikkor10mm op, 8mm 1:8, 7.5mm 1:5.6, 8mm 1:2.8. Not for scientific use!