I’m Tired of Gender Inequality and Sexism in the Photography Industry. Are You?

I’m Tired of Gender Inequality and Sexism in the Photography Industry. Are You?

I think that it’s often difficult for people to understand or see the real struggles that female and nonbinary creatives face in the photography industry. If you’ve been keeping up with current news, Canon has faced some criticism recently. They aren't the first and won't be the last to make a huge diversity misstep.

On July 14th, Canon announced that they would be relaunching their Crusader of Light program in the Philippines. Once all of their brand ambassadors for the program were announced, many readers were shocked. Not a single member of the 11 Crusader of Light team is female, non-binary, or LGBTQ+. This is not the first time that this has happened with a big name brand, and if you look across most of their ambassador lists, you will find that they are mostly male.

According to an article on The Phoblographer, here are the stats:

Number of Female Canon Ambassadors

•    Canon Philippines: 0/11 female ambassadors

•    Canon Hong Kong: 1/14 female ambassadors

•    Canon India: 1/10 female ambassadors

•    Canon Mexico: 1/6 female ambassadors

•    Canon Malaysia: 2/10 female ambassadors

•    Canon EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa): 34/113 female ambassadors

•    Canon Canada: 9/29 female ambassadors

•    Canon USA: 12/38 female ambassadors

This is a real problem, and it is not just Canon; it is industry-wide and deep-rooted. In 2017, Nikon did the same thing when announcing the D850. They launched a campaign and made this statement: “Meet 32 creative individuals from Asia, Middle East, and Africa, and join them as they embark on an experience with the latest FX-format D850 in their respective genres of wedding, nature, commercial, and sports. With their expertise in photography and videography, the D850’s technology, and Nikon’s craftsmanship, this is one DSLR ready to set a new world of limitless creative imaging possibilities.”

Not a single photographer out of the entire 32 member ambassador team was female.

Olympus UK did the same thing in 2016 when they announced their Visionaries and ambassadors. Out of 13 photographers selected, only one was female.

DIY Photography made a whole article on this topic in 2016, listing all of the stats for the big brands' ambassador programs, and apparently, not much has changed.

As a female photographer, I can tell you as a matter of fact that the issue is not a lack of female photographers who are qualified and capable. Instead, it is pushback and a real choice made by organizations and companies in who they hire and promote.

In my life, I have had multiple occasions where I was not given opportunities that I felt were based on my gender or age. Here are a few examples.

There is a local photography club that I have been a member of on and off for many years. A client of mine told me that he once asked their president why, as a local photographer who has an arts degree, traveled and worked on large campaigns, and won international awards, I was never asked to speak for them. I was told that the response was “why? She has nothing to offer. What would she even have to teach?” My website then and still to this day lists my accomplishments, magazine features, articles, gallery features, and more, including my favorite, when I won the National Geographic Travel Chase Adventure Competition. The prize for that was a luxury vacation with National Geographic to any of their destinations. I chose to go to Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks with them. I still treasure my National Geographic badge and the gear that they gave me.

Well, in October 2020 the club reached out to me to speak for them, but said that speakers are not financially compensated. This was odd to me, as I know many photographers who have spoken for them and been paid. I reached out to a male photographer friend who had spoken for them and asked him if he was compensated for his lecture. He told me that they did pay him without issue. I went back to the club with this information and another board member contacted me to discuss it. I was told that they wanted me to do a Zoom presentation but “unfortunately, I don’t have the ability to pay you.” I politely declined. She apologized for any miscommunication and confusion. I just checked their website, and on the page listing the entire 2020-2021 speaker lineup, only two of them are females.

In October 2017, a large camera brand, who we will call Brand A, approached me to become an ambassador and instructor for them. I was so excited to have this opportunity to work with a well-known brand and felt like I was finally having a huge career breakthrough. In emails and then phone calls, we discussed the details of joining the program and made plans for me to start with a podcast and several photo workshops. They invited me to meet with Brand A team members at a large photography convention.

