Don’t Buy a Camera With These Features

Don’t Buy a Camera With These Features

Technology has come a long way over the last ten years, and it makes photography easier. There are features beyond the basic exposure settings that every interchangeable lens or bridge camera should have and others that should be consigned to the bin. Here are some considerations to avoid disappointment.

This article is mainly aimed at first-time buyers of cameras who, understandably, look for budget and second-hand models.

I handle many cameras ranging from the cheap and not-so-cheerful crap you find on supermarket shelves to sophisticated flagship beauties that cost thousands. Similarly, I get to use a wide variety of accessories too. Consequently, when a client comes to me with a camera that lacks a feature that I take for granted, I groan inwardly. If only they had spoken to me first.

Furthermore, photographers' lives would be so much easier if manufacturers considered their needs instead of churning out poorly designed second-rate gear that is lacking in some basic way.

All the camera companies, large and small, are multi-million-dollar businesses and could easily put a bit of thought into the development of even entry-level cameras and accessories. All of them have things they could do better. Here are some features that just don't cut the mustard.

Just One Command Dial

If you've ever used a camera with just one dial to control the exposure settings you will know what a faff it is fumbling for the +/- button to change the function from, say, adjusting the aperture to the shutter speed. It's so much simpler to have a command (control) dial at the front of the camera for your forefinger to operate and one at the back for your thumb. All entry-level cameras should have this basic design feature as it is so much easier for a novice to understand and use.

A Dial That’s Also a Button

If you have ever used a camera with one of these, you will know the issue I have with them. To get around the issue of pressing the +/- button they install a single command dial that changes function by pressing it inwards.

Annoyingly, it's almost impossible to rotate the command dial without accidentally pressing it in and changing the dial's function. That is especially so if wearing gloves. It's worse when the camera has been used, and the spring becomes a bit loose. One moment you will be changing the aperture and the next moment you have accidentally pressed it and are unwantedly adjusting the exposure compensation settings.

Vertically Orientated Command Dials

Vertical dials on the back of the camera are frustrating to use. They are almost impossible to turn when wearing thick gloves. It's even worse if they also double as a button.

I've tried several of these from different brands and they are all awkward. They either rotate too easily and thus lack precision, or they require too much pressure and can be pressed accidentally. Many people I've spoken to find them difficult. Again, a camera is much easier to use with two horizontally orientated command dials at the top of the camera.

The Canon 5D Mark III is still a fabulous camera, but has two of my least-favorite features that put me off buying one.

No Eye Switch

Automatic switching from the viewfinder to the LCD screen on mirrorless and bridge cameras is commonplace now. However, I was handling a client's camera earlier this week and there was no change when the camera was lifted to the eye, it required a button to be pressed. Any good mirrorless camera should have either the quick menu/control panel or live view available on the rear screen with the viewfinder automatically activated with the scene you want to shoot when the camera is lifted to one's face. Not having that and requiring a button press is ludicrously cumbersome.

No Diopter Adjustment

A couple of years ago, I helped a beginner who had a cheap DSLR and she could not see clearly through the viewfinder. I told her that she could use the little wheel alongside the viewfinder to adjust it to her eye. "What little wheel?" she asked. Sure enough, it didn't have one. Consequently, she struggled to compose photographs because she couldn't see what she was shooting.

I met her a year later and she told me she had given up photography because she was struggling so much with seeing through the viewfinder. Perhaps there is another lesson here and that is to not buy cheap cameras from online marketplaces, as she had.

No In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)

Most entry-level lenses don't have image stabilization. However, some do have that feature built into the body.

IBIS works by moving the sensor to offset the unwanted movements of the camera. Consequently, it can greatly increase the chances of getting sharp photos at slow shutter speeds.

As many beginners don't understand the relationship between shutter speed, focal length, and camera stability, being able to shoot with the shutter open for longer and still get a sharp shot is a big helping hand to getting better photos. More advanced photographers can benefit from IBIS too. I enjoy shooting with vintage and fully manual lenses, and that feature is a boon. It also enables handholding a camera in low light. For many photographers, IBIS is an essential basic feature.

The Nikon Z50II lacks IBIS.

