No camera is perfect, but for me, the Sony a9 III is pretty close. Unfortunately, there is one problem that's holding this camera back.
It’s been over a year since the Sony a9 III made its groundbreaking debut as the first full frame global shutter camera. This innovative technology created waves in the photography world, offering capabilities that many professionals had only dreamed of. I’ve been using the a9 III since the day it was announced, and it has certainly lived up to the hype. In fact, I think this camera will be a definitive marker in camera technology history. However, after extensive use, there is one problem that not a lot of people are talking about—more specifically, the need for an adjustable flash timing and the effect that adjustment has in real-world flash use.
What Is a Global Shutter and Why Does It Matter?
Before we get to the issue at hand, let’s establish what makes the global shutter in the Sony a9 III revolutionary. Unlike traditional rolling shutters that capture an image by scanning the sensor from top to bottom, a global shutter captures the entire frame at once. This eliminates issues like rolling shutter distortion in fast-moving scenes or when panning. It’s a game-changer for sports, action, and wedding photographers who require precision and speed.
The a9 III’s global shutter brings another major advantage: the ability to sync flash at incredibly high shutter speeds, theoretically unlocking new creative potential. However, the technology isn’t without its hurdles, especially when working with flash.
Flash Timing: The Achilles' Heel of the Global Shutter
One of the most significant challenges I’ve encountered with the global shutter is flash timing. This issue arises when trying to synchronize flash output with the camera’s high shutter speeds—speeds far beyond traditional sync limits like 1/250 of a second.
Here’s where things get complicated: the process of finding the correct flash timing for a specific shutter speed and flash power setting is neither intuitive nor consistent. Adjusting the flash timing requires a meticulous process of trial and error, which can be tedious, especially under the time constraints of a professional shoot.
Comparing Traditional Sync With Global Shutter Sync
With traditional flash sync speeds, the workflow is straightforward. I set my camera settings—ISO, shutter speed, and aperture—for the ambient light. Then, I turn on the flash, set a general power level, and take a test shot. If the flash is too bright, I turn the power down; if it’s too dim, I turn it up. Simple and efficient.
With the global shutter, things remain just as simple as when working with traditional sync so long as you are at a 1/500 shutter speed or slower. But once you get to faster shutter speeds, things get a bit more complicated. You still do the same starting steps of getting your ambient exposure set, then getting your flash turned on to a starting power, and taking a test image. But before you can decide if the flash power is what you want, you first have to find the correct flash timing.
The way this works is you take a test image, then adjust the flash timing and take another test image. You then have to manually compare the two test images to see if the brightness of the flash has gone up or down. If the flash brightness has gone up, you adjust the flash timing, take another test image, and compare. You continue this process until you notice the flash power go down in brightness. At this point, you know that one adjustment back on the flash timing is the correct setting. Only then can you decide if the flash is too bright or not bright enough. If you need to make an adjustment, then you have to restart the entire timing adjustment, test image, and comparison process.
If at this point you are wondering if global shutter sync is more efficient than traditional sync and high-speed sync, you can see a comparison in the video below.
The Role of the Flash Curve
To understand the challenge fully, it’s essential to grasp the concept of a flash curve. When a flash fires, it doesn’t instantly reach peak brightness and then turn off; instead, its light output follows a curve. The duration and shape of this curve vary based on the flash’s power setting. Traditional flash systems are optimized for sync speeds like 1/250 of a second, where the entire flash curve fits comfortably within the exposure.
With the global shutter’s ability to sync at ultra-high speeds—up to 1/80,000 of a second—the exposure only captures a tiny slice of the flash curve. This is why the flash timing must be adjusted so precisely; the goal is to align the shutter with the peak brightness of the flash curve.
The Flash Power Dilemma
Here’s where the problem becomes even more complex: when working with such brief slices of the flash curve, adjusting the flash power doesn’t always produce the expected results. At ultra-high shutter speeds, different power settings can yield nearly identical exposures because the captured slice contains the same peak brightness. This undermines one of the primary ways photographers traditionally control flash output.