I met with the rep at the convention and was introduced to several other company reps where we discussed my upcoming work with them. It was then that I was invited to go to their convention afterparty, which was held at their main stage once doors, closed to the general public. This party was open to any member of the Brand A professional service program. This is one of those programs where anyone who owns their gear and is a professional can pay a yearly fee to join and get specialized gear service, loaner gear, discounts, and support. They had big banners advertising the member’s afterparty and prizes that would be given away at it, including a recently announced camera kit.

It ended up being a pretty big event and very crowded. I was super nervous. I didn’t personally know many of the people there. In the corner, by the stage, I saw a familiar face. It was a well-known photographer that I had met a few years prior. As a member of the Brand A service program, I had borrowed a camera from the local sales rep. After my project was completed, I let the rep know, and he asked me to return it at a video shoot that they were having. It was there that I met this photographer, had a brief friendly chit chat, and then left. So now, years later, at the party, I approached him, relieved to see someone that I kind of knew in a sea of complete strangers.

I was surprised to be met with immediate disdain. When I approached, I said hello and got looked at funnily right away. I thought that he didn’t recognize me. Fair enough, we had only spoken for a few minutes one time before. I reminded him of my name and that I had met him a summer or two ago at the video shoot. He said that I was wrong on the year, that it was three years ago, which is more than several, which means two. Okay.

He asked me why I was there and how I deserved to be there. I referenced being invited by the manager of their instruction program because they were hiring me. He didn’t believe me. He wanted to know my credentials. It felt like an interview where I had to prove myself. I always feel like a jerk if I say things that I have won or done. I am not sure how to bring up accomplishments without coming across as boasting, so I usually just don’t. However, there are times like in this article or at that moment it is relevant, such as when I am directly asked. So, I listed some recent competitions that I had won. I also referenced winning another photo competition by another company that he also works with so maybe it would click for him. I also reminded him that the party was open to any member of the pro service program. I did not understand why this mattered to him or why I was being interrogated.

I was straight up told, loudly: “you don’t belong here.” I was so embarrassed. People were staring. He told me that he was going to text the other company to try to get proof that I wasn’t “lying about winning” and pulled out his phone to do so. I literally went to another country with this brand as the prize. I still have all the emails and photos. I was so shocked that in minutes, this man was trying to tear into me just for being invited to a brand afterparty. I didn’t understand his angle. Why be so nasty to me? He said that the company didn’t text back right away to confirm my story. I said okay and that I wasn’t lying and didn’t understand what his problem was. I walked away into the crowd, feeling so small.

I should have stood up for myself more, but I just avoided him for the rest of the party. I didn’t know this person well, and he is a long-time ambassador of Brand A. I saw no reason for him to react this way to me saying hi to him at an event. I went from being so nervous and excited meeting with the brand and being invited to the party to being completely crushed.

Not long after the convention, I got an email that the brand “was a little behind” and they wanted to reschedule our plans. I was informed that they were having a different division schedule me to speak in California instead. I was told to wait to hear from the Ocean County division. I never received contact from that division and reached out to follow up with no response. I still have all of the emails. They just ghosted me.

In December 2020, I decided to be bold. After years of hearing nothing from Brand A, I reached out to the manager that I had been working with. I asked him directly for any insight into why things didn’t work out. I wasn’t sure that I would get a response or what it would be, but it was something that haunted me. In March 2021, he emailed me back. He was very frank and open that it boiled down to the company getting wrapped up in the mirrorless announcements, “so we kept booking people we already had in the system.” He apologized to me and explained that over the years since that happened to me, the brand had downsized its educational division until it was completely dissolved.

So, why does this matter? If you reference the statistics that I listed for the big brands, you will see that existing talent for their programs is very heavily male-dominated. So, if the choice is to keep and recycle the same people over and over, it is obvious who that leaves out.