Poorly Set Up Optical View Finder

Another client, a beginner I taught a while ago, had an entry-level DSLR. I was running a workshop about basic composition and started with the rule of thirds. No matter how hard she tried, her horizon ended up running through the middle of the frame. I tried her camera and, sure enough, although I placed the horizon on the third in the viewfinder when I looked at the resulting photo the horizon ran across the middle of the frame.

That example was the worst example I have found. But it demonstrates the sort of issue that entry-level DSLR cameras can have. Many DSLRs don't show 100% of the frame, although most mirrorless cameras do have 100% coverage. So, to avoid that sort of error, buying a mirrorless camera will give you better accuracy when framing the shot.

Moreover, many DSLRs have ridiculously small viewfinder images that make it impossible to accurately see what is in the frame. It's something that could easily have been fixed in the design and build of the camera at little cost and would help the photographer enormously.

Fixed Live View Screen

Years ago, I went into a camera shop with my heart set on a Canon 5D Mark III. It was, and still is, a smashing camera. However, it had no articulated screen. I am often shooting at knee or ankle height or putting the camera in a position where it's impossible to look through the viewfinder. Furthermore, although I am fully mobile, many hobbyist photographers are older and are unable to crouch or kneel. (Actually, most can do that, it's just getting back up again that's the problem.) Therefore, a fully articulated screen is an absolute must for many photographers.

The Canon R100 is cheap, but that lack of tilting or fully articulated screen and only one command/control dial are major disadvantages.

Tripod Failures

Those are the most common frustrations experienced by my clients’ cameras. However, other equipment can have shortcomings too. For example, most tripod manufacturers have universal Arca Swiss quick-release plates. They enable you to swap your camera between tripods and other mounts such as Peak Design's Capture Clips that allow you to suspend the camera from your bag strap. Having an Arca Swiss mount also means that should you lose the QR plate it is easily borrowed or replaced. But not all have that. Some have mounts that are specific to just that one brand or even one model.

Lower-quality tripods have diagonal stays that stop the legs from extending outwards. Often, you want to be able to move the legs further outwards to either increase stability or get the tripod closer to the ground. There are now reasonably priced tripods that do not have that restriction, so if you are buying a tripod, look out for that.

Stupid Nomenclature

I've written at length about this before. However, it would be so much easier if every camera company labeled their mode dial with an S for shutter priority, and called continuous autofocus just that, instead of using some hifalutin technical jargon.

Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the one thing that depends on you. You can pick up a camera and find it fits your hand perfectly, while someone else will find it uncomfortable to hold and the buttons difficult to reach.

What About You?

Those are the big problems I've come across that repeatedly frustrate my clients. Perhaps you are happy with some of those things. Features like a fully articulated screen are less important to a studio photographer. I also know someone who likes the vertically orientated command dial, but they never go out in cold weather wearing gloves. Furthermore, if you are on a restricted budget, you might be prepared to make these compromises.

Nevertheless, they may be things to consider avoiding when you spend your hard-earned money on new gear. My advice for those thinking about delving into the fabulous world of photography: please do not just buy the cheapest possible camera. You will soon find it is lacking and it will lead to disappointment.

Do shop around and ask people with different brands and different models what they like and don't like about their gear. But beware, everyone will tell you that you must buy the brand they use.

If you are an experienced photographer reading this and have found there are features on your camera equipment you wish were changed, It would be great if you could share your knowledge to help others choose their new gear.

Ivor Rackham's picture

A professional photographer, website developer, and writer, Ivor lives in the North East of England. His main work is training others in photography. He has a special interest in supporting people with their mental well-being. In 2023 he accepted becoming a brand ambassador for the OM System.

Log in or register to post comments
24 Comments

I used my Canon 6D for years and in some very cold and advert conditions , had no problems with the vertical dial with gloves on. I came from a 60D and did miss the tilting screen, glad to have it on my EOS R again. I don’t have IBIS, although it is nice to have in low light situations like shooting interiors of churches, for most of the work I do, I don’t need it. For landscapes I shoot on a tripod and for concerts the shutter speed ( or more correctly shutter time) the objects move to fast for lower shutter speeds anyway. Regarding nomenclature of shutterspeed, I read an nice article about it here on f-stoppers and it explained that shutter speed isn’t correct , it’s the time the shutter is open not the speed of the shutter, so Tv is a better name…
I was very amused by the image in my mind of you picking up your workshop attendees after they got on their knees.

