AI tools for editing are becoming more advanced, and some of them promise results that would have taken hours only a few years ago. Are they ready to compete with Photoshop?
Coming to you from Unmesh Dinda with PiXimperfect, this detailed video compares traditional Photoshop workflows with the much-hyped Nano Banana AI available inside Google Gemini and Adobe Firefly. You see how removing fences, tattoos, or skin blemishes can sometimes work with one click, while at other times, the results look artificial or inconsistent. The unpredictability is the key point. One attempt can give you flawless skin tones, and the next can leave you with odd textures or features that don’t match the original subject. That inconsistency is important to understand, because professional retouching depends on reliability, not chance.
The video shows situations where Photoshop is still the clear winner. If you’ve ever had to cut hair out from a background or maintain original skin texture while cleaning up imperfections, Photoshop offers far more control. Dinda makes it clear that AI can give entertaining or even striking results when compositing, like changing a chair into a throne, or turning a backdrop into something ornate, but those shifts come at the cost of resolution and accuracy. When you need your subject to remain truly themselves, traditional tools keep the fidelity intact. Creative freedom is only useful if it doesn’t destroy the integrity of the photo.
What may catch your attention most is the section on restoration. Here, Nano Banana shines in ways Photoshop alone would demand significant effort. Old, damaged photos can be brought back to life with surprising clarity in a matter of seconds, which can save you hours of work. Dinda notes that you still need to refine the results, but this is one of the few areas where AI doesn’t just feel like a gimmick. It becomes a practical tool you can actually bring into your workflow as a starting point. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Dinda.
No comments yet