As a result, I’ve had to rely on alternative methods to adjust light levels, such as changing the distance between the flash and the subject, using ND filters for the flash, or adjusting the camera’s aperture and ISO. These workarounds can be effective but add complexity to the shooting process.
The Challenges of Multi-Light Setups
The difficulties don’t end with single-flash setups. Multi-light configurations become significantly more challenging when using the global shutter at higher shutter speeds. For example, if you are at a shutter speed of 1/80,000 and have a full-power main light and a quarter-power rim light, the flash output could actually be the exact same. And we can see that in practice. The images below were taken at 1/80,000, ISO 250, and f/1.8. The only difference is that one was taken at full power and the other was taken at 1/16th power.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bedc/3bedc729143f1aa759ea82a98bbff457562eb1c6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/505a8/505a85ae58f8599cfc5a9ce36f178f1fe45de47b" alt=""
Even though there is a very drastic difference in the flash output, the amount of light captured by the extremely fast shutter speed still gathers about the same amount of light. To add more trouble to the issue, if you have multiple lights and simply drop the power of one light far enough to access a different flash curve, you will end up not being able to see any light from that flash at all. This is because you can only have the flash timing set to capture a single curve peak.
Seeking Solutions: Charts and Future Innovations
To streamline the process, I’ve created a reference chart for my Godox AD200 Pro II that outlines the correct flash timing settings for various combinations of shutter speed and power. While this has saved time in the field, it’s a temporary fix rather than a comprehensive solution. The underlying issue remains: current flashes aren’t optimized for the demands of global shutter technology when you start to venture into higher shutter speeds.
Some flashes, like those from Sony and the newly announced Godox V100 Pro, already feature automatic flash timing adjustments. However, these advancements only address part of the problem. Ideally, we need a flash that has consistent flash timing for all power levels, as well as flash power controlled by peak power rather than peak power in combination with flash duration.
Conclusion
The Sony a9 III’s global shutter represents a monumental leap forward in camera technology, opening doors to creative possibilities previously unattainable. In all honesty, the issues at hand are not the fault of the camera itself but simply a consequence of this new technology pushing past the boundaries of what has ever been possible. We simply need flash manufacturers to catch up with this leap forward in innovation. So don’t get things confused and think that this tech is not worth the hassle. The camera works like any other camera when using shutter speeds of 1/500 or slower, which is already faster than any other mirrorless camera (aside from cameras using a leaf shutter). Also, some of these issues are not as drastic when shooting at higher shutter speeds just outside the 1/500 shutter speed. They just become more and more apparent as the shutter speed goes higher, being most noticeable at the max shutter speed of 1/80,000. But even with these pain points, the Sony a9 III is still hands down the best camera I have ever used for off-camera flash work. We just need the rest of the industry to catch up.
Hi Jason! Check out the Hassleblad with their leaf shutter lenses for off-camera flash work. The effective shutter speed is usually around 1/1500-1/2500 without HSS, but you also get DRAMATICALLY better IQ than you do from an a9 III. Expensive but I love it.
Ya I've had my eye on the newer setups from Hasselblad. I'd love to check one out. For my regular work, I definitely want fast and reliable AF and AF tracking. I'm curious if an X2D could keep up.
I highly doubt the AF reliability and tracking is anywhere near your Sony's, especially the a9. I have the same bodies as you.
Any supposed IQ advantage is only good while pixelpeeping raw files. Exported jpgs are no better than any camera in the last 13+ years. DPReview has some jpgs to view and raws you can play with, https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/6142952057/hasselblad-x2d-100c... . Their jpgs are indiscernible from my Sony NEX-5N in 2012.
With that said, you should write about it for your use case. The kit (body + 2 lenses) are only $455 to rent for the weekend. https://www.lensrentals.com/rent/hasselblad-x2d-100c-lightweight-portrai...
