Is It Too Late To Get Into Film? It Depends on What You’re Looking For

There are more and more people by the day looking to get into film. And why not, right? Depending on what you’re looking for, it may be too late.

I don’t know that there’s a single photographer who is cued into the photography community who wouldn’t agree that film photography is reaching new heights of popularity that haven’t been seen since before the rise of digital cameras. The difference between then and now is that back in the late ’90s when film was still king, film cameras were made new and were in no short supply. Dozens of manufacturers had multiple models ranging from point and shoots to autofocus SLRs. Indeed, even medium format cameras were still made new. Nowadays, these cameras from the former film dynasty are aging more and more, and those with digital interfaces are becoming less and less reliable in addition to them getting harder and harder to fix. This tailspin that we are in has got to a point that the only expensive “modern” camera I owned, the Fuji GA645, was sold in fear of the day it gave out it while in my possession and that I wouldn’t get my money back for it. 

To those asking if it's too late to get into the film, I would say that, of course, it isn’t if it’s something you really want to pursue. Perhaps, though, film is something that you’d like to get but aren't quite sure yet if you would like it or whether you would like it enough to warrant the cost of the camera, film, and development. In fact, the cost of getting into film is the primary deterrent for most people at this point. So, if you’re undecided, let’s get into whether or not it’s worthwhile at this point for you. 

Getting Into Film

Let’s say that you’re just now wanting to get into film. Let’s say that you’ve made it to 2021 to see the popularity of film blow up in recent years and how film has made its way into the Instagram accounts of some of the most popular photographers of the day. Perhaps you’ve been spurred on by friends that you know that have gotten into film and loved it. I mean, let’s face it: no one these days gets into film and doesn’t enjoy it to some extent! Regardless of the reason you want to get into film, it’s perfectly fun and supplements digital photography perfectly if for no other reason than that it teaches you to stop and appreciate each and every shot. 

With all of that said, the question for many new photographers looking to get in the game is simple: “is it too late to get into film photography?” This is a perfectly valid question for a number of reasons, the most important of which is simply the cost. The fact of the matter is that in just the last couple of years, prices for cameras have skyrocketed far beyond what I would have ever thought. Take, for example, two and a half years ago, I bought my full Mamiya Pro-TL kit with a 55mm f/2.8, autowinder, and manual winder, with a back for $300 and tax. And truthfully, I thought that I was paying such top dollar at the time, I nearly didn’t buy it. During the holidays of 2019, a buddy’s wife bought my buddy a full Mamiya RB67 kit with the waist level finder and prism, both, for $320. I wouldn’t even dream of seeing either of those today for those prices. 

What Are Your Expectations?

What happens when money is less of an issue, but you have high expectations for the gear itself. Perhaps you want something with modern amenities like autofocus and/or aperture priority mode. For some people, they want the experience of the film but they still want a high-quality image or at least something more high quality than what you’ll get from higher grain film on 35mm. For those individuals, medium format and/or large format would be required. Gone are the days that you can get a Mamiya RB67 kit for less than $300 any day of the week and at any shop that sold film camera gear. So, if someone still wanted to spend less than $300 for a whole kit, they may need to move down to 645 or even 35mm and in lesser popular systems. As a matter a fact, $300 can still get most older, manual 35mm cameras and a lens. Once you move into medium format, however, $300 doesn’t go very far anymore. Indeed, $300 may not even get you a medium format camera kit that is in good shape unless you really luck out and stumble into something great on Facebook marketplace or an antique shop or something where the seller doesn't know the value of what they have. 

So, with prices for cameras going up and up, is it about the time to buy your first camera, or has that time passed? I would argue that it depends on what you’re looking for. In brief, if you’re open-minded about what you get and/or are willing to spend a decent amount of money, you can surely find something. As is typical with the used market, supply is typically limited in quantity and variety. As such, your expectations of what to get will dictate much of the success you have in finding a camera that meets your needs at a price you’re willing to pay. Last week, I put together a list of cameras that I thought were the most overrated and underrated cameras at the time (you can find it here). As much as I hate doing it, I felt that I had to move the Mamiya 645 Pro(-TL) from the underrated section to the overrated section due to how outrageous the cost of a good kit has become. In all honesty, if I was getting into medium format now, there is no way I would even look at the Mamiya, and instead, I would likely go with a Zenza Bronica camera. 

