The Fujinon 200mm f/2 From the Point of View of a Portrait Photographer

The Fujinon 200mm f/2 From the Point of View of a Portrait Photographer

The Fujinon 200mm f/2.0 is a beast of a lens designed mostly for sports and wildlife, but as a portrait shooter I wanted to see how it stacked up. 

Before I dig into anything specific let's start with the specs of this lens. The (deep breath now) Fujinon XF 200mm f/2 R LM OIS WR kens, AKA the Fuji 200mm, weighs in at a whopping 5lbs, and a front element that is 105mm in diameter this is a serious piece of kit.

Look and Feel

The Fuji 200mm feels hefty and solid. It feels like it can take a few hits and keep on ticking. Not that I would recommend treating the lens carelessly, it's $6,000 after all. The lens however does have some weather sealing, hence the WR in the name, so users don't have to worry about taking the lens out on a rainy day and worry about it being ruined. 

Along with weather resistance, the lens also has Optical Image Stabilization which is next to mandatory when shooting handheld with a lens this long and heavy, thankfully Fuji has graced us with five stops of stabilization meaning that even with my caffeine addled hands I can reasonably frame a shot even from across the room. The OIS is actually pretty magical — Fuji doesn't make a lot of lenses with image stabilization and I wish they would, though it does add some size to the camera I can think of a few lenses that could really benefit like the 23mm f2.

The lens is made entirely of metal, covered in a pearl like off-white finish which matches the plastic lens hood. The lens hood attaches by a screw on the side which allows you to really feel secure that it won't fall off accidentally compared to the twist-on bayonet mount other, lighter, lens hoods use.  As with other lenses this heavy there is a tripod collar so that you can mount the lens to your tripod rather than your camera in order to save your poor lens mount from needing to carry five pounds way out in front of it. Two nice touches of this tripod foot show just the amount of care that Fujifilm put into this lens. The first is that the tripod collar rotates with soft clicks every ninety degrees so you know exactly when your camera is level, the second nice touch is that the base is compatible with arca-swiss style tripods, no extra base plate needed!

On the front of the lens are four buttons, which are all designed to do the same thing depending on what you set them to, allowing you to have easy access to them no matter which orientation the lens is in. The buttons are set to different auto focus modes depending on the switch on the side. allowing you to switch between AF-L and lock focus at any position, AF-ON ensuring you can comfortably back-button focus, or set a custom focus preset so you can hit one of the buttons and automatically go straight to a preset position. The AF I found quiet, fast, but it would hunt a little bit when focusing in the studio which makes sense because in studio you are on the close-end of the focus range. Overall the autofocus is just find but, speaking of the studio...

In Studio

A photo shot with the 200mm F/2, backlit with a flash
The Fuji 200mm f/2.0 is not exactly designed for in-studio portraits, especially at home. But the images it gives are gorgeous. Are they worth $6,000 though? Let's see. 

As you can observe in the image above, the lens handles backlighting beautifully with almost no flare or halo to be seen. The lens is tack sharp which you can see in the image below, zoomed in 400%. The one drawback to the lens is just how far from your subject you have to get in order to get a headshot framed photo.

Along with how far you must be from the subject, the image gains aren't really all that much. Below are two images, one is shot with the 200mm f/2.0 and the other with the Fuji 90mm f/2.0 - can you guess which is which?

Overall the lens is absolutely gorgeous but if you are in a small home-studio, like me, it doesn't;t really shine as much as I wish it did.

On Location

Outdoors is where I found this lens really shines. The compression it gives is much more noticeable than in the studio, and allows your background to fall away into creamy, blurry, bokeh goodness. When you have your subject from head to toe, the 300mm equivalent lens gives you a unique look you can't really get with any other lens in the Fuji system. 

A full-bodied portrait of Toronto rapper Exmiranda
Yes, you need to be at shouting distance to be able to get these sorts of full bodied portraits, but the special look they give is totally worth it in my opinion, it makes everything around your subject look larger than life allowing you to turn any location into something special. 

One thing to keep in mind with this lens is that it allows the photographer to totally blur out any distractions while still getting full body or portrait shots. The lens is just as sharp outside as it is inside because, well, physics don't change.

What I Liked

  • The build quality
  • Sharpness
  • Overall "look" when used outdoors

What I Didn't Like

  • The price
  • In studio the lens isn't anything special
  • Autofocus can hunt sometimes when trying to focus close


In conclusion, the Fuji 200mm f/2,0 is not a lens for everyone or every use. If you're mostly a studio shooter, like myself, I'd say stick with the 90mm or maybe the 50-140 f/2.8 if you really want that extra reach. However if you are an outdoor shooter, maybe shooting family portraits or athletes in posed scenarios, this lens may just be a perfect addition to your kit which just goes to show that just because something is designed for wildlife or sports doesn't mean it has to be used that way. Have you gotten a chance to use the Fuji 200mm or any other super long lens for portraits? What did you think? Sound off in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments
LA M's picture

You can apply that to just about any 200mm for portraits....tried it years ago with a nikon 200mm f2...good novelty but impractical if you want to shoot with any kind of connection.

David Butterell's picture

Actually used it for full length portraits for the first time at the weekend. Fun because it's different but you're certainly some distance away, especially considering its a 300mm equivalent on the Fuji body.

Paolo Bugnone's picture

Biggest problem of that lens is how overpriced it is, it makes no sense for an APS-C 200 f/2 to cost more than a 200 f/2 for fullframe considering it needs to be corrected on a way smaller image circle.

David B's picture

This is why I think people should have multiple cameras. Less lens changes and you can have the best lenses for each system!

Ronaldo Joe's picture

Well when you consider that in full frame terms this lens is a 305mm f3 and compare it to what Canon and Nikon offer then it's right on the money.

Paolo Bugnone's picture

Canon 300mm f/2.8 II is one of the best lens ever made and costs LESS than this 200mm APS-C only lens from Fuji.
A 200mm f/2 on fullframe can be used cropped on a high megapixel sensor to give you equivalent resolution to the fuji, and as I said, 200mm f/2 for fullframe should be harder to design because it needs to cover a larger image circle.

Erpillar Bendy's picture

90mm or shorter is better for me. I don't care for that distant look.

Spy Black's picture

At 200mm or greater, the OOF difference between f/2 and f/4 isn't going to be a big deal. I've been shooting far more practically with my old 200mm f/4 Ai Nikkor, a lens that makes a 70-200 f/4 look overtly huge...

Spy Black's picture

This demo window is not too flattering... ;-)

Ryan Mense's picture

I'm just here for the beautiful images. Such good work!

Scott Sobers's picture

Sharing pics from the 2019 Montreal F1 Grand Prix with cars traveling between 100-190MPH.... all shot on XF200.... fantastic lens

Ronaldo Joe's picture

This is exactly what this lens was made for, sports and wildlife photography. Using it in studio is incredibly impractical because it translates to a 305mm f3