Critique the Community
Clever
Submit Your Most "Clever" Image
Congratulations to the winners!
Thanks to everyone for entering their best images that represent the "clever" theme. As you can see from the video, the contest winners didn't quite go as planned but out of fairness for everyone else who followed the rules, we think it's the right thing to do.
If you want to enter your images into the next Critique the Community, you can submit your best "unusually lighting" photos on the next contest page. You have until July 30th at 12:30 eastern time to submit up to 2 images for the Critique. We hope to see some interesting images with some unique lighting and wish everyone the best.
Rules & Prizes
For this critique, we don't just want to see a great photo, we want to see a clever concept.
Images will still be rated on overall quality but only clever images, with unique ideas, will make it into the critique video.
Make sure that you write a quick summary in the description of how you came up with the idea and how you created the photograph.
Each photographer can submit up to three images. If anyone complains about the rating system their images will not be chosen.
Featured image by Rui Bandeira
Wed, 07/14/2021 - 14:00
This contest has ended.
36 people have cast a total of 333 votes on 87 entries from 59 participants
Contest Submissions
Click on the thumbnails below to comment and rate each image.
Click here to learn about the Fstoppers rating system and what each star value means.
20 Comments
How do I view the results without having to wade through a 56 minute video? The link takes me nowhere.
--- "If anyone complains about the rating system their images will not be chosen."
YEESSSS! :D
Dang, too bad about half of the submission never got votes because the voting closed prematurely.
So since I don't submit images and stopped watching these videos years ago............I can complain. The system is (insert your own words)
Looking at the previous contests, they don't necessarily pick the highest rated for their Youtube thumbs.
This slot was always about the ego of two wannabe presenters rather than the content.