There are also many instances when in polite company, someone asks what I do, I reply photographer. They assume instantly that I photograph weddings, and I explain no, I'm a nature photographer. They ask to see my work. They look at it and are skeptical — flat out do not believe me. I get the same comments from random strangers online: "you took all of these photos? These are really yours?” They are shocked, but I have grace towards them and gently explain that it is all my work. More often than not, I am asked to prove it, so I send them a video or a photo of me in the field. Usually, they don’t respond or block me after receiving a video showing me photographing. People don’t like when you prove them wrong.

Why do non-male genders always have to prove ourselves? Why do people not believe that females can be photographers? I have learned from this to say: “I am a nature photographer. All of the work on my site and in my portfolio has been taken by me in my travels over the years. In reality, it isn’t as luxurious as it sounds. When you see a photo of an animal in the snow, I am out there freezing, but I love what I do.”

One time, I was at a gallery opening where some of my pieces were displayed among other local artists. A woman recognized me and approached me. I knew of her as a local college art teacher. She said to me: “Don’t you think it is interesting how if you are attractive but bad, you can just get into any gallery?” I said: “What? Do you mean me?” She laughed in my face. I said: “Well whoever you mean, this was a blindly judged jury to get in here.” I let her know that this was my first time in that gallery, that multiple artists were represented on the walls, and that I had never met them in person before being selected. She just laughed again and left.

Apparently, even when you work hard and earn things, even some of your own gender just assumes it has to do with anything but your own skill. It is not the first time that a stranger has made a nasty comment when they see that I earned something — “oh it’s because she is female.” My Instagram has 273 posts, 5 of them show me, usually in the far distance. I am not advertising my body or self-image to get ahead. I am actually self-conscious and usually hate photos of myself. It is something that I am working on and has nothing to do with gender, yet people find it hard to believe that a non-male can be “good” at photography, so they just make a sexist comment.

I am speaking on my own experiences, but I have heard similar stories from other female or nonbinary photographer friends. I won't speak for them, as their stories are not mine to tell, but I will address the facts and reality of a deep-rooted issue in our industry.

When I enter photo contests or gallery competitions, most of the time, there is an impartial jury. They are shown the artwork and know nothing of who created it. They select and award their favorite based on the judging criteria and merit, and that is that. Wouldn't it be great if the ambassador programs, directors of photography, outlets, news agencies, etc. had blind hiring based solely on your portfolio?

Overall, it is difficult for women to be taken seriously and hired. What strikes me as odd is that according to CareerExplorer.com, in the United States “65% of photographers are female and 35% are male.” There is a huge disconnect here.

It is not just big brands holding onto old boys' club values making misogynistic choices time and time again, it is magazines and news outlets who hire for covers and photo stories. An entire website, Women Photograph, exists to hold accountable the companies who hire photographers and where they are choosing to give their money. There are spreadsheets of data month by month and year by year of facts showing the dismal numbers. Women Photograph looked into EOY tallies: “At the end of every year, news outlets compile galleries of their favorite images from that year.” In 2019, only 21.31% of the photographs were taken by women. Why does this keep happening every single year?

In 2018 Photoshelter looked at gender equality and compared magazine covers that year to see the percent taken by women:

•    National Geographic: 0/12 (0%)

•    Sports Illustrated: 0/12 (0%)

•    TIME: 2/12 (16%)

•    Cosmopolitan: 1/12 (8%)

•    Vogue: 5/12 (41%)

•    Condé Nast Traveler: 3.5/12 (29%)

•    Entertainment Weekly: 0/12 (0%)

•    AARP: 0/12 (0%)

The first comment to that thread reads “Don’t care.” 

Look, I get it. A lot of people just do not care. This does not affect them directly, or the system as it stands works in their favor. Well, this is not for you then, this is for everyone else who does care and wants to see real change.

The industry as a whole is not giving non-male creators a fair chance.

I am just one person. I am not a well-known photographer or big name. I can only speak on my personal experiences and the statistics and ask for change. I challenge the big brands to catch up on representation, pay rates, and opportunities for nonbinary, females, POC, varied age groups, and all people. I am no one to ask, but I do so anyway. Those who refuse are making a choice for all to see. Rather than after the fact apologies when you get caught making clearly misogynistic choices, choose the COVID times to revamp your programs and hiring practices. It is 2021, and this is a time of change.