It’s About Time

Now that I’ve said all this, if you’re still thinking it’s time for you to get a camera, I would say you should probably go for it sooner rather than later. If there’s anything that you should be picking up from this article, it’s that the prices of cameras are not getting any cheaper, at least not in the near future. So, the next time you see the camera you’re considering buying, you should probably jump on it. If you’re still unsure because things are too expensive, it’s probably too late for what you were thinking of. Instead, perhaps consider broadening your search to encompass other film formats and cameras. 

Log in or register to post comments

12 Comments

Ed C's picture

I take it there isn't much of an editorial process at Fstoppers ... https://fstoppers.com/film/film-photography-crossroads-headed-extinction...

Greg Wilson's picture

Just the right time if doing it for fun. As for the looks - all the major film stocks are digitise by RNI and available as profiles, so not too much sense.

Carlos Dacosta's picture

If you think you can buy a good film camera and lens for $300, good luck!. There is a lot of junk lenses out there that have either mould, haziness, scratches or are broken and as for bodies, beware as many are not adjusted properly or are in need of repair. Thats what you get for $300 or less.

Johnny Kiev's picture

I recently bought an OM2, 3 lenses, bag and filters for £10, with the exception of my Contax G1 and a brace of 4x5 cameras I have never paid more than £50 for a film camera, all working in perfectly usable condition.
And it isn't that I happen to live in a film camera Nirvana, over the past few years I have lived in Russia, France, and the UK, and bought many cameras in each, too many probably as I have well in excess of 100 now.
I'm either very lucky indeed, which I doubt, or just search in the correct way, charity/thrift shops are a good source, as are local adverts.
I avoid eBay and the like.
For someone starting out former Soviet kit can be a good and cheap way, I bought the camera below as New Old Stock in a Manchester store for the ridiculous sum of £2, works perfectly, the picture below it is from the first test roll I shot with it, not cleaned up and expired film hence the word colour and dust, but no issues with the operation o the camera.

Marc F's picture

I am into film since about 1970 and never went digital. I don’t like cheap digital toys and have no money to buy a digital Hasselblad or other expensive gear that will lose all their value later. I once bought a 10 megapixels Kodak on sale for $99 and now I can see them sold in thrift stores for $2.99. But my 205TCC Hassy I bought 30 years ago is still like new and keeps it’s value. And I have the freezer full of infrared films up to 4”x5”sheet films, and some color IR Ektachrome, outdated but still good. And until now there are still no digital cameras with color infrared sensor. Where is the progress?

Alexander Petrenko's picture

Many things happened in cameras world since 10 megapixel Kodaks that cost $99...

Marc F's picture

I agree. Too many things happens now but it’s for this reason that cameras that are unaffordable today will be sold for almost nothing in garage sales and thrift stores 10 years later… like my 10 megapixel Kodak. Unfortunately I can’t afford to buy $$$$$ cameras every 10 years.

Alexander Petrenko's picture

What was the price of 205TCC 30 years ago?

Marc F's picture

I don’t remember the exact price as I bought it in Hong Kong with the 80mm, the 150mm, another back, the prism viewer, the Hasselblad pro-flash and some accessories, but it seems that the current value for a mint one is higher than what I then paid for the new one.

Alexander Petrenko's picture

You need to divide current price by 2.95 to adjust for time value of money.

AJ L's picture

I love film shooting. I stopped doing it years ago. It’s just too expensive now. Kodak Gold is $5/roll. Portra is over $10. A roll of E100 chrome film with a processing mailer is $30! And that’s just for 35mm. Then, good luck finding decent processing locally. At least Dwayne’s still has pretty reasonable prices.

Alexander Petrenko's picture

Two best investments for those willing to start shooting film in 2021:

- DSLR with broken LCD
- 1 GB memory card