Choosing a wide angle lens is usually a balancing act between cost and performance. An excellent lens can transform your shots, while a disappointing one can hold your creativity back.
Coming to you from Dan Watson, this insightful video breaks down the Sony FE 16mm f/1.8 G lens. At $799, it's priced remarkably lower than typical Sony lenses, prompting Watson to investigate if it’s too good to be true. One of the lens's most appealing features is its wide f/1.8 aperture, ideal for low-light environments, events, or dramatic landscapes. Watson points out how rare it is for wide angle primes to have filter threads, yet this lens includes a 67mm front filter size—useful for landscape photographers needing ND filters. He also highlights how the lightweight, compact build makes this lens appealing if you’re traveling or prefer minimal gear setups.
Watson notes this lens includes thoughtful hardware features, such as a physical aperture ring, linear manual focus, and two XD linear motors ensuring quick and silent autofocus performance. He specifically mentions the smoothness of the declickable aperture ring, particularly handy for smoothly adjusting exposure during video recording without noticeable exposure jumps. For video shooters, particularly wedding videographers, this could be a subtle but game-changing benefit. Additionally, Watson appreciates the inclusion of dust and moisture resistance, reinforcing durability for outdoor shooting scenarios.
Key Specs
-
Focal Length: 16mm
-
Aperture: f/1.8 to f/22
-
Lens Mount: Sony E (Full Frame)
-
Angle of View: 107°
-
Minimum Focus Distance: 5.9" / 15 cm
-
Magnification: 0.25x (1:4 Macro)
-
Optical Design: 15 elements in 12 groups
-
Aperture Blades: 11
-
Autofocus: Yes (XD Linear Motors)
-
Image Stabilization: No
-
Filter Size: 67 mm
-
Dimensions: ø 2.91 x 3" (ø 7.38 x 7.5 cm)
-
Weight: 10.7 oz (304 g)
However, Watson identifies two notable image quality issues photographers should be aware of: distortion and bokeh. The lens exhibits significant distortion and vignetting that requires correction in post-production, although it's automatically managed in JPEG and video files. This makes raw processing essential for optimum results. He also notes the lens' bokeh can be unusual and not particularly smooth. Still, given the wide angle focal length, bokeh concerns are less critical than sharpness or distortion control. Despite these caveats, Watson confirms that the lens delivers excellent sharpness, even outperforming some pricier zoom lenses when stopped down slightly.
This lens is positioned as a compelling option for wide angle shooters seeking affordability without sacrificing key functionality. The price is significantly lower than Sony's own premium zoom lenses, yet Watson suggests this lens holds its ground or even surpasses them in specific aspects of image quality. He mentions it would pair particularly well with compact Sony bodies, effectively creating a portable, high-quality shooting package. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Watson.
Thanks for a complete and full look that most would not tell about just because of the f/1.8. About saying cheep and you should say low price or easy on your wallet for every lens even the old film lenses all lenses are made great in their time periods, just saying cheep is like degrading to the lens makers!!! Well as a non pro astro and landscape photographer it is nice to have front filters BUT for landscape a front filter you need to of where the sun is and the rule of thumb when setting up, there are now filters you can put in the rear of the lens that the rule of thumb for the sun does not apply like doing a panorama and getting that downward hump in the middle of your panorama.
All the other 16mm lenses being telephoto is great for architecture inside were being able to adjust to a room is needed. Also the f/1.8 needs a faster shutter speed for the stars at night to be pin point not a bad thing for a faster image capture, just info for night shooters.
It would've been a decent "budget" option if there wasn't Viltrox 16mm f1.8 which is substantially cheaper and absolutely fantastically sharp at wide open with no vignetting, no significant aberration and very minor distortion. Essentially Viltrox had made a much better lens then Sony and done it first.
I agree i own the viltrox 16mm and i love it no complaints from me
The Sony actually has less vignetting than the Viltrox.