If you are reading this and care, please raise your own voice so that the outlets, brands, and companies know that you want this change. As a female creator, the 65% want to be heard. If you are a member of an underrepresented group, let them know you exist.

If you are a non-male professional photographer, have a resume of work, and want to be hired by any of the big companies, brands, or outlets, post your portfolio in the comments below. Let’s show them that there are candidates ready and waiting. There are so many talented, awesome people who deserve a chance. Don't let them have any more excuses.

kate g's picture

Kate is an award winning travel and nature photographer, educator and writer. She was classically trained on black and white photography in the dark room while she earned her BFA in Fine Art and Design. When she is not working on assignment, Kate teaches photography workshops to share her love and knowledge of wild life and wild places.

Log in or register to post comments
288 Comments
Previous comments

Thats great. That is why client have the right to chose whom they want to work with...glad you understand how it actually works.

Now stop being a simp and go make some money.

I'm not the one making a mewling display of myself.

You're utterly pathetic.

I guess that was meant to hurt my feelings? It is obviously that your father left your mother when you were younger and thus your and your siblings were raised without a father...So she only could teach you how to be overly emotional and take any comment as a personal emotional attack. Now you make personal attacks instead of analyzing the information and having a logical retort or well reasoned reply

You should stop sputtering and pointing like a high school girl....and stop simping because no one is going to date you on here. If you have nothing to actually helpful...or at least funny to say...fore or against the arguments, maybe you just be quiet, sit down in the corner sucking your lollypop, and let the grown-ups have their chat.

Thanks!

Not at all. You decided to throw the insult "simp" at me, and a cute little spin on the 'you are unemployed and living in your parent's basement' chestnut; which really sinks your implication that you are an adult.

However, what I didn't say is I looked at your images yesterday, and there is not a single image that was anything more than forgettable.

Honestly, you're just another insecure talentless hack, of the type that's all too common in these forums.

Your turn.

PS. you're way off the mark. You may wish to redraft your attempt to profile me.

Hey ...I never suggested you were unemployed and living in your parents basement...you take that back....wait do you?

I was saying that you are hoping to be a good little cuck and do exactly what your mother conditioned you to do and put women on a pedestal and support their baseless claims that they are disadvantaged in 2021...(white, middle-class, wealthy women are the most privileged group in history, in western society and they are doing the majority of the pointing and sputtering about everything)

If you constantly and blindly agree with what these types of women, that are constantly complaining, without taking the time to analyze and observe, their actions never match what their mouths are saying. You will usually see they are full of shit and being manipulative and dishonest to gain personal advantages because they don't measure up based on merit and basic hard work.

You know the same way that you or I have to compete against each other for anything. Women do not want to compete...they do not want to earn anything they just want it given to them...they can't and wont usually measure up. Not all but the majority of them.

Ohhh my you called me a hack and you looked at my images ...you wound me sir!

I am devastated ...

I am going to step in-front of a train tomorrow..

I would do it later today but i have a dentist appointment and its hard to get in to see a good dentist.

Happy Days!

Oh, now I'm a cuck.

You're just not very good at this, are yoù?

Now, let me help you out here. If you scroll up, you'll see my substantive contribution to this conversation was to post an interview of Jordan Peterson, within which he's demolishing a feminist interviewer. Hardly the way to make friends with the people you seem to think I'm trying to obtain sexual favours from, and that I am submissive to.

My limited interaction with you is based solely upon the fact you're an asshole; the first being because I made the effort to look at the Nikon ambassador's work, which really is very good for each of them. And yes, your work is the same shit I've seen thousands of times before; forgettable.

Try again.

So you can search youtube and pull up a viral video...meh....what about your own thoughts.....what do you believe and think?

Not just parroting or saying...watch this because that what mean....You don't seem to be not understanding what I am saying or have said...if I am wrong (and I am not afraid to be), then speak.

