Critique the Community Episode 11b: Head Shots

A few weeks ago we offered to critique a handful of head shot photographs from the Fstoppers Community. Patrick Hall and Peter Hurley sat and gave their feedback for 18 images. Since there were so many submissions for this genre of photography, Lee and I decided to add on an extra round of critique for the photos that were submitted. Check out the images we chose below and add your own thoughts and critique to the comments. 

https://fstoppers.com/photo/92580

https://fstoppers.com/photo/93527

https://fstoppers.com/photo/93629

https://fstoppers.com/photo/93700

https://fstoppers.com/photo/93879

If you missed your chance to submit your images for critique, keep an eye out for future submission opportunities for "Critique the Community."

The Fstoppers Community Rating System

If you have an Fstoppers account, you are able to create your own profile and portfolio directly within the Fstoppers Community. Once you have a portfolio uploaded, you can browse images in the community and rate the photos of your peers. Even though art is usually a fairly subjective matter, we wanted to create a rating system that was as objective and unbiased as possible. This way if one of your images has been rated 50 times and has received an average rating of 2 stars, you could feel confident that maybe that particular image is not up to par. Below is a simple chart explaining the Fstoppers Community Rating System. 

1 Star - The Snapshot

1 Star ratings are limited to snap shots only. Snap shots are usually taken to document a time or location but little to no thought has gone into the creation of the image. If an image has been "lit" with external light (besides a direct on camera flash) it is at least a 2 star picture. The majority of 1 star images have had no post production work done to them but do often have an "Instagram style" filter added to them. The average person these days snaps 1 star images every single day with their smart phones. Most 1 star images that pop up on sites like ours are images of flowers, pets, landscapes, sunsets, objects around a house, etc. If you read Fstoppers, you should not be sharing 1 star images for any reason. 

2 Stars - Needs Work:

All images, besides maybe 5 star images, always have room for improvement but 2 star images "need work" before they should be included in your portfolio. As photographers we are snapping thousands of images per year but only a few of those images should ever be shared or put into our portfolio. A photographer who has taken a 2 star image has put some thought into the composition, exposure, and post production but for some reason has missed the mark. 2 star images should not be in the portfolio of a full time professional photographer, and amateur photographers should strive for something better. Even complete amateurs who don't understand photography at all are capable of taking 2 star images from time to time. 

3 Stars - Solid:

A 3 star image is an all around good image. The photographer has a solid understanding of the basics; composition, color, focus, subject matter, and post production. A 3 star image is "good" but it's not great. Most part-time professional photographers have mostly 3 star images in their portfolios. Usually a level 3 image would have been rated 4 stars if it had been shot in a better location, or with a better model showing a better expressions, or there was better post production. A photographer capable of taking a 3 star image is capable of taking 4 and 5 star images if they would simply pay more attention to the details. 

4 Stars - Excellent:

4 star images are fantastic. In most cases, 4 star images have a certain style to them that links them directly to their creator. 4 star images usually require planning and attention to extreme detail. It's almost impossible to shoot a 4 star image by getting lucky. 4 star images have almost flawless conception, composition, lighting, subject matter, and post production. If you have any 4 star images in your portfolio you should be very proud of yourself.

5 Stars - World Class:

5 star images are flawless and unforgettable. The amount of time, energy, and talent that goes into the average 5 star image is staggering. In many cases these pictures require a team to produce including a professional retoucher. The concept, lighting, subject, location, and post production on these images has to be perfect. In some cases the jump from 4 to 5 stars may be as simple as changing the unknown model in the picture with a celebrity or bringing in a set designer or stylist to make the image slightly better. Although there are always exceptions, most 5 star images take days, if not weeks or months to produce.

Strengthening Your Own Portfolio

Even with our objective rating system, people are going to disagree with what they like because ultimately art is still a matter of opinion. However, we believe once an image has been rated over 25 times it will have a rating that is pretty fair and honest (we hope to deter trolls by giving negative Karma points when a vote is more than 1 star away from the community average). If one of your images in your own portfolio is rated lower than what you personally feel it should be rated, we would urge you to try to look at the image from an unbiased angle. Step back, erase your memory of the photoshoot itself, and try to imagine an art buyer, stock agency, potential client or local gallery as they decided if they wanted to invest in your services. Would your image make the cut?

We at Fstoppers are not the greatest photographers in the world. There are many many genres of photography that we have not been successful in or in many cases have not even attempted in our careers. However we believe we have a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn't in terms of commercial viability. Not every image is meant to sell or book you work, and that is okay! Snapshots and sentimental images are great and most definitely have a purpose. Hopefully our insight and critiques can help you decide what is and isn't worth putting in your own public portfolio. We hope these video critiques can help you see beyond the technical and personal elements that make up an image and begin looking at your own work in a new light.   

Log in or register to post comments

15 Comments

Matthew Anderson's picture

Very cool to see one of my images pop-up in this video. Thanks again for another great video guys!

Hey guys, it would be really cool, if you could get Von Wong to do a "CtC" session, themed "Visual Storytelling".

Patrick Hall's picture

We have a huge list of people we would like to do this with, we just have to find a time when we are all in the same place. I believe Ben is in the Southeast Pacific so it might be a while

Bill Peppas's picture

Can we have some landscape lovin' too pretty please ?

Erik Linden's picture

They did landscapes about a month ago or so.

Bill Peppas's picture

Link ?
Last landscape I remember is called episode 4 with Elia Locardi, which should be way more older than just 1 month old :p

Erik Linden's picture

Yep, that's the one, apparently 3 months ago. Man, time flies...

Alexandr Balakin's picture

About a my shot with redhead girl: it was a quite slow shutterspeed (1/100) for using with some fan from left side. And for the light i used pilot bulb of the studio flash, cause there are no other constant light :)
Thank you for reviewing my pictures, though (girl with cross on lips is my shot too :D)

Craig Mitchell's picture

Some really insightful lighting critiques by Lee in this.

how do I delete my comment?

David Strauss's picture

Do you see a trash icon when you hover your mouse below the "Report" icon on the right of the comments?

nope, but maybe I took to long to decide to delete? NM, just checked.... not there for me. Weird.

I enjoyed the critiques and the insights are valuable. I would have preferred more headshots and fewer portraits in the mix (12 to 8 by my count).

Pieter Struiksma's picture

I know it's hard to judge a series of photos. But there was no consequent line in this judging at all. I got almost an uncomfortable feeling.