My First Experience Using Hasselblad (X2D Review)

I've never had the highest opinion of Hasselblad. 10-15 years ago I saw two of them completely fail on set. I saw them struggle with autofocus even in a bright environment. I've seen my cheap DSLR take better-looking images in low light.  When Hasselblad reached out and offered to send me the X2D 100C for review, I was skeptical. I assumed it would be another overpriced, niche camera that I could never recommend. Although I can't say I'll be buying one. I enjoyed my time with the X2D far more than I thought I would and its features do justify it's high price. 

A Medium Format Camera Under $10K

The biggest surprise was the price. Unlike Hasselblad’s previous $20,000 to $30,000 cameras, the X2D 100C is priced at $8,200, putting it in direct competition with the Fujifilm GFX 100 II. This is still an expensive camera, but it is far more accessible than its predecessors.

It remains a medium format system, though its sensor (43.8 x 32.9mm) is the same size as Fujifilm’s GFX series rather than the larger sensors found in Hasselblad’s flagship H series cameras that have now been discontinued. Even with the smaller sensor, it delivers stunning image quality and dynamic range while making the medium format experience more practical for more photographers.

A Camera That Feels as Good as It Looks

Hasselblad has always been known for its elegant design, and the X2D 100C continues that tradition. The camera’s all-metal aluminum body feels like it was machined from a single block, giving it a premium, solid feel. The grip is large and comfortable, making it easier to hold, especially for photographers with larger hands.

One of the standout aspects of the camera is its simplicity. The button layout is clean, almost minimalistic, removing unnecessary dials and controls. The camera is missing a D-Pad which is a bit strange, and encourages you to use the touchscreen. Luckily the touchsreen and UI is the best I've ever used—smooth, responsive, and as intuitive as a smartphone.

However, the LCD screen has some limitations. It tilts upward for low-angle shots but does not flip out to the side or rotate forward, which can be frustrating for certain shooting scenarios.

Hasselblad Gets Storage and Charging Right

The X2D has a built-in 1TB SSD, meaning memory cards are optional but not necessary. The camera charges via USB-C. 

I appreciated being able to charge and transfer at the same time without the next for an additional memory card, memory card reader, and battery charger. 

Image Quality and Performance

In use, the X2D 100C is surprisingly capable. The phase-detection autofocus system is fast, quitet, and accurate—something that was not true for previous Hasselblad models. While the camera does have face detection, it is not accessible in the main autofocus menu, making it feel like an afterthought rather than an intentional feature.

One of the most impressive aspects of this camera is its flash sync capability. Because the X2D 100C uses a leaf shutter built into its lenses, it can sync flash at up to 1/4,000 of a second. Most cameras max out at 1/200 or 1/250, making this a major advantage for photographers who want to create shallow depth of field images outside with flash. 

The camera also shoots 16-bit raw files with 15 stops of dynamic range. I tested it in Cueva Ventana, Puerto Rico, a location with extreme contrast between bright daylight outside and a dark cave interior. I expected to need multiple exposures to capture the full range of tones, but the X2D 100C was able to handle the scene in a single frame.

However, when comparing the results to my Sony A7S III, a 12-megapixel full-frame camera, I noticed that the dynamic range was very similar. While the 16-bit color depth is impressive on paper, the real-world difference in dynamic range may not be as significant as expected.

The Lenses: High Quality at a High Cost

The XCD 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5 is equivalent to a 16-28mm full-frame lens and delivers incredible sharpness with minimal distortion. However, at $6,000, it is significantly more expensive than comparable full-frame lenses, such as Sony’s 16-35mm f/2.8, which costs less than half as much.

The XCD 75mm f/3.4, equivalent to a 60mm full-frame lens with a depth of field similar to f/2.8, is priced at $2,200. While well-built and capable of producing excellent images, it is difficult to justify when compared to full-frame 50mm lenses, many of which offer faster apertures for under $200. 

Part of the reason for the high cost of these lenses is the inclusion of leaf shutters, which allow for high-speed flash sync. For photographers who take advantage of this feature, the cost may be justified, but for those who do not, these lenses may not offer enough value compared to other options. 

Who Is This Camera For?

The Hasselblad X2D 100C is a beautifully designed, well-built camera with exceptional image quality. It is a strong competitor to the Fujifilm GFX 100 II, offering a different user experience with a focus on simplicity and premium craftsmanship.

This camera is ideal for photographers who value image quality above all else, prefer a minimalist design, and frequently use flash outdoors. It is not well-suited for hybrid shooters who need video capabilities, action photographers who rely on fast autofocus tracking, or those who need a more budget-friendly system.