"I was very amused by the image in my mind of you picking up your workshop attendees after they got on their knees." 🤣

I am 83 and use a rollator. I can stand, but I like shooting sitting because it puts the camera at what would be waist level if I were standing. The last time I tried to kneel for a shot, I ended up flat on my back—like a flipped tortoise. Friends helped me get up, or I'd still be there.

Using my rollator and the flippy screens on my Sony A6400s, I can put the camera on the ground looking up. The autofocus and all the other technical miracles make it possible to get sharp photos since I can only see the composition on the screen. I don't think I could photograph at all anymore were it not for digital.

Good to hear you’re still out and about taking photos, I hope to follow your example!

Funny, the Canon 6D, 5D MkIV, and the Canon R do not have IBIS, but are fantastic workhorses. 😉

Most people love the Canon command dial on the back. Those who don't are generally Nikon fans who dislike anything Canon.
Articulated screens are pretty much standard on all current cameras I believe.
Once one gets used to a camera system others feel awkward. The biggest issue most cameras have is a confusing menu system requiring digging through numerous submenus etc.

I dislike the back dial and have shot with a dozen canons over the years. They’re pretty much the only brand who does this, every other brand puts a horizontal back dial somewhere near where your thumb naturally falls. Even Canon has done so on a number of its own cameras.

If you’re used to the vertical implementation that’s great for you, but you’re speaking only for yourself. Trying to broadly write off disagreement as Nikon-fanboyism speaks more about your own brand bias than it does others.

The article is mostly complete nonsense.
While I agree with some points like not having a diopter adjustment or a poorly setup viewfinder, points like IBIS or button layout make no sense. You don't need IBIS for photos, in fact nobody cared about IBIS until Sony released the A7II in 2014. And while an articulating screen is a nice-to-have feature, it also isn't absolutely necessary. In fact, the EOS 6D which has none of these features is still in the Top 10 of the most popular Canon cameras on Flickr.

I can't imagine why/how a horizontal dial is any "easier" to operate with gloves on, then a vertical one?

If that's a "No Buy" factor allover camera sales would drop by a whopping amount, as almost every major brand has some degree of dials and/or buttons on the back, and if they didn't there wouldn't 't be enough room for a VF on top.

Ivor, I think you missed a very important issue, that being appropriate ergonomics for each individual buyer. No two photographers have identical hands, so I think it a critical step to visit a photo shop and "try on" any camera that one is considering. I failed to do that ONCE, and will not make that mistake again. Several years ago, I bought a Lumix GX8 which (mostly) gave me good images, BUT, the issue here was that the meat of my thumb overlaid the white balance switch on the back of that body, and I inadvertently shifted white balance too many times. When the original G9 came out, this time I went to the photo shop and tried it on to be sure that it fit my hand properly. I bought the G9 on the spot, then went home, packed up the GX8 and took it in to sell as used. And more recently, when the G9 II was released, I tried it on and immediately rejected it based on ergonomics. Fit to hand matters!

Hi Willy, I think I did say that in the article. "Ergonomics is the one thing that depends on you. You can pick up a camera and find it fits your hand perfectly, while someone else will find it uncomfortable to hold and the buttons difficult to reach." Thanks for the comment.

I prefer a mode dial marked Tv for time value over one marked S for speed. To each his own.

I also prefer the thumb control on the back of the camera to be vertical, just like the forefinger control directly behind the shutter button. I've never had an issue using it with gloves on. Every camera body I've bought since 2009 has had it, and at this point the muscle memory is so ingrained I'd hate to shoot with anything that doesn't.

That's fair enough. The pedantic side of me actually agrees with the term Time Value over shutter speed, but that's not what the mode dial is adjusting. The command (adjustment) dial does that when the camera is in shutter priority. Thanks for commenting.

Do you guys just let anyone publish stuff now? Sigh!

"hifalutin technical jargon" is the bane of my existence, as are acronyms without an explanation.

This article is mostly silly, but at least it’s not just “here’s a review of this thing a company gave me for free” so it at least brings a bit of novelty.

