In an era where electronic viewfinders have dominated most mirrorless cameras, it may seem old-fashioned to still use a DSLR camera with an optical viewfinder. Yet, as someone who has spent more than a decade behind the lens, constantly switching between mirrorless and DSLR, I still find myself drawn to the simplicity and authenticity of the optical viewfinder.
Unlike electronic viewfinders, which rely heavily on digital previews, the optical viewfinder offers a direct, unaltered view of the world, creating a seamless and natural shooting experience. This connection to the scene, free from digital distractions and unaffected by settings like white balance or exposure, is something I believe every photographer should experience. In this article, I’ll explain why the optical viewfinder remains my go-to choice even after a decade of experimenting with electronic viewfinders and why it deserves a place in your photography journey too.
A Seamless Shooting Experience with the Optical Viewfinder
One of the greatest advantages of using an optical viewfinder is its ability to deliver an entirely seamless and intuitive shooting experience. Unlike an electronic viewfinder, which relies on electronic panels to display a processed digital preview of your scene, the optical viewfinder offers a direct, unfiltered view of the world as seen through the lens. This means what you see through the optical viewfinder is precisely what your eyes naturally perceive, unaffected by settings such as white balance, exposure adjustments, or digital overlays, making it easy to focus purely on framing and composition.
This intuitive process mirrors the way we naturally see the world and helps photographers stay immersed in their environment while shooting. By looking directly at the scene without any digital interpretation, you can better anticipate movements, light changes, or fleeting moments, ensuring you stay connected with the action in front of you.
Good Visibility in Low Light and Challenging Conditions
One of the often-overlooked strengths of the optical viewfinder is its ability to provide clear visibility regardless of lighting conditions. Despite the constant improvements in electronic viewfinders over the years, I still personally struggle to see my subject in low light or under harsh tungsten lighting. This is because, in low-light situations, electronic viewfinders may introduce noise or lag as they amplify the scene preview digitally, making it harder to focus and compose with precision. The optical viewfinder, on the other hand, doesn’t require any digital processing as it simply lets in the available light, offering a clean and immediate view of the scene.
Additionally, under strong tungsten lighting or other high-contrast conditions, electronic viewfinders can sometimes distort color or overcompensate in brightness, leading to an unnatural representation of the scene. The optical viewfinder remains unaffected by these issues, allowing you to see the true color and light interplay in real time. This clarity helps you make accurate decisions about exposure, composition, and focus without second-guessing what the camera's screen is showing.
Independence and Battery Efficiency
Another significant advantage of the optical viewfinder is its ability to function independently of the camera's power, offering convenience and efficiency. Unlike an electronic viewfinder or LCD screen, which requires the camera to be powered on to display the scene digitally, the optical viewfinder allows you to compose and assess your shots at any time without switching on the camera. This independence makes it an invaluable tool for photographers who want to plan their shots meticulously or simply observe their surroundings without draining the camera’s battery.
Even when the camera is powered on, the optical viewfinder has minimal impact on battery usage, as it operates purely through an optical system rather than a digital display. This contrasts sharply with electronic viewfinders, which rely on continuous power to project a digital image and can quickly deplete the camera's battery, especially during extended shoots.
As an on-location commercial photographer, this battery efficiency can be a game-changer. When setting up complex shots that require hours of preparation for on-location product photography, having the ability to compose through the optical viewfinder without consuming much power is crucial, as we do not want to burn through battery after battery before capturing the final shot. Additionally, this benefit can be a lifesaver during outdoor shoots or travel assignments where access to charging options is limited, allowing you to focus on creativity without worrying about battery constraints.
Nostalgia and Reliability in Simplicity
Lastly, to me personally, the optical viewfinder is more than just a tool for composition. It’s a link to the roots of photography, evoking a sense of nostalgia in the way we create photographs, reminiscent of the film days. The tactile, analog nature of the optical viewfinder offers a timeless charm, reminding photographers of the simplicity and reliability of mechanical systems, making the optical viewfinder not just a functional choice but also a sentimental one with deep personal attachment.
