Canon Announces the EOS-1D X Mark II: 20MP, 4K60p Video, ISO 409,600, and CFast 2.0

Just behind Nikon's announcement of the D5, Canon comes with their own anxiously-awaited update to their flagship DSLR: the new EOS-1D X Mark II. Building on the experience of both the 1D X and the 1D C, the 1D X Mark II features a modest increase in resolution to 20 megapixels, instead counting its improvements mostly in the areas of image quality, autofocus, and speed.

Of note, native ISO performance of the 1D X Mark II stays the same at ISO 100-51,200 while its expanded range increases one stop to 409,600. For those that may have wished for more, you have plenty to be pleased about within other areas of performance. And there's still room for wishfully thinking that Canon is taking this body's release as a way to more accurately state its ISO performance in relation to its signal-to-noise ratio in relation to that of other manufacturers. Here's to hoping.

On another note, the Mark II features new, dual Digic 6+ processors that allow for processing 14 raw or JPEG frames per second (and up to 16 in Live View). Helping these high frame rates is a shutter with carbon fiber blades that is built to withstand 400,000 exposures.

These processors can also churn out 4K video clips at 60 frames per second for, get this, as long as it takes to fill up your card, no clip-stitching necessary. Canon does this thanks to the CFast 2.0 card slot in the Mark II (the other is a traditional CF card slot). Because of the exFAT file system used by CFast 2.0 and the high speeds at which it can record, there's no need to split up clips or stop recording at any point, even when shooting at full 4K resolutions and 60 frames per second or at 120 frames per second in 1080p. Shooting at full speed, the buffer will allow recording of up to 170 raw frames on CFast 2.0 cards or 73 frames to CF cards. (Update: Unfortunately, according to the video just added, it seems that all 4K recording from this body comes directly from the center pixels of the sensor, meaning you won't get the full angle of view you're used to getting from your lenses. While this is common in various cameras -- especially DSLRs with video -- some may have expected 4K down-sampled from the full frame.)

Canon also promises continuous autofocus while shooting stills and video, regardless of the frame rate, thanks to its dual-pixel CMOS AF and Movie Servo AF. A 360,000-pixel metering sensor helps with subject recognition and tracking across the 61-point High Density Reticular AF II system with 41 cross-type points that give improved center point focusing sensitivity to -3 EV and compatibility down to f/8.

One feature likely to be undervalued is Canon's new in-camera Digital Lens Optimizer technology that allows for in-body lens aberration and diffraction correction for every shot, naturally saving one more step in post.

Naturally, the 1D X Mark II is weather sealed, even at its connection points, as is the available WFT-E8A wireless transmitter. As an added bonus, GPS functionality is built-in, including an awesome auto time-syncing feature that syncs with Universal Time Code via satellites.

It's hard to compete with numbers above 3 million when it comes to ISO. But given further refinements in the body design (helped by a rear touchscreen), virtually unlimited video recording capabilities, continuous accurate autofocus in every scenario, the addition of a card slot that offers faster media, and ever-increasing frame rates, the 1D X Mark II should easily become the Canon pros' tool of choice.

Canon shooters, what do you think? Worth your money? Everything you'd hoped? Let us know!

The EOS-1D X Mark II will be available for $5,999 and will ship in April. Pre-order yours here.

Adam Ottke's picture

Adam works mostly across California on all things photography and art. He can be found at the best local coffee shops, at home scanning film in for hours, or out and about shooting his next assignment. Want to talk about gear? Want to work on a project together? Have an idea for Fstoppers? Get in touch! And, check out FilmObjektiv.org film rentals!

Log in or register to post comments
62 Comments
Previous comments

C-LOG? Is it 8 bits or 10 bits for 4K. Is it 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 for 4K? How about 1080p? 10 bits? What's the bit depth over HDMI? Uncompressed HDMI out? What's the dynamic range?

On paper it looks really nice ! And unlike nikon it will have great colors out of the box :)

How can you say it has better colors?

Just a personal experience-opinion based on the files that I get from second shooters. There are only a handful shooters that shoot nikon, that I can say I like their colors and know how to do it.The cameras are great, no question on that, but I m having trouble getting the look I like out of the files, nothing personal here guys, personal taste, and please do not beat me on that :)

Canon 1 series just does that better out of the box.

I think it could easily be argued that this is an Adobe thing, too. I mean, I have to say...for a while I was processing everything through Capture NX software to convert to DNGs that had the same color Nikon shows on the back of the LCD (which is friggin' awesome in my opinion). But that just became too annoying, so I just deal with it now. But I think the profiles Adobe has for Nikon could certainly be improved. Even C1 processing is better...but still...

thank god a camera can now shoot at 409K iso. i'm so tired of having to shoot during the day all the time.

;D

It's nowhere near as good as d5's 3m iso. Now we can shoot everything in moonlight. Flash market is taking a big hit! ;)

Why am I not that excited with the announcment of this camera? Canon had 5 years to develop a replacement/upgrade for the 1Dx but it was more of a "refresh" IMHO.
Since both cameras (Nikon D5 & Canon 1DX Mark II) are not out yet, the only way I can compare it is by paper.

http://petapixel.com/2016/02/02/how-the-canon-1d-x-mark-ii-and-nikon-d5-...

After reading it, I am looking at Nikon lead this battle. The biggest concern for many is the 4K video length where Nikon really did fail (for videographers). But other than that, Canon was a bit behind. Nikon's 12FPS vs Canon's 14FPS is not much of a deal now. And for sure, it'll be a let down again on Canon's side when it comes to ISO performance and dynamic range. The buffer is also lacking. And with some concern I saw online was the combination of CF and CFast slot might cause a user to mistakenly insert a card on the wrong slot.
The camera body also looks weird with that "box" shape corner.
It'a not that bad. It is still an impressive camera but was just surprised that Canon didn't stepped up their game on it.

(Some might accuse me that I'm a Nikon fan. I do use Nikon D810 as my personal camera. But Our publication gives us Canon 5D mk3 and 1Dx. So I use both brands professionaly.)

I am reading otherwise. It shows Canon just knows the photo business really well.

Video:
This camera aims at reportage type of photography be it NG research, photo journalism, (x)sports etc. video footage is becoming almost like a necessity in these fields. This camera is ideal for small to one man shooter jobs. Sometimes one camera will just be able to do both well. Canon crushed Nikon in video department.

Focus Points:
For wildlife Canon has all selectable focus points at f8 while Nikon has limited options when those telephoto lenses are pairedwith tele converters. It may be a deal breaker for many wildlife shooters.

Buffer:
Nikon has more buffer in paper but fine-print shows it couldn't handled as many shots as canon when uncompressed raw option is selected.

DR:
I do however expect Nikon to have better DR but it remains to see how much a difference there is.

Resolution:
It's disappointing that Canon didn't go for 22mp or 24MP for the extra bit of detail here. I much rather it has more MP than faster frame rate since 1DX already offers 12fps, plenty sufficient for 95% use.

cool