Sigma recently released the Sigma 300-600mm f/4 DG OS Sports lens, and it has quickly gained attention for good reason. Professional sports and wildlife photography often demands top-tier lenses, usually prime optics around 600mm, but these come with steep price tags. Sigma's newest lens offers substantial savings, priced significantly lower than comparable prime lenses, while providing impressive zoom flexibility and performance.
Coming to you from Christopher Frost, this straightforward video breaks down what makes the Sigma 300-600mm f/4 DG OS Sports lens stand out. At a focal length of 300 to 600mm, with a constant maximum aperture of f/4, this lens bridges a notable gap for photographers who crave versatility without sacrificing image quality. Frost notes the lens handles very well, though at nearly 9 pounds, it's advisable to use support like a monopod or tripod for extended shoots. The build quality rivals top-tier lenses from Canon and Sony, constructed from weather-sealed magnesium alloy and sporting intuitive controls for stabilization and autofocus. Image stabilization on this lens notably improves handheld shooting, especially at longer focal lengths.
Optical performance matters significantly, and Frost's testing highlights its strengths and subtle limitations. Sharpness at 300mm is excellent wide open at f/4, though closing down to f/5.6 delivers optimal sharpness. At 600mm, the lens maintains impressive sharpness wide open across the frame, closely matching dedicated prime lenses. Autofocus is consistently accurate and quick, capable of confidently tracking fast-moving subjects, an essential feature for action-heavy photography.
Key Specs
-
Focal Length: 300 to 600mm
-
Maximum Aperture: f/4
-
Lens Mount: Sony E, Leica L
-
Image Stabilization: Yes
-
Filter Size: 40.5 mm (Drop-In)
-
Minimum Focus Distance: 9.2' at 300mm to 14.8' at 600mm
-
Optical Design: 28 Elements in 21 Groups
-
Diaphragm Blades: 13, Rounded
-
Dimensions: 6.6 x 18.5 inches
-
Weight: 8.75 pounds
The versatility offered by zooming from 600mm down to 300mm can't be overstated. Frost emphasizes the practicality of quickly adjusting focal lengths in dynamic shooting environments. For wildlife photography, zooming out provides a quicker minimum focus distance, making spontaneous close-up opportunities feasible without switching lenses or missing the moment. The lens also handles well in challenging lighting, minimizing flare and maintaining contrast effectively. Its performance on both full frame and APS-C sensors ensures broad usability across camera types. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Frost.
The hook is F/4 constant. vs 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM. My first big telephoto was the 150-600mm and it work great on my A7RM2. As far as needing a constant f/4 not needed. the only problem was at the time was the adapter to the Sony camera. Even the 1.4X and 2X teleconverters worked. What I found by research was at the time it was mirrored cameras that had a problem with teleconverters making the setup above F/8 for AF was a problem but on my Mirrorless A7RM2 was good to f/11 but above that tracking, but never had a problem the whole time I had it. I got the Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS Full-frame Telephoto Zoom G Lens with Optical SteadyShot Because it was a Sony and no need for an adapter, The adapter on the Sigma to Sony made the metadata wrong!
Today with most all camera makers now mirrorless and most all post processing programs having noise reduction and sharping a miracle by old programs not very good.
Just me here, not a pro, but I get great bokeh and depth of field even with the 2X teleconverter at the full 600mm setting getting 1200mm but even set to 1800 with in camera cropping in APS-C mode turned on.
I know the pro's have to take a sporting event and send directly to the office head quarters so as to post like in a second and post processing gets in the way of time. But a regular photographer, hobbyist like me, will have more than one could handle of things to do with the Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS Full-frame Telephoto Zoom G Lens with Optical SteadyShot.
As for getting a close up of the moon just stay at 600mm you will get stars also making it a complete story of say a lunar eclipse not looking like a PS colored stock moon.
Great photos!