Is the Nikon Z7 II or Z8 the Right Camera for You?

Both the Nikon Z7 II and Z8 have earned reputations as highly capable cameras capable of producing excellent images in a variety of conditions. With a thousand dollars of difference between the two, you might wonder if you need the more expensive Z8 or if the Z7 II will cover all your needs. This in-depth video comparison takes a close look at both cameras to help you pick the right option. 

Coming to you from Matt Irwin Photography, this great video review compares the Nikon Z7 II and Z8 mirrorless cameras. At $4,000, the Z8 is $1,000 more expensive than the Z7 II, and considering they both offer a 45.7-megapixel sensor, it is worth considering if your needs and bank account might be better served by the Z7 II. As you will see, both cameras offer extremely similar image quality and dynamic range, though the stacked sensor of the Z8 will offer you faster readout speeds of video and electronic shutter usage, an important consideration if you are worried about rolling shutter issues. What is even more interesting is that the Z8's high-efficiency raw files offer very similar image quality as the Z7 II's uncompressed raw files despite being two thirds smaller, a significant consideration if you are concerned about storage space for those large resolutions. All in all, though, unless you need high continuous burst rates or 8K video, it looks like both cameras will serve you well. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Irwin. 

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
5 Comments

Imo its not a question of IQ but more a question of performance in other ways. The Z8 has wildly better autofocus than the Z7ii for example.

"The Z8 has wildly better autofocus than the Z7ii". True, but not everyone is interested in having an extremelly fast AF. For example, the AF of the original Z6 is good enough for my use case, so I'm looking for a balance between IQ, DR, high ISO noise, weight, ergonomics, EVF, price... Each user has his own needs.

Not just about speed, also accuracy. Even when shooting static subjects the z7ii can struggle, especially in lower light situations. I have never owned a camera that struggles more in a studio portrait setting than it.

So how bad do these cameras suck then when I am still using D800 and never had issues with missing focus during portrait shoots especially in studio with controlled lighting yet these new cameras are twice the price and cant even handle the basics? Not to mention terrible battery life.

I agree. My old D800 also feels snappier with autofocus than my z7ii. It misses from time to time but if it does, it does it quickly whereas I constantly find myself in situations where the mirrorless is whirring back and fourth hunting. Not gonna lie, more than once I have considered going and buying a used D850 and just being done with Nikon Z but I know thats a temporary solution and that F mount is a dead system.

That said, I have heard Z8 and Z9 are much better.