The Peril of Lowering Your Prices to Compete

The Peril of Lowering Your Prices to Compete

When a photographer is desperate for bookings, an inexperienced business owner will turn to the only option they know of: lowering their prices. Before doing this, you should consider all of the other options you have before deciding to compete with others on price.

Most photographers are artists learning to be business owners, not business experts learning to be artists. The majority of us have significant shortcomings in knowing how to market ourselves. Usually, we don’t know what our potential clients want, so in our best attempt to compete with hundreds of other photographers, we decide that undercutting on price is the only way to gain traction. It makes sense. We don’t know how else to stand out. I want to take a step back, though, and view this method from outside our industry to help us understand what a client wants.

Looking Beyond Photography

I recently came across an advertisement on Facebook for a DJ looking to gain wedding clients. The title said “Cheap DJ” and went on to state how this person used to be in a band and his friend gave him the idea to use his sound system to provide an affordable DJ service to the area, because all the other companies were overpriced. He stated that he could only offer a basic service, but guaranteed that he would be the cheapest in town. It was honestly a terrible sales pitch. It provided no value other than his promise to be cheap. Would you feel comfortable with this DJ at your wedding? Not surprisingly, not a single person was interested in his service even though he promised to beat everyone else on price. The reason I bring this up is because this sounds too much like many of the photography businesses I see pop up each year. Sometimes, it can be helpful to see something absurd in an outside industry to accurately reflect on what we are doing in our own.

The lesson here is that while every consumer does care about price to some extent, it is not all they care about. Clients care about the value they are getting for a service and then use pricing to determine if the offer is worth the cost. Photographers trying to grow a business tend to offer a low-value item for an even lower price and then are surprised when no one books them. If you separate clients into different pools based on what they are looking for, no one wants no value for a small cost. Several people want some value at a low cost. There are even more who want a lot of value for a fair cost. Finally, more consumers than you think want a high value enough that they will pay a high cost to get it. So, what pool are you using to find your clients? Are you fishing in a pond that has a minimal amount of fish and lots of fisherman? This is the peril of competing only on price.

Why Lowering Price Doesn’t Usually Work

This issue isn’t unique to photography. Check out any service industry in your area. There is always going to be someone who doesn’t know how to market themselves, so they turn to reduced pricing. They see this method work for larger stores like Wal-Mart, who offers budget pricing and constant discounts that bring them a lot of success. The problem is, Wal-Mart can sell a low-profit item thousands of times. A local service business can’t. When people don’t know how to market themselves, they assume that all people care about is price and they begin to shout that they are the cheapest around.

I have a friend in a service industry who started a business a few years ago. He recently found out that a competing company was 30 percent cheaper, but also offered a lesser service. His first instinct was to lower his prices to undercut the other business and gain more clients. This, of course, left him the option of having no profit for his work or to lower his quality to cut cost. And if they would have done so, I’m sure the other company would have undercut them in return. This is the definition of being in a race to the bottom. Instead of offering a quality service for a fair price, they were tempted to provide an inferior service at a reduced cost to compete, a move that I believe would have eventually put them out of business. Thankfully he changed his mind after seeing this strategy for what it was. So how do you relate all of this to your photography business?

How to Compete in Business

One way to develop a business strategy is to decide what you will do with the three essential elements of business: customer service, quality, and pricing. However, one revelation that you need to have is that most companies cannot compete in all three areas. The majority of successful ones only choose to focus on two.

Let’s stick with Wal-Mart as an example. When you think of Wal-Mart, you think about fast lines, employees helping in each department, guarantees on broken items, and overall cheap pricing. If you want to purchase a luxury item, however, this is the wrong store for you. Wal-Mart can beat their competition by offering the best possible price combined with excellent customer service. Quality is not their priority. Apple, on the other hand, is all about quality and service, not pricing. Additionally, you can probably think of several local small businesses, especially photographers, who don’t respond to emails and take too long to deliver products. These companies probably have good quality and competitive pricing, but terrible customer service.

