If you're considering the Canon EOS R5, R5 Mark II, or R3, you’ve likely wondered which one fits your needs best. Each camera brings distinct advantages, from advanced video capabilities to top-tier autofocus. Here's which is best for you.
Coming to you from Jared Polin of Fro Knows Photo, this detailed video compares the Canon EOS R5, R5 Mark II, and R3. One of the most significant upgrades in the R5 Mark II is the 45-megapixel full-frame stacked sensor, offering faster performance than the R5's traditional sensor. The R3, on the other hand, has a 24.1-megapixel sensor but offers better high ISO performance, making it ideal for low-light situations. The video also highlights how the new stacked sensor in the R5 Mark II impacts dynamic range and overall image quality, particularly in fast-action shots.
Polin points out that the R5 Mark II’s pre-shooting feature is a game-changer for sports and action photography. This function lets you capture images up to half a second before you fully press the shutter, giving you more flexibility to get the perfect shot. This is something the R3 lacks, even though it’s often seen as a superior camera for fast-paced shooting. While the R3 does offer a slightly better rolling shutter performance, the trade-offs make the R5 Mark II a compelling option for many photographers.
The discussion also touches on ISO capabilities. The R3, with its lower megapixel count, handles high ISO better, producing cleaner images in low light. However, Polin explains that in real-world use, the R5 Mark II and R5 still perform well at moderate ISO levels, especially when paired with high-quality lenses. For those who don’t regularly push their cameras to extreme ISO settings, the difference may be negligible. Polin emphasizes that the R5 Mark II’s versatility, from high frame rates to its enhanced autofocus system, makes it a well-rounded choice for most types of photography.
If you’re also considering video capabilities, the R5 Mark II stands out with its impressive video specs, including 8K recording and 4K at 120 frames per second. It’s almost like having a cinema camera in your hands, and Polin stresses that its video features rival those of dedicated video cameras. The R3 also performs well for video but lacks some of the advanced options found in the R5 Mark II. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Polin.
