Photographers can be both nostalgic and habitual, finding a piece of gear they really love and sticking with it for a long time. Most of us have some piece of gear we love and won't ever part with. This one is mine.
I'll be the first to admit that I love gear. I've always been a tech nerd, and I enjoy the gadgetry of photography and seeing what these amazing little boxes can do almost as much as I do the artistic side of it. Several years ago, I saw a photo in a Facebook group that I could tell was unlike anything I had seen before. It was clearly from a long telephoto lens given the compression, but it had remarkable sharpness and an undeniable three-dimensional pop. I'd seen 85mm and 135mm wide aperture shots a lot, and I owned a few lenses of that nature myself, but this was something else. It turned out that it was the Canon 200mm f/2L IS USM lens.
A little background on this lens: if you're a Canon fan, you might know of the EF 200mm f/1.8L. It was a legendary lens, known for its extreme aperture given its focal length, wide-open sharpness, ruggedness, bokeh, autofocus performance, and more. About 8,000 copies of the lens were made, before it was discontinued due to lead in the manufacturing process. Canon released an updated version in April 2008, reducing the maximum aperture by a third to f/2.0, but improving sharpness and adding image stabilization, a great feature given the lens' longer focal length, and thus became the 200mm f/2L IS USM. Given its rugged build, autofocus speed and accuracy, sharpness, and focal length and aperture, it was quickly adopted by sports shooters and photojournalists, also finding a secondary place with fine art portraitists and the occasional wedding photographer. It's the shortest of the Canon "big whites," so named for their light exterior paint coatings that help to deflect heat and prevent the elements from expanding inside.
When I saw that photo, I immediately found other photos made with that lens on Google and became more enamored. There's really nothing that compares to the combination of such a wide aperture at such a long focal length. Then, I found the price, and my heart sank. At around $6,000, my poor grad student budget couldn't even afford to dream of such a lens, let alone afford it. Once I finished a big project for my master's, I treated myself to renting it for three days — big mistake. I was hooked. The photos were just as gorgeous as I had hoped. And unlike most wide lenses, this was stunningly sharp even at the maximum aperture (I mean, notice how every photo in this article was shot at f/2); it begged to be shot wide open. I was awfully sad to put it in the box when those three days came to an end.
So, I started taking on extra jobs in between my academic duties and slowly putting away money. After about a year of saving, I was about two-thirds of the way to what I needed, and I was getting too excited to wait much longer. So, I hopped on Fred Miranda and started watching the used forum. Unfortunately, such a lens is relatively rare, and those who own it generally hang onto it for the entirety of their careers. One copy came up after three weeks, but it was in pretty rough shape and not particularly well priced. Then, two weeks later, a like-new copy came up at a ridiculously good price, as the owner needed to sell it quickly. I messaged him within two hours of the listing going live, and half a day later, it was on its way to me. I named it the "butterfly bazooka," because using it in most situations is like killing a butterfly with a bazooka — way more than you probably need, but you're sure to get the shot.
As I quickly learned, 5.5 lbs will wear out your wrists rather quickly, so I purchased a nice monopod to use and set about shooting with it. While I initially fell in love with it for portraiture, which it most assuredly excels at, part of what makes it such a great lens is how versatile it is. I shoot a lot of classical music concerts, and unlike regular concerts, I can't get anywhere near the stage, which means I need long lenses with wide apertures to deal with the dim concert hall lights. Enter the 200mm. Shooting sports? The 200mm has blazing autofocus speed, sharpness, reach, and lets in plenty of light. Weddings? It's a great lens for artistic portraits. In addition to the light-gathering power, that wide aperture throws everything in the background into a gorgeous, nebulous blur, meaning you can aim and fire with ease. It's by far the most versatile lens I've used, and I can drop it into numerous shooting scenarios, and it always excels and amazes me with what it produces.
I've mostly moved away from Canon bodies and lenses, but this lens will always stay with me, and it's hard to beat the combination using it with a Sony sensor. Is it weird to have a somewhat emotional/nostalgic attachment to a piece of gear? Probably a little. But then again, isn't that part of the creative process? If you have a tool that inspires you and makes you happy and excited to get out and make images, by all means, embrace that tool. Some artists have a muse. I have a big hunk of glass.
I buy and sell a lot of gear just because I enjoy playing with camera gadgets and the like, but the 200mm f/2L will forever be in my possession. It's incredibly versatile and delivers stunning results no matter what situation I put it in.
Do you have a piece of gear you'll always keep? What is it? Tell me about it in the comments.
I want to sell my Fuji XT-1 and think tank shapeshifter ver2 for the canon 80D. Love that camera.. made a mistake selling it..
My 5D SR inherited from my Father-in-law.
I have an old Ricoh KR-10 Super; and will never sell it as it was my first SLR and given to me by my mother for Xmas.
Sony 100-400 GM. I have never had a lens perform this well. However, I am wondering if I will fall in love with the 135mm GM when I finally get one, and then leave this zoom at home. The former is an incredible lens. With the latest firmware, it is even better!
It wasn't long after I bought my first Canon DSLR (20D) that I began to want the 200mm f1.8. My budget and need didn't warrant such a purchase but that desire never went away. Once the 200mm f2L IS was introduced, I had hoped the 1.8 version might drop from its somewhat high used price for a lens which is no longer serviceable.
As time went on the 1.8 level off but was still rather salty. I continued to build my glass collection up filling actual needs such as a 300 f2.8 L and 400mm f4 DO II. As that was mostly done, I began to look more closely at the 200 f2 vs the 200 f1.8 versions and saw the f2L with IS creep lower in resale value making it more and more attractive.
One day KEH had a sale and they had the 200mm f2L IS in stock. I thought about it for a few hours but when I went back to buy, it had been sold. A few months later, I didn't hesitate during the next sale and grabbed an EX+ version for $3,800.
I love that lens and while many folks walk around with a wide on a camera, I usually have the 200 on mine. It is not inconspicuous but I really don't care. :)
My EF 85mm F1.2 l MII
My only forever equipment is my backdrop stand. 7 year itch will probably be my crop sensor setup and lights. 3-5 might be my 77d. My R6 lasted about 1.5-2 years along with a cheapo 50mm and kit lens.