The Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 70-200mm f/2.8 ASPH.: A High-Quality Lens with Some Drawbacks

The Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 70-200mm f/2.8 ASPH lens has been highly anticipated by users who want quality optics without the bulk of larger telephoto options. For sports and wildlife shooting, it’s essential to have a lens that not only delivers sharp images but also handles well during fast-paced action. But does this lens really meet those needs?

Coming to you from Bobby Tonelli, this detailed video reviews the Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 70-200mm f/2.8 ASPH and whether it’s a suitable choice for sports and wildlife photography. Tonelli mentions that this lens has been a long time coming for Leica users. Until now, those needing a 70-200mm have had to look at third-party options like the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 or the Lumix 70-200mm f/2.8. While these lenses perform well, having a native Leica option adds certain advantages, like better integration and consistency in image quality.

Tonelli highlights the build quality as one of the standout features of this lens. The lens feels solid, built like a tank, and far exceeds the standards set by most other brands. This quality does come with a downside: weight. Weighing in at about 1,500 grams, it’s a hefty lens that can quickly become tiring to use handheld for extended periods. Despite the weight, the compact design and internal zoom mechanism make it easier to balance and handle than bulkier lenses like the Leica 90-280mm.

Tonelli also discusses how the lens performs optically. The sharpness, color rendition, and contrast are all excellent, delivering the kind of results you’d expect from a Leica lens. Even when paired with the 2x teleconverter, the quality remains intact, showing little to no degradation. Chromatic aberration and fringing are well-controlled, and the bokeh is smooth and pleasing to the eye. This level of performance makes it an excellent choice for portrait and landscape work. However, for action photography, there are a few caveats.

One of the main issues Tonelli points out is autofocus performance. While the lens focuses accurately in most situations, it’s slower than competing lenses from Sony and Canon, especially when tracking moving subjects. The video also touches on some usability aspects. Tonelli mentions that the tripod foot could be improved to provide a better grip and more stability. He notes that the focus ring’s placement can make it awkward to handle, particularly when using manual focus. These design quirks might not be dealbreakers, but they add some inconvenience when using the lens in challenging conditions. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Tonelli.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
1 Comment

“ have had to look at third-party options like the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 or the Lumix 70-200mm f/2.8. While these lenses perform well, having a native Leica option adds certain advantages, like better integration and consistency in image quality.”

Interesting that this is stated given that the Leica 70-200 IS the Sigma 70-200/2.8 in a different housing.

I’d happily keep identical optics and save half my money.