Say something profound on this subject at hand.

If you can't then just say so....(I bet your ego wont let you)

You are horrible at this...

It doesn't occur to you that the fact I posted it may suggest I agree.

Anyway, I'm done with you.

Then say that and move forward...

Keep moving forward...toodles.

You have a lot of valid points. Thank you for taking the time to share them.

I might add, I am totally on the same page with you on many points, like our failure to make ourselves known. And I absolutely don't want to be hired just because I'm a woman. I believe in working hard and producing excellent work. You'll see me allude to these points in this interview at about 51:20.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ckAL0I7bjQ&t=3582s

Hi, I wasn't trying to win any arguments, just pointing out what I see in the our culture.

I know and have been mentored by a few female famous photographers...and they are good at what they do...really good. and one of them has been doing it for over 30 years...and is still going strong.

Keep hitting the points and you will reach whatever your successful looks like. Doing the work is the only way to make it...there are no cheat codes that many people want and are looking for.

Go get em!

I appreciate that.

Talk about complaining… good grief, you have it down to an art.

The editorial staff of Fstoppers all support this article (hence their decision to publish it). Want proof? You’ve probably argued with half of them already. Scroll back through the comments, the ones with the FS next to them will be the ones you disagree with.

Know what that means?

The people who run this place, their place, fundamentally disagree with you.

This place isn’t for people who think like you think. To borrow one from the good ol’ book of the Old Boys Club:

Don’t like it? Leave.

Good luck finding a new home for your stale opinions. Maybe you can go over to DPR and argue about which camera brands suck and which one is the best.

FS isn't the market or the real world....

Clients dont care what anyone has to say here nor do they care what Hobbyists, Enthusiasts, PT Photographers or YT Photographers think...they really don't.

Here they are, and here you are. They’ve made it clear what they think of your views. So either zip it and read the articles or move along. This ain’t your house.

So you are someone who doesn't have anything useful to say or a personal opinion...except the one given to you by whomever your partner is...got-it.

Who's house is it....

...Runs House?

Asking for a friend.....

I’m a homeless incel, checkmate. With a name like “Choo Choo Chucklehead” did you think you’d succeed with that kind of flaccid insult? Wow dude.

This isn’t a place for you. If you don’t like it, like I said, zip it or leave.

Or are you having trouble internalizing the fact that you vehemently conflict with the people who run this website on a fundamental moral level?

Your views don’t fit in here, maybe you should try someplace like… I don’t even know, NewsMax? Do they have comments? Oh! Breitbart! You’d like it there, you’ll fit in better.

Wow so sad...

You sound like a Dixiecrat....

Or you are an overseer...keeping the "help" in line...

It's ok you too can can be of use...how much should you be paid to rat out on your race?

$20k...$30k....

Or are you like the majority and just shuck and jive with a smile on your face so you don't have to face up that you will never be anyone of consequence....so sad

Good day.

I’m sorry, I’m not American and I don’t get any of your references (there are 7 billion of us non-Americans after all). I just noticed you were a Pos so I decided to come out to play for a bit.
Toodles!

Neither am I ....POS's like us should stay together..but its good you still have absolutely nothing of importance to say...that is why you are not the ideal illegal..back to the strawberry fields for you...
Capeesh!

This is pretty funny. It’s like you’re trying to be mean or insulting but you don’t quite know how. Maybe it’s your style of writing? I can’t quite put my finger on it but it lands somewhere in between someone with ESL or a brain injury.

Thats not what your mom said before your were....son?!?! Is that you? OMG...Your mom and I never gave up hope after you went missing in the mall that day....but our relationship didn't last...but its ok...I am just happy you got the "special" help you needed and you can spell properly!

I'm a proud papa!!!

You’re back! I was so bored.
Sooo.. you gonna crank me off or what?

Kidding, kidding! Alright, I guess I should drop the charade and let you have a peek behind the curtain.
You’ve actually been really helpful, frankly, as you’ve ended up being the last case study that I needed for my dissertation. I fear I’ve been somewhat duplicitous with you, but don’t worry I’ll make sure your identity is anonymized in the thesis itself.

