The masking upgrade in Lightroom Classic 15.5 lets you feather and reshape AI masks after you create them, which turns rough selections into precise, believable edits. That single change addresses one of the oldest complaints about automatic masks: they grab too much, too little, or leave a telltale glow around your subject.
A blueprint for learning photography that 340,000 people watched has aged in a way its own creator didn't expect, and three stages of it now point beginners in the wrong direction. The reason is AI, which arrived between the original video and this update and quietly changed what's worth practicing.
Skin retouching tools usually give themselves away by making faces look plastic. The new blemish removal tool inside Camera Raw takes a lighter hand, and that restraint is exactly what makes it worth learning.
Most of the conversations about AI in photography seem to stem from anxiety. The focus is on commercial jobs being replaced, fake images flooding our feeds, or a sense that what makes the craft feel real is eroding. It is a repetitive drumbeat and makes some sense. When a new technology moves this fast, the default reaction is to brace for impact and defend the boundary lines of our art. But if you look past the noise, there is a very different side to this tool that rarely gets talked about.
Anthropic has verified that it is assembling an internal team tasked with creating bespoke chips for its Claude AI models. This marks the first occasion the company has openly recognized a hardware initiative that had circulated as rumor since the spring.
AI-generated images, video, audio, and certain text now have to be labeled in the European Union, and the rules reach any content shown to people inside the bloc no matter where you are based. Break them and the fines can climb to 15 million euros or 3 percent of worldwide turnover.
Every day, in his comments and his inbox, Pye Jirsa gets some version of the same message. AI is for talentless cheats. Real photographers don't use it. You're helping drain the reservoirs. You're making billionaires rich while the rest of us scrape by.
Researchers in Oregon have built a low-cost camera trap that uses AI to spot and identify wild bumblebees without netting or killing a single one. The system matched the species diversity that lethal traps and hand-netting turned up in the same field, at a fraction of the effort.
A German appeals court has ruled that turning a copyrighted photograph into an AI-generated comic-style image does not automatically infringe the photographer's rights. The decision came out of a dispute over an underwater shot of a dog reaching for a red toy.
AI is not replacing photographers equally. It is changing the market value of every skill the profession is built on, separating those that were tied to the camera from those that will matter even more.
A growing wave of AI-generated animal videos is spreading across social media, and researchers say these fabricated clips are quietly reshaping how the public understands real wildlife. The concern is not just that the videos are fake, but that they present impossible or invented behavior as if it were documented fact.
Google researchers have published a paper laying out the system YouTube appears to be using to delete AI spam in bulk, and the numbers are large. Over six months, the system terminated 50,000 clusters covering 130,000 channels.
Patreon just started actively blocking the AI bots that scrape creators' work to train models, and it's good to see a platform plant a flag on the creators' side. I just wouldn't mistake it for protection.
Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey opens today, shot entirely on IMAX 70mm for a reported $250 million. Three days before it reached theaters, an AI studio announced an Odyssey of its own: 135 minutes long, made largely by one person over three months, for a budget in the mid five figures.
New York City wants landlords and brokers to tell you when the photos in a rental listing have been generated or retouched by AI. It arrived as one of 23 proposals in Mayor Zohran Mamdani's Rental Ripoff Report, and if it becomes a real rule, the people shooting those listings are the ones who will have to draw the line.
One of cinema's most influential creators just planted his flag firmly on the pro-AI side. In a wide-ranging interview tied to the opening of his Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, George Lucas said artificial intelligence is "the future" of moviemaking and that fighting it is pointless: "There's nothing you can do about it. That's progress, it's the future."
Meta built an AI detection tool to catch images made by its new Muse Image generator, then failed a basic test with its own pictures. When those AI images were cropped, the tool missed more than half of them.
Meta has removed the feature in its new Muse Image tool that let anyone generate AI images from your public Instagram photos, just three days after switching it on. The company said the feature "missed the mark" and is no longer available.
Roughly 650 freelance photographers who work for The Wall Street Journal have refused to sign a new contract they say could funnel their images into AI training. The fight centers on two changes: who owns the photos you shoot on assignment, and the paper's new right to license those photos to third parties without asking you first.
Instagram has started testing an "AI creator" label, an account-level badge that tells viewers a profile "posts content that was generated or modified with AI." It is clearer than the vague "AI info" tag Meta already sprinkles on some posts, and it reads like a step toward honesty in a feed increasingly clogged with synthetic images and video. There is one detail that undoes all of it. The label is entirely optional.
On June 10, during its 25th edition, the Tribeca Festival will premiere "Dreams of Violets," a docudrama feature in which every image and every person on screen was generated by artificial intelligence.
I am a fashion photographer by profession. Is AI going to take my job immediately? Should I quit now, hang up my camera, and forget it all? I decided to put multiple AI image generators to the test to see how quickly I'm going to be out of a job. After doing so, I feel safer in my current position, and here's why.
Many of today's advanced AI software features require extra subscriptions. This is also true for Photoshop's premium AI models in Generative Fill. But what if you could access the powerful Nano Banana AI for retouching without committing to another subscription? In this article, I reveal a pay-as-you-go method for using cutting-edge AI in Photoshop.
More cameras, fewer photographers. As this new day dawns outside my window, I pose a simple yet profound question: Is there still truth in photography?