Leaf shutters are an advantage of fixed-lens compacts and super-zooms that’s often overlooked. I bought an FZ1000 for this reason specifically to do lit family portraits outdoors without HSS.
Jason, I was familiar with the tradeoff between fast shutter sync and flash duration, but had not grasped the implications for global shutter sync. Thanks for putting this puzzle together for us with a well-written explanation.
Glad it was useful!! 🤗 🤗
I said it in the yt comments and I’ll say it here; anything beyond x sync is a bonus, not a problem, even if there’s caveats
This has always been a problem, as a long term leaf shutter user, i have always had to have an eye on flash duration. On the Phase One XF it has a flash analysis, so you can see how the flash is syncing and distributing relative to the shutter opening. Broncolor have always been best for for flash duration. I can see there will be some improvement to flash duration, but i can't see it improving by much
Exactly, only HS with Broncolor allows any camera and lower ISO than the a9III. Lights choice has always been more important to me than the camera itself. Many people have argued with me about lights, but clearly the a9III makes it clear that light quality is very important. And by the way, I am referring specifically to the Siros that actually got a real bad review here a few month ago because they were in fact not really tested.
I have mentioned this exact situation the day they announced that camera despite never having touched to this day. True Hyper Sync, not HHS does exactly the same, only it's been around for a long time, just not popular because it doesn't offer TTL. The only difference is the possible banding from HS but Broncolor lights have huge accuracy in that mode and if it happens from time to time it is very minimal.
The issue is that hyper sync requires longer flash duration or shorter shutter speeds to work on order to make sure the flash covers the entire sensor as the shutter slit travels. With global shutter, you can capture short and long flash durations no matter the shutter speed because there is no shutter slit (not sure on the technical term for this?).
Correct. I am not saying the process is identical, but you can achieve the same results from the same potential output your strobe will have, minus the slit, which again is very well controlled with Broncolor. At the same time You have to have a global shutter camera with potentially higher minimum ISO, while HS is good to go if your camera brand is covered by your HS compatible light brand. Both have a slight advantage to consider if you run a business otherwise either is just a good toy to have.
We used to shoot sports and birds with film cameras. I shot great sports and action stuff with my Nikon D850 which was a DSLR. I even shot sports in manual focus no problems. My argument is good photographers can make any gear work in any situation this was a total gimmick to suck people in and if you fell for it all I can say is you've probably never shot with a film camera.!! There is way too much excuse the pun focus on technological advancements to get better photos and what it's doing is reducing the skill level and skill development of photographers. If the gear does everything for you. Then there is no skill in the hobby if there is no skill in the profession. I don't want to do it. I'd get bored with it if I know it every shot is in focus. There is no fun in that for me and yep that's me and I'm different and I make no apologies for that. I think the advancements in gear was always going to happen but it has significantly devalued the work we do because pretty much anyone could pick up a camera put it in subject detection mode and press the button and wow, I'm a photographer....... And to me that's really sad
There's a big difference between getting the shots you want vs settling with the shots you got. I guarantee, your sports and action photos, especially in film or in manual focus was the latter.
--- "My argument is good photographers can make any gear work in any situation"
While that's true to a certain point, like working with what you currently have, smart and proper photographers will get the gear they need to make their job easier and more efficient. Not to mention to get the shots they or their clients want.
It's sad that some people think just because they did it the hard way, they did it the right way. Even going as far as making excuses for their systems' bad AF, "I'd get bored with it if I know it every shot is in focus". Lol smh
This is not the same skill this article is covering. The process of elimination here is much more complex. Most people are not or have not been exposed to this level of limitations in photography because the level of precision of light output and flash duration is not what most people are typically concerned with.
Your comment has nothing to do with the topic of the article... But advancements in technology only help great photographers create easier. I think it's funny when people argue that gear doesn't matter, but I doubt there is a single dslr on the sidelines of any professional sports event right now. Gear doesn't matter for the act of learning the craft. But gear does matter 🤗