Amateur Vs. Pro Architecture Photographer Shoot the 'Dome House'

Last week Mike Kelley and I competed to see who could create the best images of the iconic dome house in Charleston. We released the images and allowed all of you to vote to determine who won. Today, the results are in. 

Mike Kelley fanboys and internet trolls around the world, brace yourself... I won the competition. Yes, the second set of images is mine. In the video above you can see how each of us took these photos and then you can also see our reaction when 70% of people believed that my images were taken by Mike Kelley and 70% also voted my images to be the best. 

The video is long and covers a lot so I'm not going to type it out but I will show you the before and after images from each of our shoots. 

Mike Kelley's Images

Mike Kelley's Final Montage

Lee Morris' Images

Lee Morris' Final Montage

As I admit at the end of the video, I'm not a complete amateur. I actually shot real estate for years long before I ever met Mike. For the last five years, I've been working with Mike to produce the "Where Art Meets Architecture" tutorial series where he reveals all of his techniques. The only reason I was able to beat him is that I simply used his own techniques against him. 

At this point, Mike is out for revenge and I'm sure we will be doing another competition in the near future so stay tuned for that. In the meantime, you can check out all of Mike's architecture photography tutorials and all of the other Fstoppers tutorials at

If you happen to have an extra $5 million laying around, this house is still for sale. You can learn more about it on and follow on Instagram. 

Log in or register to post comments


Usman Dawood's picture

Noooo freaking way!!!

Lee Morris's picture

Yes freaking way

Usman Dawood's picture

Hahah WAMA 4 with Lee.

I had to go outside for a cigar and collect myself after this one.

Patrick Hall's picture

I hope we hear from some of those who posted the comments you read. Greatest plot twist ever! Really wish Mike did take the extra steps to clean up that exterior photo though. That was a big mistake on his end

Mike Kelley's picture

Ha gimme a break. It's a beach with a sand dune - was I supposed to grab a rake and start cleaning?!

Patrick Hall's picture

Photoshop the sand, the power lines, and the house. Those were the biggest complaints with your whole series

Stas F's picture

Hey Mike, don't listen to them, ain't nobody wants to work for free ) Next time you in Boston I'm buying you drinks

Ash Chynoweth's picture

The foreground just seems dirty/messy/distracting to me.

Mr Hogwallop's picture

This reminds me of the Tortoise and Hare parable. Lee just worked harder and Mike sort of coasted IMO. In the first set #2 and #3 "after" pictures still look like "before".

Mike - time to re-watch your own how to videos :)

Lee Morris's picture

Ya but I was the Hare and I won... So the opposite of the parable.

Alex Ventura's picture

Depends on how you look at it. To me, it's like Mike was the Hare where he figured it was an easy win, took a break and enjoyed the sunset while relaxing through the competition while you keep going and won in the end.

Lee Morris's picture

Ah ok that makes sense too

Guillaume Marcotte's picture

yeah exactly, it's more " The Grasshopper and the Ant " by Jean de La Fontaine


Wow! That was a shocker! In Lee's first image, though, looking through the eyes of a real estate agent that I am; wondering if the photoshopped view through the window might be misleading to a potential buyer... thinking he might have unobstructed ocean views, but finding out otherwise when they show up. I know, I know, this is a friendly contest, for fun, per say. And I also know that photoshoping and editing images is common in real estate photography. But we come down to the same dilema; how much editing is too much? I remember you posted an article about his topic a few years ago.

Both of you guys are great photographers nonetheless

ron fya's picture

"wondering if the photoshopped view through the window might be misleading to a potential buyer... thinking he might have unobstructed ocean views, but finding out otherwise when they show up."
--> I think it's ok for an architectural photo to do it. It's meant to display elegance in a magazine or in the architect's portfolio. Especially if in reality it only takes to cut the bush to see the actual ocean behind.
On the other hand if it's for real estate, then it's not ok (nor smart because it takes time) to remove it.

Lee Morris's picture

I agree, but you will notice that I actually lowered the entire ocean. To make it more realistic I should have raised up even higher in the frame. The tree could be trimmed by the owner so I thought it was fair game.

Ian Davis's picture

Yeah, from my real estate perspective, I wouldn't push the line so far with the excess PS'ing. ("Could" is different than "is".) But then again, this was a fun competition between you and Mike. Thanks for the show! :D

Stas F's picture

Congratulations to Lee Morris. You can now start your own series of tutorials on KelbyOne :D

Adrian Lyons's picture

I think the before/after of Mike's last shot is flipped

Jim Bolen's picture

Nope, looks right to me.

Brian Stricker's picture

So...I got it right. In the video Mike said at 7:15 exactly why I knew that was Lee's image. Nice fireplace. LOL and the lighting on the outlet did it for me.

Ignacio Espana's picture

Thought the same thing lol

Scott Basile's picture

I voted way wrong. And I've been friends with Mike for years and do this shit for a living. I would have bet my last dollar that image 4 was Mike's. Killer set of images Lee. Lick your wounds Mike I'll keep my feelers out for a rematch property for you guys to shoot in So Cal.

Brian Stricker's picture

Everybody only looked at the lighting and not the composition. Lighting is interesting but doesn't highlight any aspects of the room...ot even the focal point fireplace. LOL

Colorblinded Photo's picture

I didn't pipe up because the popular opinion made me feel like a lunatic but I was against the crowd on the previous post. I thought the first set had much more interesting compositions pretty much across the board with better use of light and color. I agree that the external landscape was messy and had the weakest use of light of the first set though. It showed good a compositional mindset but there was clutter/crap dragging it down.

In the second set, the balcony view is nice but color is not used as well as in the first series. The interior shot manages to feel dark and cramped and uninviting to me. The exterior is a nice shot overall, even if the composition is less playful than the exterior from the first set (those birds add a lot, especially with the use of 1/3s). On the whole, the first series make me want to visit this place more than the 2nd.

Your mileage may vary, obviously it did for 70% of the crowd!

ron fya's picture

Congrats Lee ! I was fooled too with my guess. You did an excellent job at it ! Mike on the other hand has been quite lazy on this one I think. Especially in comparison to the amount of details he displays in the WAMA series.
Now the question is: was he lazy on purpose or not ? 3:)

Mike Kelley's picture

Netflix getting good mileage out of Lee's image already

Jacob Manonyane's picture

I guess I am part of 70% who thought Mike was the winner...the exterior shot with lights made all the difference!!

More comments