How to Become a Better Filmmaker

There is more demand for video than ever before and by an incredible margin. That demand, in combination with the plethora of new tools and gadgets for creating videos, has led to some of the fundamentals getting lost in the weeds. In this video, one filmmaker discusses how taking things back to basics can benefit your work.

With photography, I felt there was a simplicity to improving. I understood the components that dictated whether or not my images were any good, and I knew how — even if only in theory — to improve them. There weren't (and still aren't) too many ways you could get lost in the peripherals of photography. Videography, however, is a different story.

From the very first day I tried videography, I decided I needed a gimbal for what I wanted to do. You could argue that is similar to a photographer needing a tripod, but a gimbal has far greater influence over the appearance of the results. There is creativity and skill to using a gimbal both effectively and in a way that suits the video you're creating. Then there is post-production, which usually is significantly more complex than that of stills. This is before you realize that even most YouTube channels use drone footage, professional sound effects and music, and so on. It can be easy to get bogged down in all of the components that ought to be mostly supplementary. 

In this video, Aidin Robbins goes through some tips on how to become a better filmmaker by stripping back a little.

Robert K Baggs is a professional portrait and commercial photographer, educator, and consultant from England. Robert has a First-Class degree in Philosophy and a Master's by Research. In 2015 Robert's work on plagiarism in photography was published as part of several universities' photography degree syllabuses.

Related Articles

1 Comment

The issue I have these days is every person trying to teach how to be a better filmmaker isn't actually a filmmaker. We now judge if you are 'good' or not by how many subscribers you have. I am not sure how many subscribers Roger Deakins has on youtube but it shouldn't be the measure of his success. I am not old, early 30's when I got started a measure was could I ever get a 100k commercial gig. The problem with today is that we are listening to those with subscribers, not those who are successful. I do get it, building a youtube channel is the new medium, but it doesn't mean you necessarily are a good filmmaker. So this young guy has some good color correction and having 200k subscribers is awesome for him, but does it make a filmmaker with qualifications to teach how to make it. Maybe what I am asking is, maybe this video should be how to get better shots for a youtube channel.