Netflix's recent docuseries, American Murder: Gabby Petito, has ignited debate due to its use of artificial intelligence to recreate Petito's voice. Approximately 21 minutes into the first episode, viewers are informed that her journal entries and text messages are presented using voice recreation technology. This method aims to narrate her story through her own words, offering a personal perspective on the events leading up to her tragic death, but many think the choice was disrespectful and in bad taste.
Directors Julia Willoughby Nason and Michael Gasparro sought and obtained permission from Petito's family before implementing this technology. They emphasized their commitment to accurately representing her writings, with Gasparro noting their diligence in ensuring the content was portrayed as written. The family's involvement extended beyond granting permission; they provided access to extensive personal materials, including Petito's journals, videos, and artwork, enriching the documentary's narrative.
Despite the family's consent, the decision to use AI-generated voice has faced criticism. Some viewers find the approach unsettling or disrespectful to Petito's memory. Concerns have been raised about the ethical implications of recreating a deceased individual's voice, with critics questioning whether this technology crosses a line in storytelling.
The docuseries aims to present a comprehensive view of Petito's life, incorporating interviews with her loved ones and previously unseen footage. Nason expressed a desire for viewers to gain insight into Petito beyond her relationship with Brian Laundrie, who confessed to her murder. The creators intended to balance the portrayal of the crime with aspects of Petito's personality and experiences, striving to honor her memory without sensationalizing the tragedy.
The release of the documentary has also sparked discussions about the broader implications of using advanced technologies in storytelling, especially in true crime narratives. While some appreciate the innovative approach to giving victims a voice, others view it as a potential exploitation of personal tragedies for entertainment purposes. This controversy highlights the delicate balance filmmakers must navigate between creative expression and ethical responsibility, particularly as new technologies and techniques become available.
