In an era where electronic viewfinders have dominated most mirrorless cameras, it may seem old-fashioned to still use a DSLR camera with an optical viewfinder. Yet, as someone who has spent more than a decade behind the lens, constantly switching between mirrorless and DSLR, I still find myself drawn to the simplicity and authenticity of the optical viewfinder.
Unlike electronic viewfinders, which rely heavily on digital previews, the optical viewfinder offers a direct, unaltered view of the world, creating a seamless and natural shooting experience. This connection to the scene, free from digital distractions and unaffected by settings like white balance or exposure, is something I believe every photographer should experience. In this article, I’ll explain why the optical viewfinder remains my go-to choice even after a decade of experimenting with electronic viewfinders and why it deserves a place in your photography journey too.
A Seamless Shooting Experience with the Optical Viewfinder
One of the greatest advantages of using an optical viewfinder is its ability to deliver an entirely seamless and intuitive shooting experience. Unlike an electronic viewfinder, which relies on electronic panels to display a processed digital preview of your scene, the optical viewfinder offers a direct, unfiltered view of the world as seen through the lens. This means what you see through the optical viewfinder is precisely what your eyes naturally perceive, unaffected by settings such as white balance, exposure adjustments, or digital overlays, making it easy to focus purely on framing and composition.
This intuitive process mirrors the way we naturally see the world and helps photographers stay immersed in their environment while shooting. By looking directly at the scene without any digital interpretation, you can better anticipate movements, light changes, or fleeting moments, ensuring you stay connected with the action in front of you.
Good Visibility in Low Light and Challenging Conditions
One of the often-overlooked strengths of the optical viewfinder is its ability to provide clear visibility regardless of lighting conditions. Despite the constant improvements in electronic viewfinders over the years, I still personally struggle to see my subject in low light or under harsh tungsten lighting. This is because, in low-light situations, electronic viewfinders may introduce noise or lag as they amplify the scene preview digitally, making it harder to focus and compose with precision. The optical viewfinder, on the other hand, doesn’t require any digital processing as it simply lets in the available light, offering a clean and immediate view of the scene.
Additionally, under strong tungsten lighting or other high-contrast conditions, electronic viewfinders can sometimes distort color or overcompensate in brightness, leading to an unnatural representation of the scene. The optical viewfinder remains unaffected by these issues, allowing you to see the true color and light interplay in real time. This clarity helps you make accurate decisions about exposure, composition, and focus without second-guessing what the camera's screen is showing.
Independence and Battery Efficiency
Another significant advantage of the optical viewfinder is its ability to function independently of the camera's power, offering convenience and efficiency. Unlike an electronic viewfinder or LCD screen, which requires the camera to be powered on to display the scene digitally, the optical viewfinder allows you to compose and assess your shots at any time without switching on the camera. This independence makes it an invaluable tool for photographers who want to plan their shots meticulously or simply observe their surroundings without draining the camera’s battery.
Even when the camera is powered on, the optical viewfinder has minimal impact on battery usage, as it operates purely through an optical system rather than a digital display. This contrasts sharply with electronic viewfinders, which rely on continuous power to project a digital image and can quickly deplete the camera's battery, especially during extended shoots.
As an on-location commercial photographer, this battery efficiency can be a game-changer. When setting up complex shots that require hours of preparation for on-location product photography, having the ability to compose through the optical viewfinder without consuming much power is crucial, as we do not want to burn through battery after battery before capturing the final shot. Additionally, this benefit can be a lifesaver during outdoor shoots or travel assignments where access to charging options is limited, allowing you to focus on creativity without worrying about battery constraints.
Nostalgia and Reliability in Simplicity
Lastly, to me personally, the optical viewfinder is more than just a tool for composition. It’s a link to the roots of photography, evoking a sense of nostalgia in the way we create photographs, reminiscent of the film days. The tactile, analog nature of the optical viewfinder offers a timeless charm, reminding photographers of the simplicity and reliability of mechanical systems, making the optical viewfinder not just a functional choice but also a sentimental one with deep personal attachment.
Looking beyond its nostalgic value, the optical viewfinder’s design also inherently involves fewer electronic components compared to electronic viewfinders. This simplicity translates to a reduced risk of electronic malfunctions or failures, an important consideration for photographers who rely on their gear in extreme environments or long-term shooting conditions. With fewer circuits and displays to worry about, cameras with optical viewfinders tend to be more robust and less prone to the wear and tear associated with electronic systems, making them suitable for photographers who value longevity and low-maintenance gear.