Let’s reflect on what has been garnered about your psychology during our short time together:

It started off with you reacting negatively to an article written by a woman about how women are treated negatively in a male-dominated field. This lead you to your first attempt at an insult in order to subvert your opponent (me) and get under their skin. Honestly, from someone who has been doing this for literally 5 months at this point it was pretty standard stuff: you made the assumption that I was male and then attempted to emasculate me by insinuating my theoretical wife/partner (another assumption) and I had swapped gender roles in our relationship. Based on your performance at other points in the thread there was a pretty solid story behind you being one of the type of people who attacks others using your own insecurities or things your psyche either consciously or unconsciously rejects. So going directly to emasculation was a clear signifier of insecurity and internalized misogyny. There is also a latent element of financial inferiority woven in here, which I elaborate more on later.

Your second attempt came draped in racism, and was honestly the most poorly worded of your three major jabs. It was legitimately confusing. The cliff notes version (assuming I’m not wildly off base due to the clumsy wording) being something along the lines of you comparing my character to that of a race traitor during the heyday of American slavery. It’s at this point that I assumed you were American since that’s largely where anti-black sentiment springs, but I checked your profile and was surprised to see you’re allegedly based in Canada! That was honestly a surprise. Again, here your choice to assume I was a racial minority and try to hurt me by calling me a race traitor (or possibly an oblique comparison where you were actually insinuating I was a gender traitor, it was genuinely too convoluted to tell) shows that while you might not be a devoted racist you probably engage in active racism in your life (as opposed to the passive racism of most people who consider themselves “not racists”).

Attempt number three further lent credence to this theory as your immediate impulse was to pivot and (again, if I understood your confusing wording correctly) compare me to a migrant farm worker, almost certainly of Latin American origin, who was in the United States illegally, most probably in.. California? I guess? That’s the most likely place where I was able to find strawberries as a major agricultural crop. Here you are attempting to both label me as non-white (a probable bias of yours as discussed) and also as poor - which you almost assuredly also find internally shameful. There were elements of that in your second go as well.

We can then draw in some supporting evidence from your profile. Standard fare male-gazey portraits, almost entirely of young, white women or white-passing women (One black woman though! Albeit sexualized). Fairly mediocre stuff from what I know of the subject, nothing especially “tells a story” other than “I was in a room with all these women at some point”. The community seems to agree, which explains your 2.8 star rating. Now, I stopped short of doing a reverse image search to see if those photos actually are your work because it’s not of any specific value to my thesis, but if they are then it does add a little bit to explain the insecurity.

At any rate, I got what I needed from you so I’ll leave you be. You’ve been helpful if also not the kind of person I’d want to hang around with. And while I don’t especially care where you end up in your life I do at least hope you one day grow your mind out of the place it’s in (and the dreadful biases that have you bogged down). Having those little nuggets of negativity and hate inside will hurt you more than you can know.

Kate G said,

"I think that it’s often difficult for people to understand or see the real struggles that female and nonbinary creatives face in the photography industry."

I find myself in this category. While I know that such discrimination does exist, because of the statistics that Kate provided, I have not seen this for myself within the circles that I frequent as a wildlife photographer.

Some of my best photography friends are women, and I have great respect for them as people and also for their abilities as wildlife photographers. Some of the very best, most talented, and most professionally accomplished wildlife photographers I know are women.

When I go afield to photograph wildlife, some of the locations have more men out there photographing wildlife at a very serious level, but at other wildlife locations, there are just as many women out there photographing as there are men, sometimes even more.

I have never seen any photography-based organization or entity say that men are welcome to join, but women aren't. I have never seen any publisher or stock agency say that they welcome submissions from men, but not from women. In fact, I have never seen any official or written policy in any area of wildlife photography that expressly discourages participation from women, but welcomes participation from men.

I do believe that some individuals in some positions have discriminatory biases, but I have personally never seen this at work.