Looking beyond its nostalgic value, the optical viewfinder’s design also inherently involves fewer electronic components compared to electronic viewfinders. This simplicity translates to a reduced risk of electronic malfunctions or failures, an important consideration for photographers who rely on their gear in extreme environments or long-term shooting conditions. With fewer circuits and displays to worry about, cameras with optical viewfinders tend to be more robust and less prone to the wear and tear associated with electronic systems, making them suitable for photographers who value longevity and low-maintenance gear.
Conclusion
The optical viewfinder represents a timeless blend of functionality, reliability, and emotional connection that I believe continues to resonate with photographers even in today’s digital era dominated by electronic viewfinders. From delivering a seamless shooting experience to excelling in challenging lighting conditions, conserving battery life, and offering unmatched simplicity, the optical viewfinder holds its ground as a valuable tool in modern photography. For those who cherish the tactile and authentic aspects of the craft, the optical viewfinder is more than a feature—it’s an irreplaceable companion that we will miss when it is phased out completely.
Do you think the optical viewfinder still has a place in a world increasingly dominated by electronic viewfinders, or is it time to fully embrace the shift to digital? Let me know your thoughts and experiences.
I've had this discussion on another site, with lovers of the older Viewfinders. When I first bought my mirrorless camera, it natively doesn't come with a viewfinder, and after a while, I understand why. Of course when I purchased it (Canon EOS M6 Mark II), I bought the extra viewfinder attachment. After many years of using the camera, I realized that I wasn't picking up my camera and putting it to my face anymore. I was relying much more on the rear-LCD screen... that I trusted more and more... and I learned how to use and compose from. I think the idea that you need to put the camera to your face is left over from a by-gone era. Then sometimes I'm shooting not with my finger on the camera, but with the camera up on a monopod, or tripod, and my finger is on my cellphone, that is blutooth'd to the camera... So the composition is on the LCD screen, but the trigger is somewhere else. So I get why you want 'Nostalgic roots', but technology is at your fingertips. Of course technology doesn't win you a great picture... During the Solar-Eclipse, I had my camera attached to my Surface, because I needed a bigger screen to make sure the manual-focus was correct. What I'm getting at here is, I don't think the Viewfinder provides any advantage over the LCD.
optical Viewfinder looks way better on day light ( hard light ) shots as with the current EVFS you get to see way more in the shadows than ANY evf that I have used. In those situations I tend to underexpose on purpose, something that makes the evf a guesswork a bit. That being said, I shoot on mirrorless only.
It looks like this to me. When I look through a viewfinder, I have the other eye closed. This means I block out the surroundings much more and am more focused on the image than when I use the screen at the back.
The second thing is that the analog viewfinder of a DSLR is much more comfortable, especially when I'm out and about at night, photographing the night sky or nightscapes, and my eyes have become completely accustomed to the darkness. I can see the image much more clearly through the viewfinder of the DSLR. The viewfinder or screen of my MSLR produces almost nothing but noise and I often can't see anything at all. In addition, the illumination of the digital viewfinder disturbs the eye, which is adapted to the dark.
For my personal work I love the real-world view provided by my Leica M. For my professional work however, I prefer an EVF which lets me know if my exposure and composition are correct.
I completely agree with you. That's why I still use my Nikon DSLR. Especially when I'm out and about at night.
--- "This is because, in low-light situations, electronic viewfinders may introduce noise or lag as they amplify the scene preview digitally, making it harder to focus and compose with precision."
In today, these types of complaints sounds like hyperbole. It just sounds like you are regurgitating how the first EVFs were almost two decades ago.
Back in 2012 when I was getting into photography and looking for my first camera, I hated OVFs. They are too damn dark.
Then, around 2016, my brother bought a Canon 5DS R and I was playing around with it. I hated the OVF. It's too damn dark.
Lastly, around 2021, my buddy lent me his Canon 60D (or maybe 6D) to second shoot with him on his wedding gig, I hated the OVF. It's too damn dark.
For me, I want things bright and clear. I want to be able evaluate the scene quickly and with the help of the histogram and zebras.
While EVFs still have their limitations, compared to the older generations of them, they have improved greatly to a point where they are fast enough and have enough dynamic range and a response curve that allows them handle manual exposure in most situations where a user may be shooting with the goal of post processing. Overall they have reached a point where the benefits outweigh the limitations.