Conclusion
The optical viewfinder represents a timeless blend of functionality, reliability, and emotional connection that I believe continues to resonate with photographers even in today’s digital era dominated by electronic viewfinders. From delivering a seamless shooting experience to excelling in challenging lighting conditions, conserving battery life, and offering unmatched simplicity, the optical viewfinder holds its ground as a valuable tool in modern photography. For those who cherish the tactile and authentic aspects of the craft, the optical viewfinder is more than a feature—it’s an irreplaceable companion that we will miss when it is phased out completely.
Do you think the optical viewfinder still has a place in a world increasingly dominated by electronic viewfinders, or is it time to fully embrace the shift to digital? Let me know your thoughts and experiences.
For your case I totally agree! I myself hate it too when wearing shades although they protect the eye but the process of removing the shades to shoot images is just too annoying. You are right on the LCD displays of cameras.. somehow manufacturers forgot to upgrade that thing but keep pumping the specs of every other things in the camera.
What camera do you use? There is a brightness controls to the LCD. I agree that it can be a problem with my Canon EOS M6 Mark II, but usually have not had issues, even when the Sun is directly overhead, and coming down at my LCD...
I'm with you about using glasses, and originally had the EVF attached, but then later realized I had stopped using it, and now I don't even know where I've laid it. Now the camera body is even lighter without it. (Because the EOS-M6-Mark II does not come natively with the EVF: It's an add-on feature.)
I disagree about the use of a OVF in low light conditions, I shoot a lot of church interiors and really struggled in some dark churches with my Pentax DSLR and is why I now use mirrorless. It is much easier to see in the dark with an EVF in my opinion
OVF personally only has advantage in low light and strong tungsten scenes because I dont have to fight with the digital compensation (for eg: overly bright highlights when compensated for the exposure). If you find yourself in a darker than dim environment that even your eye struggles to see I have to agree with you its useless. Which is why I have both set of cameras, depending on what I shoot, I will bring different set of gears with me
There is a reason for the acronym WYSIWYG when you use an EVF. You don't have to guess about the final image. As far as reliability of cameras is concerned, I would guess that an EVF not having any moving mirrors requiring periodic adjustments, should be superior to the OVF. On occasion I shoot with my Fuji X100T, which has the hybrid VF allowing me to switch between EVF and OVF at will. Personally I use the EVF almost exclusively. But if nostalgia is the reason for this article, then, whatever the writer's preference is, is fine with me.
Of course there are technological advantage by the EVF over the OVF. Perhaps I failed to highlight in the article that I myself have been a big fan of EVF since a decade ago and recently switched back to OVF to get back into the origins of photography. This entire experiment of mine was summarised into the article where I find bits that stood out.
While EVF has no moving parts which requires periodic adjustments. However, I have gotten an EVF electronics screwed from a simple activity and the repair cost is enormous.
Everyone will have a preference, and this article serves as a sharing of personal opinion and hopefully along the way encourage someone to experiment with OVF as well.
Using an EVF makes things easier. A sculptor who carves a figure out of marble isn't trying to take the easiest path in his artistic endeavor. Someone who rides a motorcycle cross country isn't trying to make things easier, either. So I appreciate the EVF for my professional work, but I love using a Leica M for my personal and artistic work. Having access to both types of cameras makes me appreciate each type even more.
Leica M is a very fun camera to use for personal work. Something about the way it shoots, the thought process is different with the conventional camera. Though I highly suspect that has something to do with the camera's footprint making it easier to approach and see the world.
Wysiwyg in the EVF is true if you shoot jpeg, what you see is a jpeg based on your chosen picture style. When you shoot raw and edit your images yourself this a partly true. When I want to protect the highlights and thus underexpose a bit, the shadows in the EVF get a bit dark, not a problem with an OVF. I mainly shoot mirrorless these days, and love the histogram in the viewfinder ( Olson based on the jpeg ) but in harsh light, I do prefer the OVF.
Yes while there are technological advantage on the EVF, I still feel both are irreplaceable tool both having their own edge over one another
As a 60 year user of cameras I love the electronic viewfinder far more than the optical
Period.
I signed an account after I read your article and the offensive comments below. I am totally in the same ship with you. For me the most realistic comment about OVF and EVF. I am an owner of a Fuji xt2 and xt3 as well as Pentax k1ii. I totally love the OVF of my Pentax maybe cause I learned photography in film years and I still believe my best photos are from those years. I am an amateur user and traveller my normal job is a factory (mechanical) designer engineer and 3d modeling and I am 46 not 100years old. I enjoy the comments about technology revolutions in art tools when visiting a museum an exhibition or simply enjoy my books or art books. I still buy books by the way I use kindle for my work
I had to read that a few times, and figured out you meant "I signed an account" = "I created an account"
Thanks for signing up and joining our discussion here at Fstoppers. Glad to know we have the same thoughts.