So, what does this mean for you? My argument is that if the theory about only competing with two of these business elements is correct and every other photographer is competing on price, then you should ditch that race altogether and find a new way to compete. This means starting over and developing a business strategy entirely around excellent quality and top-notch customer service. You don’t have to be the highest-priced photographer around. Instead, figure out how much you need to make, set your prices, and learn to compete in the other two areas of business. Hopefully, you will find that you have left the arena that everyone else is looking for clients in and are one of the few fishermen in an entirely different pond.

Levi Keplar's picture

Levi Keplar is a wedding and portrait photographer and educator. He currently owns and operates his studio, Katie & Levi Photography, with his wife and is based in the Wichita, Kansas area. He has a passion for both the technical and the business sides of photography and helping others to grow in those areas as well.

Log in or register to post comments
7 Comments

I am a doc by trade and in my field it is constant flux with insurances changing how and what they pay for. In my area there is a trend towards “working with people” to offset what insurance doesn’t cover. We routinely are asked to reduce or wave fees. We have held the line and said no for 10 years now. Yes we lost a number of patients who were price shopping. Many returned some didn’t. However, my community knows that I offer but quality and service for a higher price. People who call my office know this and we are at capacity plus %20 daily. While I do live in a small microcosm, I have a significant mnumber of pt’s that travel multiple hours each way to see me and pass many other providers along that that offer less quality for less $. When clients leave over then will end up with inferior quality and service some will be ok with this and not return, others will realize the additional costs you change are nothing when they figure out how much the quality and service has saved them. So hold the line as long as your product truely matches you fees. Just my humble opinion from an industry outsider

I love hearing the perspective from an outside industry. I imagine people think all doctors are equal like people think all photographers are equal. Thanks for sharing your story!

Back to old barter system! In fairness, back before laws prohibited this type of stuff in my field I did get a side of beef as payment on outstanding bill from a patient that had a cattle ranch. However, $110 worth of socks I think would be equal to an artist with an iPhone and 3 or 4 jpegs. That’s not enough to cover 30 mins of work. That would barley cover petrol to the location. They must think very highly of their socks. Lol

For many years I have mentored people starting businesses and I always tell them the same thing. “Find a hole and fill the hole” if the hole you are in becomes a dead end get a new hole. Crappy product always loses may take time but it will turn around in the meantime find a different hole that has clients that value your work. You can’t complete on a downhill run to the floor. Everyone loses.

A long time ago we used to deal with injury cases that were going to be litigated. Always at the end the attorney would ask for us to cut our bill. We always responded by saying “sure as soon as you provide with documentation that you reduced yours” we always got our bills paid. May could respond to a director with a similar scenario. Sadly though many people only look at balance sheets until they have to explain why at the end of the year they have not hit their target growth projections.

Best of luck their is no right answer only the continued fight. Just don’t sell yourself short because other sell themselves short.

Cheers

What about the photographers who have no real clue as to the value of the images they create?

There are photogs who do a great job and do a ton of retouching, eat the costs of billable items and don't even know what to charge for a fee let alone usage?

I have been at this a long time, when I started I worked for 3 or for different photographers and large studios for about 5 years before going on my own. I saw invoices for ad agency jobs I saw that photogs maked up everything to cover the CODB. For example I charged $150 per day as an assistant, he billed client $225. A sheet of film that cost $7 was billed at $12.
I see young, and when I say young I mean 25-33 year olds, who never assisted, never saw the inner workings of the business side. They learned everything from some workshops and the "HiGuys!" on you tube telling them all the secrets of how to shoot this or that. Things that when I worked for people I was sworn to secrecy because these were the things that made that photog different from his/her competition. Now everything is shared online.

I was talking with a client and he said I lost a $15,000 job that we had done 4 times in the past to a very competent 30 year old gal who was charging $6000. And doing all retouching for $0 So now that job is worth $6000 until she realizes that there's no profit at that number...

Very true, I had the same problem last year, now what I have done is, I have make 3 Different Price, in 3 different time of Day, because in my Country is different than in USA, we do mostly Photoshooting approx, 3H Max, not often we charge for 12 or 15 Hours. I Did like this, maybe it will be helpful for someone here, for example: from 09:00-12:00 is 600$, 13:00-16:00 500$ because is very hot in this Time, 17:00-20:00 is 700$, this kind of charging was very very great and successful for me! I know for someone here it sound Weird, but in my Country, I`m very successful with this kind of charging!