Finding a personal photographic style is one of the slipperiest goals in the medium. It's also one of the few things that separates a forgettable portfolio from work that actually feels like it belongs to someone.
Coming to you from Max Kent, this thoughtful video walks through a five-year stretch where he felt completely lost with his own work after switching from film to digital. He didn't know what to shoot or why, and the absence of an identifiable style sat on him like a weight. His first move was to study photo books, not as casual reference, but as a way to see how other artists curate down to a single percent of their output. That level of intention is what gives a body of work its signature, and looking at it closely helped him start naming what he actually responded to: movement, atmosphere, a sense of dreaminess.
From there, Kent went back through his own archive with fresh eyes. Old photos take on different meaning once enough time has passed, and patterns start to surface that you couldn't see when you pressed the shutter. He pulled out three recurring elements in his own work: out-of-focus foregrounds used selectively, a dreamy quality, and a street photographer's mindset applied regardless of subject. He also points out that inspiration doesn't have to come from other photographers. Films, music, and even reality television can feed your visual instincts if you pay attention to what hits you. He uses Paris, Texas as an example of how composition and color from a film can quietly inform a photographer's choices without devolving into imitation.
The turning point came from a single question he asked himself, and it reframed everything that followed. The answer to that question shifted him away from chasing technical correctness and toward something far more honest about what he wanted his images to do. He talks about how style is bound up with personality, mental health, humor, and the way you move through the world, which means it isn't something you can force into existence on a deadline. It also isn't fixed. People change between 18 and 25, and again later, and a style that feels true at one point can shift as you do. Kent argues against treating it as a destination, framing it instead as a slow, ongoing relationship with your own work.
He also makes a useful point about genre. A style can run through street work, portraits, and sports photography all at once if the underlying voice is consistent enough. That common thread is what makes work recognizable, not the subject matter. And once you've found it, the act of shooting gets easier because the decision tree shrinks. You already know how you see, so you just go see it. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Kent.
No comments yet