It is pleasant to read that you personally have no such experiences. But is this relevant? What should a reader take with him or her after reading your post? That what Kate wrote is not really true?

Kate said,

"I think that it’s often difficult for people to understand or see the real struggles that female and nonbinary creatives face in the photography industry."

And what I wrote was in support of that statement of hers. I spoke of my personal experiences and observations, in order to show that she is right when she says that it is difficult for people to see and understand her struggles. Everything I wrote is a direct response to her opening line. How is that not relevant?

You picked out this one sentence of hers, which is basically just an empathetic statement to those who might think that the issue of discrimination is not that relevant or important because they have never observed it. But that's not what the article is about.
On the other hand, if the issue that understanding is difficult is so important, then the more interesting question is: why?
I may be unfair to you, but there is a well-known typical pattern when a voice of discriminated people is heard: People tell you that they know people in that environment and that they have never experienced anything like that themselves.
But discrimination is subtle and often does not happen openly. You or I can stand by and not notice it. It is often a similar mechanism to bullying.
I think there are more important things to say in response to an article like this than your own experiences to the contrary. Sorry for the open response.

Jan,

No need to apologize for your comment. I appreciate reading your viewpoint.

As far as my original comment is concerned, I commented on the thing that resonates most with me. I read Kate's entire article, and read it carefully and thoughtfully. The part that resonated with me more than anything else was that opening paragraph. That is what I kept thinking about. That is the thing that connects with what I see and experience in my own life, more so than anything else that Kate wrote. And so that is the part that I commented on.

All of the other things that Kate said, I believe that they are true, and that those really are her experiences. But I have never seen or experienced anything like that happening - those things lie outside of my own experiences. So I cannot relate to those things. Therefore I chose to write about the thing that I do relate to, rather than comment on things that I have no experience with or connection to.

The email I received from Canon U.S.A. today would appear to give some hope. It looks like 3 of the 5 new Explorers of Light are female.

Does anyone think this is a total coincidence, or does anyone think that Canon U.S.A. is intentionally trying to correct their past wrongs in this area?

I don't think this is a coincidence.Companies that strive for equal rights and opportunities often prefer female applicants to male applicants or people of a different skin colour with similar qualifications until the team, group or workforce has an equal distribution among employees. Some approach must be taken to reach this result.

In 2018 these were the women of canon...

LINDSAY ADLER, SUE BRYCE, MICHELE CELENTANO, BARBARA DAVIDSON, LAUREN GREENFIELD, SANDY PUC, STEPHANIE SINCLAIR, SUSAN STRIPLING, JOYCE TENNESON, and JENNIFER WU

There have always been women as "Explorers of Light" really ambassadors for Canon. At least since I started photography in 2013, they were not asked because they were women. They were invited because they are leaders in their markets. You also have to consider the 100s of women that turned down the invitation.

I believe people create the experiences they are looking for. If they are looking for a negative one, they will find a negative experience. I cannot talk about the situation outside of the US. But in the states, women rule and dominate a lot of photography markets.

If you bother to check, there have been more women added since 2018. So please don't come here with that BS...Oh, Canon is against women photographers. Get out of here.

I must agree that here in the states, I see lots and lots of women photographers who are very successful and in positions of influence.

I have seen this from several women on instagram. The narative is false. Why do these women care if a japanse company dosn't want them? Do your own thing! You allow yourself to be victimized and that is your fault. Have some personal agency.

"And sometimes you just need to bellyache about something."

3 posts so far, but he immediately jumps in as if he has something substantial to contribute - not!

Obviously you didn't read or understand this article. If you take your experience on Instagram as a reference, you are not really entitled to judge. So what is your real motivation for dismissing this article? Could it be inferiority complexes or feeling shortchanged in life? Then you would be a victim yourself.

The world doesn't give a damn about your world view and that of your kind. Get an idea instead of marking the offended here and reflexively jumping to the aid of men with inferiority complexes.You obviously haven't gotten over Kate's text either, so you're jumping to the aid of your kindred spirits.