Photography has spent most of its digital era chasing technical perfection. Sharp focus, clean files, controlled lighting, smooth skin, perfect exposure across the dynamic range. The pursuit was reasonable. Each generation of cameras and editing software made these standards more achievable, and working photographers who failed to meet them risked looking unprofessional. By 2020, a wedding photographer delivering a slightly soft image was apologizing for it. A portrait photographer leaving visible skin texture was risking client complaints. The technical-perfection ceiling kept rising, and the industry kept rising with it.
Artificial intelligence has quickly become part of the workflow for many photographers. From culling thousands of images to automating complex edits, there's now a tool for almost every part of the process. But not all AI is built for the same job.
I hate the idea of credits. It's like feeding quarters into an arcade game (yeah, I'm old), never sure how many it'll take before you get a decent run. After years of working with generative AI, the credit system feels like an ongoing beta trial designed to monetize trial and error.
As artificial intelligence continues to advance, everyone seems to be saying AI is coming for the fashion industry, especially for photographers and models. I recently put Nano Banana Pro through a real e-commerce test to see whether it could actually do the job of a professional photographer with a full team.
The Nik Collection of software tools goes way back to when Nik introduced some editing plug-ins for Photoshop in the 90s. Google bought the tools in 2013 and brought several of the tools together into a collection. But Google, as Google does, sold the collection off to DxO in 2017, and they began to rewrite everything with new code, and released a 7-app collection, adding an 8th shortly thereafter.
One of the more practical uses I've found for AI in photography is product placement — specifically, dropping a product into a photo you've already taken. Not generating a scene from scratch, but salvaging or extending a shoot you already have.
Photographers have been pitched AI from every angle by now. It will edit faster, cull smarter, retouch cleaner, and somehow save us from our own workflow. Most of those promises stay inside the image itself.
In a significant update to Luminar Neo, Skylum is focusing on AI-based portrait tools, as well as improving some of the included masking tools. This update is version 1.27.
Real estate photographers are watching AI tools flood their market and wondering if their work has an expiration date. The answer is more complicated, and the details are worth understanding before you change anything about how you run your business.
Photographers are worried about AI coming to take their jobs. Fair enough, with all the new tools out there you might very well think that. Yet, it is simply impossible, and Aftershoot has finally proven that. Aftershoot AI works for you, not against you.
AI-generated real estate listing photos are showing up on major property websites, and buyers have no way to tell they're fake. In California, a law requiring disclosure already exists, and agents are still ignoring it.
Professional photography expanded under conditions of limited access, high risk, and irreversible failure. Those conditions no longer define most photographic tasks. As they collapsed, professional involvement narrowed to a much smaller set of requirements. What remains is a persistent mismatch between task complexity and professional scale.
Cameras can identify human eyes at 30 meters. AI retouching erases decades from a face in seconds. Color grading that required a professional colorist and a full day of work in 2010 now runs automatically on your phone. By every measurable standard, we are living in the most technically perfect era photography has ever produced.
Camera brands collaborating with mobile phone companies is nothing that is particularly new. We saw this with Zeiss, with Leica, and even Hasselblad. But even this collaboration took me by surprise. That is, between Honor and none other than ARRI, with the Honor Robot Phone.
Photo fakery has existed since the darkroom days, with photographers removing poles from people’s heads or positioning dead bodies in photos for impact. But the fakery has shifted to the one place it never should have: the government itself.
The age of AI has been widely viewed as a direct attack on photographers and artists, and while off-the-cuff advice like "adapt or die" may seem practical, it misses the greater picture. Working photographers need to redefine their value by showing where their humanity and vision shine through in ways technology cannot replicate.
AI in photo editing went from thrilling to unsettling to flat in a short window. If editing speed, legal risk, and long-term control over your work matter, this shift affects how much you can trust the tools you use every day.
Artificial images are moving into places that once depended on real shoots, real light, and real decisions, and that shift is already changing how work gets commissioned and valued. If you make images for clients or personal projects, the pressure to compete with fast, cheap AI output is no longer abstract.
Technical skill is no longer a filter. What remains of photography begins where execution stops protecting the work, leaving only judgment and intent.
The skills that made you valuable in 2020 are now automated. Here is what matters now.
In an era of AI perfection, your biggest asset is reality. Here is how to make your portfolio more authentic.
CYME has just announced Peakto 2.6, the latest version of its AI-powered media manager for Mac, introducing what is now the most comprehensive AI-driven culling and deduplication tool available for photographers and visual creators.
Network-attached storage is like mattress shopping for creators: incredibly useful, rarely exciting. But after trying the Zettlab D6, I came away feeling like this is one of the first pre-built NAS products that genuinely tries to be something more than a black box humming in the corner.
Using Adobe Photoshop inside ChatGPT changes the math on quick edits, especially when the job is small but time is tight. The catch is that the results can look polished one minute and sloppy the next, so knowing what it can and cannot do saves missed deadlines and rework.
Current owners of Luminar Neo are getting a holiday update with some new and unique features. Besides the usual bug fixes and some speed increases, Neo has added what they call an AI Assistant.
AI masking in Lightroom has quietly turned into one of the fastest ways photographers change the mood and focus of an image without touching every slider by hand. If you shoot portraits and landscapes and want your edits to look polished but still natural, this walkthrough shows how to let the software do the heavy lifting while you keep control over the final look.