Being that I shoot more video than stills these days, the X2D wasn't made for someone like me, but for those of you who are willing to pay a premium for the pinnacle of image quality, the Hasselblad X2D is far better than I ever expected it to be.  

Lee Morris's picture

Lee Morris is a professional photographer based in Charleston SC, and is the co-owner of Fstoppers.com

Log in or register to post comments
13 Comments

As someone who owns the X2D, I think you did a really good job of reviewing it here. It’s wildly limited. Missing features that a $500 camera has. And that’s the appeal. It’ll never be a working photographers only camera. But a a specialist tool for this travel photographer I’ve never enjoyed using a camera more.

I’d be interested in your take on the more capable but more complex GFX100II.

I certainly prefer the extra features on fujifilm but I appreciate the leaf shutter on Hasselblad. Truth is, neither are for me, and I’m very happy with my Sony cameras at the moment.

my dream cameras were the Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246), the Leica S (Typ 006 or 007) and the Hasselblad X1D or X1Dii. the Leicas are classic cameras although some might say that it is difficult to autofocus a rangefinder camera and some might say that the medium format Leica S was too large and perhaps limited and slow in its autofocus. i owned one briefly as a pre-loved camera.

i find that the XCD lenses of the past looked lovely and rounded, almost as if they had a Japanese Tea House aesthetic. the V series lenses somehow look ordinary and slightly aggressive. i believe the lenses are manufactured by Nitto of Japan. i suppose one should judge an imaging device by its optical performance but looks matter especially if one spends thousands of dollars on a piece of hardware.

i was able to do a swap of my Fujifilm GFX digital camera and 20-35mm lens which had less than 400 shutter actuations for an X1Dii in almost perfect condition. i am looking for lenses, preferably brand new, but i find that some of the older lenses seem to be available only on the second hand market and the ones i selected but have not purchase have a significant amount of dust in them

Hasselblad, could your team retain the design language of your previous and older XCD lenses and abandon the ordinary, orthogonal, unappealing, unsophisticated design language of the new V series XCD lenses

I vastly prefer the new lens design. And the extra functionality of the V lenses.

100MP camera. So, you really need it or it's an added value?
I'm referring to the fact that many people believe that 24 MP is already good enough for all.

I like it, but certainly don’t need it.

No. 24mp is enough for most, not all. People who print big appreciate the extra resolution. I don’t use it all the time but for photos that I intend printing large, I love it

Hasselblad, i have seen raw video from modified H series cameras and it is lovely, i.e. medium format raw video with Hasselblad Natural Colour Solution colours.

somehow the X1Dii has limited video capability but the X2D has none and in light of the quality attainable from HNCS, could you reconsider this omission

I used to think leaf shutters were great, so ideal to put the shutter at the pupil. But now that I have 2 Sony bodies in which the focal plane shutter can be closed with power-off, the incidence of sensor dust has nearly vanished. This is of more daily advantage than is the concept of a leaf shutter near the lens pupil.

Leaf shutters have almost no shutter shock so no need for elctronic shutter or EFCS. And there's no real limit on flash sync. The downside is getting shutters faster than 1/2000. HB only make one.

Based on my experience with Phase One XF and the SK 240mm lens the ES is still producing sharper image on 1/8 - 1 sec shutter speed compared to LS mode, even on a very capable tripod. But that is just an extreme example.

So appreciate your thorough reviews! I started my photography career in 1988 using a brand new Hassleblad 503 CM, 150CF Lens (equiv to an 85mm) , just one 12 exposure back and Kodak Portra 120 film and a waist-level finder! I shot a hundred weddings with that as my only camera and lens combo. Oh, how times have changed!

This was an insightful and refreshingly honest take on the Hasselblad X2D 100C. I’ve been considering this camera but not sure I can justify the premium it charges versus my current setup with a full-frame high-resolution mirrorless camera and quality lenses. That said, it’s fascinating to see how they’ve refined their approach, particularly with improved autofocus and the inclusion of a built-in SSD—both features that make this system feel more practical for modern workflows.

The high-speed flash sync is a standout, especially for outdoor fashion and editorial photography where balancing natural and artificial light is key. That alone makes the X2D 100C a tempting option for controlled studio and location shoots. However, the steep lens prices remain a barrier, even when considering the advantages of the leaf shutter.

Your comparison to full-frame cameras in terms of dynamic range is especially interesting. It raises the question of whether the medium format “look” is more about the rendering and depth rather than just technical specs. Given the choice between the X2D and a similarly priced full-frame setup with faster glass, I wonder if the value proposition still holds up. Would love to hear more about how you felt about its overall usability in a fast-paced shooting environment.

Paul Tocatlian
Kisau Photography
www.kisau.com