Shade for Ivor aside, the number of times I’ve had to get wet crouching down into a pond or stream to take a water-level reflection shot with a camera that lacked a fully articulated screen is too many. It’s especially frustrating when the screen articulates landscape but not in portrait orientation.

That said, it’s not a reason to write off a camera entirely. I’m not going to throw my 5DSR in the bin on the strength of that alone.

Sorry, I disagree with a lot of things in this post. Most Fujifilm cameras missed out on a few different things that you mentioned but honestly an ibis is overrated. We should be teaching people how to hold the camera properly...... interestingly I see people holding cameras like smart phones with their hands held out and they wonder why their images are blurry. The Nikon D850 does not have ibis but is still a camera. I would recommend for working professionals. Understand the exposure triangle and you can pretty much use any camera.

Just look at the photography website of the Author. Then you know how ''valuable'' his opinions are.

Thanks for the comment, Nev. The advantage of Ibis is the ability to handhold at much slower shutter speeds. I can handhold a 50mm lens on my OM-1 for two seconds. The D850 is a fine camera, but I cannot do the same with that. IBIS gives more flexibility to the photographer.

I agree about the way the camera is held.

I was thinking about beginning photographers and thought about my own camera “journey”
I started on a very tight budget and bought a Canon EOS 1000D , it was fine in the beginning and I learned the basics on it, I then realised the short comings, only one command dial, small viewfinder, slow autofocus. These things weren’t a real problem because I only shot landscapes , the next step was a 60D , tilting screen, two dials better viewfinder. Then I got into shooting events and concerts, and finally settled on a full frame camera (6D, 5D and now EOS R)
When starting out you don’t know your needs, and what kind of photography you are going to get into. If I would have bought an Olympus. OM-1 , I would be very happy shooting landscapes and wildlife, but would have been less happy shooting low light concerts. If I had the money and would have bought a Fujifilm GFX, landscapes and portraits would have been great, indoor sports and wildlife would be a struggle.
So I think it is a wise move to start relatively cheap and find your way, and then, if possible, get an upgrade in the direction you found.

Thank you, Ruud. I usually recommend that people go into camera shops and hold cameras to see if it fits their hands, then buy the best that they can afford. Most cameras have the same basic functionality. But if you pay more the camera will have extra features the novice can grow into. Plus, it will possibly have a longer shutter life. But, as you point out, there's more than one way of approaching it.

Well this post certainly opened Pandora's box didn't it. Ergonomics in camera design is a subject I'm currently researching. I've been a Canon user for, well, a long time. I'm currently using a Canon 200D, which doesn't have IBIS, I don't need it, but for me, it has everything else I need. Fully articulating touch screen, a great optical viewfinder with diopter adjustment, intuitive menu layout, a mode dial marked Tv, fantastic choice of EF mount lenses (currently using Sigma glass).
Coming back to ergonomics, I've a wide ranging camera collection. Two of the best ergonomicly designed cameras (I own) , in my humble opinion, are the Minolta Dimage 7i (2002) and the Dimage A2 (2004), yes I can hear the sniggering. They are digital bridge cameras. The A2 has IBIS, a tilting rear screen and a tilting viewfinder!! The 7i has the Minolta Anti Shake system. However, it's their control surfaces which are beautifully designed. For those unfamiliar with the 7i or the A2 check out DPReviews of these cameras and you'll see what I mean. Ergonomic design is subjective and devisive. There isn't a fit for all camera, there never has been, though the Dimage 7i and A2 come very close. Camera design has become function over form. More is supposedly better. Some of the comments here are a little critical of the topic presented. For me this article is crucial, not just for discussion, but for those who are just starting out on their photography journey.
Regards Rob.

Thank you, Rob. Yes, it was to generate discussion so people didn't just buy the cheapest model from Walmart and get stuck with one brand, when that might not suit their needs either in the short or long term. Thanks again for the well considered comment. You raise great points.

So don't buy the beyond excellent Nikon Z50II because it has no IBIS. The Z50II has the same processor as the flagship Z9, is a crazy good camera, but avoid because of no IBIS... Cue RDJ eye-roll.

It is a very poor article. It contains generalizations that don’t fit all purposes. What’s worse, it contains false information, such as “pushing dial problem”.